elodin785#73664
My feedback
3 results found
-
891 votes
elodin785#73664
supported this idea
·
-
2,463 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
elodin785#73664
supported this idea
·
-
748 votes
elodin785#73664
supported this idea
·
Choosing "live rebalancing" of Historic cards kills my enjoyment of the format. I drop $50 a set, without fail, because I love having a large collection to play with in Historic. I don't mind that not all of these cards are playable in the format. I *absolutely* mind having playable cards nerfed without compensation or recourse. For that matter, I hate the idea of card nerfing at all. The lack of such behavior is one of the deciding factors that saw me playing Magic instead of Hearthstone or Legends of Runeterra.
I have stopped playing since yesterday's update. If this change moves forward, that will be true indefinitely. I will of course refrain from putting money into a game I do not play, so this is directly affecting your bottom line.
The only marginally acceptable alternative, if you insist on this nonsense, is introducing another "paper" non-rotating format. Give us Pioneer and I can play on the client while mourning the lost opportunity of Historic. Otherwise, maybe it's time to give up on the digital card game space, or maybe Pokemon will avoid live rebalancing of their cards. I guess we'll see.