Skip to content

Gero30#34241

My feedback

1 result found

  1. 2,463 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Gero30#34241 commented  · 

    Rebalancing cards that are perfectly fine for Historic Is a big mistake. While Aspirant and Goldspan Dragon are powerful cards they don't need a nerf for Historic. It also makes no sense to have a Goldspan Dragon stronger in Standard than in a non rotating format.

    I think that editing a card on the go is a lazy excuse to retcon some poor design decisions at the expense of the players and it's also confusing to keep track of what a paper card does and in what it's digital doppelganger differs.

    If this Is what you envision for Historic than just give us a digital eternal format, playable in paper with a modern interface. Please.

    Gero30#34241 supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base