This may not be a bug - But it is an unfair advantage to the majority of players that
A: Opponent doesn't have the battle of wits
B: Using deck builders online you can pretty much ensure you build an unbeatable deck
C: Increases the chances of excessive "Looping" (Which is a rule breach)
D: If opponent with 60 cards has a solid deck, opponent with 250 cards can force a win just by playing defensively and healing constantly
E: Adds excessive healing "Looping"
F: Force a stalemate
The list goes on and on - There should be a seperate ranked gamemode for standard decks > 60 to create a more even playfield and better experience across the board, at a card meet I wouldn't play 60 cards against 250 it's impossible odds.
Knight#79205
This may not be a bug - But it is an unfair advantage to the majority of players that
A: Opponent doesn't have the battle of wits
B: Using deck builders online you can pretty much ensure you build an unbeatable deck
C: Increases the chances of excessive "Looping" (Which is a rule breach)
D: If opponent with 60 cards has a solid deck, opponent with 250 cards can force a win just by playing defensively and healing constantly
E: Adds excessive healing "Looping"
F: Force a stalemate
The list goes on and on - There should be a seperate ranked gamemode for standard decks > 60 to create a more even playfield and better experience across the board, at a card meet I wouldn't play 60 cards against 250 it's impossible odds.