Skip to content

drewtiger#58441

My feedback

10 results found

  1. 3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    drewtiger#58441 shared this idea  · 
  2. 3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    drewtiger#58441 shared this idea  · 
  3. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    drewtiger#58441 shared this idea  · 
  4. Algorithm Improvement

    933 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    drewtiger#58441 commented  · 

    There is proof that the supposed shuffle is NOT randomized properly, and needs to be fixed. the Proof:
    on the draw, your hand rates for a mulligan, and one of the cards is one of the most mana cost in the deck, and you only have one copy of it. Mulligan, and on THAT draw, the singular card is again in hand. Mulligan TWO MORE TIMES and Both times that singular card is again drawn. The odds of that happening with real cards are so far into "never going to happen" I am just going to say that instead of trying to type that big a number!

    drewtiger#58441 supported this idea  · 
  5. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    drewtiger#58441 shared this idea  · 
  6. 3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    drewtiger#58441 shared this idea  · 
  7. 5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    drewtiger#58441 commented  · 

    I agree that wotc software has some strange happenings. However, honesty [and years as an IT guy] forces me to point out there is a reason to check all those other things you are sure it aint: that is, everyone else's software is buggy too [because companies can't leave functional S**t alone]!
    To Wit: recently I had troubles with Arena, which had been running fine on my HP laptop... Long story short, some combination of recent updates & usage caused my Kaspersky Total Security to flag one of the components as questionable & restricted the application, even though both had been co-existing just fine for over a year!
    not saying wizards is faultless by any means, but they are not the sole problem.
    I'll stop there, as I'm about to hit one of my twitchy spots over stuff companies are pulling, that society had previously fixed, and now is letting happen again... oops... later

    drewtiger#58441 supported this idea  · 
  8. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  9. 16 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    drewtiger#58441 supported this idea  · 
  10. 25 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

Feedback and Knowledge Base