Skip to content

thrikreed#27474

My feedback

3 results found

  1. 34 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    thrikreed#27474 commented  · 

    I have a similar problem with cards disappearing. I tried figuring it out... For instance, today I received a Zirda, the Dawnwaker card from a March of the Machines pack. It seemed interesting to build a deck around. When I went looking for it in my collection it, I couldn't find it without a format selected which it DEFINITELY SHOULD, right? When I looked in MTG: Gatherer, its listed as legal except for legacy. When I tried several other formats, it showed up in Explorer, Historic, and Direct Game, but not Alchemy or Standard. When I check the uncommon, rare, and mythic rarities and selected the March of Machines set while building a Direct Game I have 41 cards, when I change the deck building to standard I have 51... AND NEITHER includes the Zirda, the Dawnwalker card. When I change the search from March of the Machines to Ikoria Lair of Behemoths, the version of the card for March of the Machines shows up but not the version for Ikoria Lair of Behemoths.

    I tried doing a comparison with MTG: gatherer to cross check and get a couple of other examples and they just list the cards too differently from one another. For instance the Gatherer lists both sides of a card as separate entries while area doesn't. I did not find the sorting combinations that got the cards to line up close to each other in the time I allocated.

    My theory is that a programmer copied and pasted the new art over the old Ikoria Lair of Behemoths (or whatever set) entry in the MTG Arena files, included this (new art over old set entry) in the current pack sets... Effectively stripping players of their old art as well as their ability to play tons of cards in multiple formats. The one programmer has probably been doing it for awhile, which means the problem would show up sporadically since they started doing this particular job. I suspect they are not the only programmer entering cards for the set.

    thrikreed#27474 supported this idea  · 
  2. 2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    thrikreed#27474 supported this idea  · 
  3. 3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    thrikreed#27474 shared this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base