TomJackilarious#51483
My feedback
13 results found
-
60 votesTomJackilarious#51483 shared this idea ·
-
79 votesTomJackilarious#51483 supported this idea ·
-
108 votesTomJackilarious#51483 supported this idea ·
-
206 votesTomJackilarious#51483 supported this idea ·
-
124 votesTomJackilarious#51483 supported this idea ·
-
218 votesTomJackilarious#51483 supported this idea ·
-
110 votesTomJackilarious#51483 supported this idea ·
-
61 votesTomJackilarious#51483 supported this idea ·
-
66 votesTomJackilarious#51483 supported this idea ·
-
82 votesTomJackilarious#51483 supported this idea ·
-
20 votesTomJackilarious#51483 supported this idea ·
-
50 votesTomJackilarious#51483 supported this idea ·
-
2,451 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment TomJackilarious#51483 supported this idea ·
Some positivity BUT...
So, I actually like that wizards will the have the ability to rebalance problematic cards in historic rather then having to outright ban them. It will be great to have Omnath back for example. If rebalancing cards can help curate a better historic format that's great.
BUT
It makes absolutely no sense to me that whenever a card gets nerfed for being too powerful in Alchemy then the card will also be nerfed in Historic even if it was a perfectly fine card for the historic power level.
This is particularly concerning to me as a historic player because, when a new set comes out only the most powerful cards are playable in historic. So I get excited for those and buy packs or craft those cards. But now those cards are also the most likely to receive nerfs based on Alchemy power level so what is there to be excited for in the new standard set as a historic player?
This change seems to really disincentive buying standard cards as a historic player.
Why not keep the original cards for historic unless they need to be re-balanced for historic specifically?