To be honest, I never expected it to work. After getting scammed, I'd already kissed that money goodbye. Then I came across Resqprofirm via WhatsApp at +1 (985) 296-9146, and by email at Resqprofirm@gmail.com or Resqprofirm@aol.com. Like most people in my situation, I was doubtful. I didn't want to raise my hopes just to be let down again.

But something about the way they communicated made me take a chance. They were professional, never pushy, and didn't make over-the-top promises. They guided me step-by-step and kept me updated throughout. A few weeks later, I actually got my funds back something I genuinely thought was impossible.

It wasn't just about the money, though. It was about finally feeling like someone had my back. I'm truly grateful for what they did.

EDIT: Did not see Bill’s comment when I posted this.
——

To put it a different way, the “color” section in Advanced Search has options for “Include/Exclude/Exactly”, but I wouldn’t find Golos if looking for all 5 colors.

Having the Color option have an option for both Color OR Color Identity means that I could use the feature to find a commander or cards that I could use within a deck for them. Being that some multi-color commanders also don’t use all of the colors within the deck, being able to have an option for finding cards other than searching by exclusion of colors (which doesn’t account for color identity anyway), it would significantly move it up the list of card-sorting options.

We have plans to roll this out as the Card Database open access progresses! Thanks for the feedback.