Skip to content

-DiViK-#42828

My feedback

1 result found

  1. Algorithm Improvement

    901 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    -DiViK-#42828 commented  · 

    25 lands in a deck. Can't get the 4th land by 12 cards 9 of past ten games.

    SetLands ratio (25/60): .4166666667 (.4) for simplicity
    IF 3 lands out of 9(.33) cards is less than .4 THEN draw land.
    IF 5 lands out of 9 cards(.55) cards is greater than .4 THEN draw a nonland.

    Simple ******* basic (learn within 2 weeks of first class of programming) is better than the donkey **** your paid programmers come up with.

    YOU CAN LITERALLY PROGRAM THIS THING TO HAVE AWESOME GAMES AFTER AWESOME GAMES BECAUSE NOONE GETS LAND****.

    Instead its, oh, you have 4 losses, in a row, time to have a perfect hand while your opponent gets ******. That isnt fun for anyone.

    I'll build a **** deck right now, literal ****, and it will win its first 5 out of 6 games because you want new decks from possibly new players to keep playing... You are not promoting the game, you're ******* off regulars with reasonable decks forcing landfucks. That kind of horse **** is impeding real growth and progress.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    -DiViK-#42828 commented  · 

    6 games in a row cant get past 2 or 3 lands. 3 of those games saw the only 2 legendaries i have in the deck within 10 cards. you can program around this nonsense. 24 lands in a deck and i cant get a 3rd or 4th land within 10 cards? Here's an idea: if a deck has 24 lands autostart them with 3 lands 90% of the time. You can program this or you shouldnt have this job. **** man, Im sick of running into this. Sick and tired of getting frustrated that should be even better than paper because of proper programming than way worse. Get off your ***. Even your suggestion box takes a lot of diligence to navigate. For ***** sake, get a new job.

    -DiViK-#42828 supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base