ANiNjA#92632
My feedback
3 results found
-
1 vote
ANiNjA#92632
shared this idea
·
-
2 votes
ANiNjA#92632
supported this idea
·
-
Alchemy
-
shows%20the%204%20copies%20i%20own.png 681 KB -
Screenshot%202026-02-10%20170231.png 341 KB -
Screenshot%202026-02-10%20170240.png 157 KB -
Screenshot%202026-02-10%20170224.png 114 KB -
Screenshot%202026-02-10%20170240.png 157 KB -
IMG_1951.png 3354 KB -
IMG_1952.png 2462 KB -
IMG_1953.png 722 KB -
Log20260124_235803.log 442 KB -
combustion_technique%20bug.jpg 962 KB -
Screenshot_20251119_003804_Magic.jpg 1039 KB -
Screenshot_20251119_003809_Magic.jpg 1086 KB -
Screenshot_20251119_003812_Magic.jpg 1823 KB -
Screenshot_20251119_003817_Magic.jpg 1197 KB -
Screenshot_20251119_003825_Magic.jpg 989 KB -
normal.png 1492 KB -
parallax.png 1516 KB -
retro.png 1585 KB
522 votesAn error occurred while saving the comment
ANiNjA#92632
supported this idea
·
-
I use Historic Brawl to playtest REAL cards in a format which is the closest relative to EDH. Separate alchemy from historic brawl! It's hard enough reading a double sided card when you're on a timer let alone a specialize card with 5 different variations. Also Oracle of the Alpha was a mistake, especially in a format with a max deck size. The fact that only blue players can play a card which adds 9 cards to a 100 card limit deck and the fact that those cards are not available to other players in the format unless they play oracle is not a balanced feature. Conjuring as well is adding cards past the max card limit and seek is not a mechanic that can exist in real game play. None of these Alchemy mechanics are fun to play against as they break the traditional gameplay laws that exist. I understand balancing certain cards but keep alchemy in it's own category.