Skip to content

Rezzahan#77802

My feedback

1483 results found

  1. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Rezzahan#77802 commented  · 

    Was the damage prevented? Or were only counters placed on Verilax? Because those counters do not rely on damage being prevented, they are placed even if the damage cannot be prevented. And thus Verilax gets bigger when the replacement effect is applied and can survive by sheer toughness.

  2. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Rezzahan#77802 commented  · 

    Doesn't have to. The ability does not state a duration for when the spell can be cast. Which means, there is only one time the player gets permission to cast it with that ability: during its resolution. A time when NO player has priority and could not even cast an instant.

  3. 2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Rezzahan#77802 commented  · 

    It is a permanent. That is not the issue. The problem is, rather your problem is, that the sacrifice happens TOO LATE. You have to have sacrificed a permanent BEFORE the end step begins, due to the intervening-if clause of the Airship's trigger.

  4. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Rezzahan#77802 commented  · 

    The Sword was returned due to having been eathbended. The Scrap Trawler had nothing to do with it. The Trawler's trigger is still on the stack in your screenshot and didn't do anything yet. In fact, its target seems to be the Mox Opal in the graveyard.

  5. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Rezzahan#77802 commented  · 

    It's a white containing deck that wants its creatures to die (or doesn't mind if they do). It certainly runs Voice of Victory, and most likely had one on the field.

  6. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Rezzahan#77802 commented  · 

    Did they have Nowhere to Run in play?

  7. 2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Rezzahan#77802 commented  · 

    Not a bug. If you cast the spell with a target, it becomes a targeted spell and falls under the rules that govern those. And those rules state, that if a targeted spell has lost all legal targets when it tries to resolve, it will get countered by the rules and NONE of its effects happen. If you want to avoid that, do not choose a target, making it an untargted spell.

    608.2b If the spell or ability specifies targets, it checks whether the targets are still legal. A target
    that’s no longer in the zone it was in when it was targeted is illegal. Other changes to the game
    state may cause a target to no longer be legal; for example, its characteristics may have changed
    or an effect may have changed the text of the spell. If the source of an ability has left the zone it
    was in, its last known information is used during this process. If all its targets, for every instance
    of the word “target,” are now illegal, the spell or ability doesn’t resolve. It’s removed from the
    stack and, if it’s a spell, put into its owner’s graveyard. [...]

  8. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Rezzahan#77802 commented  · 

    Not a bug. That land was animated, and became every creature type, so WAS AN ANGEL, and thus a legal target for Book of Exalted Deeds. This combo was known and abused ever since it first came out via Kaldheim's Faceless Haven. Mutavault is the other land this can be abused with. They had to ban the Book in Standard 2024 (a kind of future Standard format at the time, that excluded the Standard sets that would rotate out a few months later), because there was no answer in that format. Until Field of Ruin came to Standard with that rotation.

  9. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Rezzahan#77802 commented  · 

    Commons and uncommons do not have duplicate protection, never did. Only rares and mythics are duplicate protected, so that if you have 4 of one of those already, you get a different rare/mythic. Excess commons and uncommons contribute to the vault. If you happen to have all rares and mythics of a set, that can be opened in packs, you get 20 or 40 gems instead. Though you will not a get a rarity upgrade. Meaning, if you have all rares and are only missing mythics, if you open a rare, you get 20 gems, not a missing mythic. Not all cards associated with a set can be opened in packs. Special product cards must be purchased via that product or crafted with wildcards.

  10. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Rezzahan#77802 commented  · 

    Unless you have anything that cares about Ozai having flying and indestructible as he is being declared as attacker, there is no reason to get that mana into your mana pool before declaring attackers. The ability is a static one and comes online as soon as there is 6 or more unspend mana in your mana pool. Not a trigger, no delay, it happens right away. Just get that mana before blockers are being declared so that he has flying.

    You could set a stop to beginning of combat to float mana before declaring attackers.

    You CANNOT use mana abilities during attacker declaration, unless some effect, like Ghostly Prison, demands a mana payment for declaring attackers. That is how the rules work, not a quirk of Arena.

  11. 0 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Rezzahan#77802 commented  · 

    First, there is only one action taken during the resolution of Strategic Betrayal: exiling a set of objects. That set is a permanent plus all cards in the graveyard. The exile happens all at once.

    Second, it doesn't matter wether the exile happens simultaneously or in sequence, since the land is not sacrificed, but exiled directly. SB asks for exile not a sacrifice. And Earthbend can return the land if it goes directly to exile. which is does in this scenario.

    701.66a “Earthbend N” means “Target land you control becomes a 0/0 land creature with haste in
    addition to its other types. Put N +1/+1 counters on it. When that land dies OR IS PUT INTO EXILE,
    return it to the battlefield tapped under your control.”

  12. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Rezzahan#77802 commented  · 

    Airbending is not a blink or flicker effect. The airbended permanent gets exiled, and the owner of the card can REPLAY it from exile for 2 mana later.

  13. 2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Rezzahan#77802 commented  · 

    "Whenever this creature attacks, you may cast an Ally spell from among CARDS YOU OWN exiled with this creature."

  14. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Rezzahan#77802 commented  · 

    "Whenever a NONTOKEN artifact you control enters ..."

  15. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Rezzahan#77802 commented  · 

    That a sign, that you lost connection, and are probably have lost your first turn already. Maybe even the game due to timeout.

  16. 2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Rezzahan#77802 commented  · 

    It wouldn't be a 6/6 either way. It's either a 0/0 plus however many counters earthbending put on it (this is the case when the March was put on the field before earthbending the land), or it will be a 6/6 plus however many counters earthbending put on the land (this is the case when the March comes down after earthbending the land). 6/6 is not going to happen without further shenanigans.

  17. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Rezzahan#77802 commented  · 

    " If the gift was promised, instead COUNTER TARGET SPELL."

    Long River's Pull can counter ANY spell, if the gift was promised. So the question is, did you get the gifted card? If yes, nothing wrong with this card.

  18. 4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Rezzahan#77802 commented  · 

    "Does this also apply to new artifacts that enter the field? For me, these were also treated as lands. Is this the expected effect?"

    Yes, and yes.

  19. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Rezzahan#77802 commented  · 

    The unpayable cost is the 3 life additional cost that Terror of the Peaks demands for your spells targeting it.
    You only had 2 life left, and couldn't pay that.

  20. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Rezzahan#77802 commented  · 

    Read the full text of Starry-Eye Skyrider. The part you obviously missed is at the very bottom:

    "Attacking tokens you control have flying."

Feedback and Knowledge Base