emopinata#06364
My feedback
1 result found
-
Alchemy
-
shows%20the%204%20copies%20i%20own.png 681 KB -
Screenshot%202026-02-10%20170231.png 341 KB -
Screenshot%202026-02-10%20170240.png 157 KB -
Screenshot%202026-02-10%20170224.png 114 KB -
Screenshot%202026-02-10%20170240.png 157 KB -
IMG_1951.png 3354 KB -
IMG_1952.png 2462 KB -
IMG_1953.png 722 KB -
Log20260124_235803.log 442 KB -
combustion_technique%20bug.jpg 962 KB -
Screenshot_20251119_003804_Magic.jpg 1039 KB -
Screenshot_20251119_003809_Magic.jpg 1086 KB -
Screenshot_20251119_003812_Magic.jpg 1823 KB -
Screenshot_20251119_003817_Magic.jpg 1197 KB -
Screenshot_20251119_003825_Magic.jpg 989 KB -
normal.png 1492 KB -
parallax.png 1516 KB -
retro.png 1585 KB
520 votesAn error occurred while saving the comment -
As someone who has played almost every day for the past year and poured $1700+ into my Standard and Historic collections, the Alchemy changes in Historic make me regret ever playing Arena. Out of 20+ Historic decks only two were playable without swapping for rebalanced Alchemy cards, when they're not even the most broken cards in the format.
I got into Historic because I was a kitchen table player in paper and wanted a more challenging and interesting format closer to what I was use to without using the unsightly and annoyingly cumbersome MTGO platform. Now I can't even escape to Historic when Standard is boring me. Alchemy is fine if you want to spice up Standard, but keep it out of Historic.