Uncle Steve#32077
My feedback
33 results found
-
41 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Uncle Steve#32077
supported this idea
·
-
Alchemy
-
shows%20the%204%20copies%20i%20own.png 681 KB -
Screenshot%202026-02-10%20170231.png 341 KB -
Screenshot%202026-02-10%20170240.png 157 KB -
Screenshot%202026-02-10%20170224.png 114 KB -
Screenshot%202026-02-10%20170240.png 157 KB -
IMG_1951.png 3354 KB -
IMG_1952.png 2462 KB -
IMG_1953.png 722 KB -
Log20260124_235803.log 442 KB -
combustion_technique%20bug.jpg 962 KB -
Screenshot_20251119_003804_Magic.jpg 1039 KB -
Screenshot_20251119_003809_Magic.jpg 1086 KB -
Screenshot_20251119_003812_Magic.jpg 1823 KB -
Screenshot_20251119_003817_Magic.jpg 1197 KB -
Screenshot_20251119_003825_Magic.jpg 989 KB -
normal.png 1492 KB -
parallax.png 1516 KB -
retro.png 1585 KB
501 votesAn error occurred while saving the comment Uncle Steve#32077
commented
MTGA could mitigate this loop by implementing rule 104.4b:
104.4b If a game that’s not using the limited range of influence option (including a two-player game) somehow enters a “loop” of mandatory actions, repeating a sequence of events with no way to stop, the game is a draw. Loops that contain an optional action don’t result in a draw.
An error occurred while saving the comment Uncle Steve#32077
commented
MTGA could mitigate this loop by implementing rule 104.4b:
104.4b If a game that’s not using the limited range of influence option (including a two-player game) somehow enters a “loop” of mandatory actions, repeating a sequence of events with no way to stop, the game is a draw. Loops that contain an optional action don’t result in a draw.
Uncle Steve#32077
supported this idea
·
-
-
22 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Uncle Steve#32077
commented
MTGA could mitigate this loop by implementing rule 104.4b:
104.4b If a game that’s not using the limited range of influence option (including a two-player game) somehow enters a “loop” of mandatory actions, repeating a sequence of events with no way to stop, the game is a draw. Loops that contain an optional action don’t result in a draw.
Uncle Steve#32077
supported this idea
·
-
7 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Uncle Steve#32077
commented
MTGA could mitigate this loop by implementing rule 104.4b:
104.4b If a game that’s not using the limited range of influence option (including a two-player game) somehow enters a “loop” of mandatory actions, repeating a sequence of events with no way to stop, the game is a draw. Loops that contain an optional action don’t result in a draw.
Uncle Steve#32077
supported this idea
·
-
14 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Uncle Steve#32077
commented
MTGA could mitigate this loop by implementing rule 104.4b:
104.4b If a game that’s not using the limited range of influence option (including a two-player game) somehow enters a “loop” of mandatory actions, repeating a sequence of events with no way to stop, the game is a draw. Loops that contain an optional action don’t result in a draw.
Uncle Steve#32077
supported this idea
·
-
19 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Uncle Steve#32077
commented
MTGA could mitigate this loop by implementing rule 104.4b:
104.4b If a game that’s not using the limited range of influence option (including a two-player game) somehow enters a “loop” of mandatory actions, repeating a sequence of events with no way to stop, the game is a draw. Loops that contain an optional action don’t result in a draw.
Uncle Steve#32077
supported this idea
·
-
42 votesUncle Steve#32077
supported this idea
·
-
16 votesUncle Steve#32077
supported this idea
·
-
49 votesUncle Steve#32077
supported this idea
·
-
3 votesUncle Steve#32077
supported this idea
·
-
3 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Uncle Steve#32077
commented
Rezzahan is correct about the hexproof trait, but why doesn't the indestructible trait still kick in and protect the creature? I'm new to MTGA, but it seems like an indestructible creature should survive Nowhere to Run.
Uncle Steve#32077
supported this idea
·
-
19 votesUncle Steve#32077
supported this idea
·
-
12 votesUncle Steve#32077
supported this idea
·
MTGA could mitigate this loop by implementing rule 104.4b:
104.4b If a game that’s not using the limited range of influence option (including a two-player game) somehow enters a “loop” of mandatory actions, repeating a sequence of events with no way to stop, the game is a draw. Loops that contain an optional action don’t result in a draw.