bonsai#70698
My feedback
222 results found
-
4 votesbonsai#70698
supported this idea
·
-
2 votesbonsai#70698
supported this idea
·
-
7 votesbonsai#70698
supported this idea
·
-
4 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment bonsai#70698
supported this idea
·
-
2 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment bonsai#70698
commented
Yep. This is definitely correct RAW behavior. The rule just shouldn't have been written that way as it makes zero gameplay or narrative sense.
-
4 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment bonsai#70698
commented
Honestly, I think Pioneer is the format that WotC forgot. WotC doesn't seem to know what to do with it.
Alchemy has been broken from the beginning and I have no hope it will ever be balanced...let alone fun.
-
6 votesbonsai#70698
supported this idea
·
-
8 votesbonsai#70698
supported this idea
·
-
7 votesbonsai#70698
supported this idea
·
-
11 votesbonsai#70698
supported this idea
·
-
6 votesbonsai#70698
supported this idea
·
-
5 votesbonsai#70698
supported this idea
·
-
4 votesbonsai#70698
supported this idea
·
-
4 votesbonsai#70698
supported this idea
·
-
4 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment bonsai#70698
commented
Yep. Sadly, this is now proven behavior with the latest patch.
bonsai#70698
supported this idea
·
-
13 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment bonsai#70698
commented
I'm seeing this too with the latest 2025.49.50 patch.
The fact this fundamental deck building bug somehow made it past QA is appalling.
How can you *not* have a sideboard-building test as part of first-pass QA?!
Screenshots and Log files are attached.
bonsai#70698
supported this idea
·
-
2 votesbonsai#70698
shared this idea
·
-
2 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment bonsai#70698
commented
I don't agree with a separate matchmaking. I'll go further and suggest these sorts of cards don't belong in magic.
I simply don't play against grossly large (off-min-format sized) decks. Mathematically, it's apples vs oranges.
-
1 vote
An error occurred while saving the comment bonsai#70698
commented
I'm fine with small creatures having Trample though it does go against the thematic narrative of the mechanic.
What's not cool is having creatures with exponential (doubling/halving) effects. Any percentage or exponential power increases/decreases are rife for abuse in the game and represent lazy game design.
Tifa Lockhart https://scryfall.com/card/fin/206/tifa-lockhart should've never been printed.
-
2 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment bonsai#70698
commented
Did you have the 2nd casting countered? The 2nd casting must resolve in order for the win condition to take place. See the rulings https://gatherer.wizards.com/AKH/en-us/4/approach-of-the-second-sun I agree that the legacy wording is inaccurate on the card itself since it doesn't mention the 2nd one must resolve--only cast from hand.
Amen. I've be lobbying for a set of player moderation tools for years. Atm, I simply keep a list of known "bad actors" and refuse to play with them. It used to be 12. Sadly, it's now ballooned to 92 in just the past 6 months. Without moderation, this is what happens to a player-base.