Skip to content

Rezzahan#77802

My feedback

910 results found

  1. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Rezzahan#77802 commented  · 

    Vorinclex, Monstrous Raider, or Solemnity. Read your opponent's cards, they are not inert on your turn, and each word is important.

  2. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Rezzahan#77802 commented  · 

    Then there was almost certainly something else, that prevented that damage. Like Rem Karolus, or Tajic, Legion's Edge.

  3. 2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Rezzahan#77802 commented  · 

    You probably did get an additional combat phase. But, first, you have to go through the whole of this one first, and second, you have to have a creature able to attack in the next combat phase. And seeing that you untapped before declaring attackers in that first combat phase, and then likely attacked with all of your creatures able to do so, taping them, there's none left to attack with the next combat phase.

    edit:
    Just tested it, and it's simply you not having anything to attack with. The card works fine.

  4. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Rezzahan#77802 commented  · 

    Yes, that happens. Since every pack you open has an about 10% chance to contain a rare or mythic wildcard, and those seem to be equal in probability, you will get a rare wildcard from roughly every 20 mythic packs you open. Should you only get mythic wildcards from mythics packs? Yes. Is is currently so? No.

  5. 5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Rezzahan#77802 commented  · 

    It's a face down Uro. Face down effects are applied after copy effects. Both are layer 1 effects, but copy is 1a, and face down is 1b. A face down Uro doesn't have any attack triggers, it's just a 2/2.

  6. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Rezzahan#77802 commented  · 

    There's that equipped Pact Weaopn on Jinny.

  7. 2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Rezzahan#77802 commented  · 

    The mana cost is ONLY what's printed in the upper right corner of the card. The costs for Explosive Derailment's modes are ADDITIONAL costs, which you have to pay even if casting a spell without paying the mana cost. So no, Villainous Wealth does not let you cast spells for free, only without paying the mana cost, which may or may not be the entire cost of a spell depending on the spell. (Additional note: any X cost spells must have X=0 if cast withpout paying the mana cost.)

  8. 3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Rezzahan#77802 shared this idea  · 
  9. 2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Rezzahan#77802 commented  · 

    Read Terror of the Peaks. Any spell you cast that targets it has an additional cost of 3 life, which you can't pay since you are at 1 life.

  10. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Rezzahan#77802 commented  · 

    You got yxour two Egg tokens from the Hatcher last turn, seeing it being summoning sick, so that ETB definitely happened. The Egg sac triggers at the beginning of your combat phase. So if you want to attack with the 3/3 token that would create, the Hatcher has to be played before combat begins. If it actually came from under the Fight Rigging, then too bad, that was already after the beginning of the combat, and thus the Egg sac never triggered, the time for that was already over. The Hatcher and the Egg have to be on the battlefield when you move to the combat phase.

  11. 2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Rezzahan#77802 commented  · 

    It works fine for me, I've just tested it in every way it could be played against sparky. The first target is the player, then you can target a creature, or select 0 if you don't want to target a creature. Then you get to search. All targets are chosen before the search, as it should be, according to the rules.

    So what issue do you have with the card?

  12. 2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Rezzahan#77802 commented  · 

    Seems like there are even more things bugged than just that. After all, Kambal's first ability should only trigger once per turn, as it states. And the second ability, that should have killed your opponent right away, since 30 tokens entered the battlefield under your control, and that ability has no "once per turn" restriction.

    The Peregrin Took + Confectioner is a well known combo by now, or should be. It works, because the Confectioner triggers for each Food sacrificed, and the Took gives your opponent one additional Food per token created. So the Confectioner makes a total of 3 rats and 3 Food for one activation of the Took, which requires sacrificing 3 Food. Rinse and repeat, stop before your library runs out of cards.

  13. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Rezzahan#77802 commented  · 

    Your stickers are 7/10 which is ok. Your phrases are 15/15, so adding one more goes over the limit. Remove a phrase, then you can add another. Click on a phrase you are using so that it gets grayed out, then select the new one you want to add. (Note the scroll bar at the right side of your phrases, which lets you scroll down to the ones not shown)

  14. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Rezzahan#77802 commented  · 

    Well, an attacking or blocking creature with either ability when the combat damage step would begin will make the game have two combat damage steps. Without that, there's only one combat damage step.

  15. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Rezzahan#77802 commented  · 

    1) The DFC was an experiment with the first Innistrad set, and it was a great hit with the player base. So wizards has no reason to avoid DFCs when they are a viable solution to templating problems.

    2) Flip cards were tried in Kamigawa block, and where quite awkward, so wizards is very unlikely to use something like that again.

    3) Old Innistrad werewolf transform triggers are quite different from the day/night transformation, and also quite awkward. The day/night was an attempt to make that easier to handle. Wether it was a success is debatable, but the two approaches are not unifiable without some major rewriting of cards. Much like phasing and other old stuff, it's part of the game's history now and will remain for the rest of its existence, for beter or worse. It's the nature of the game.

    bonus) there are constructed playable werewolves at those mana costs.

  16. 2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Rezzahan#77802 commented  · 

    Both copy effects and face down characteristics are applied in layer 1. Unfortunately for you, copy effects come first (layer 1a), turning your creature into whatever you chose to copy, and then the face down status is applied (layer 1b), making the creature a 2/2 colorless creature with no name nor mana cost.
    Essentially, you got a face down Zopandrel from your Polymorphous Rush (is the card I assume you meant).

  17. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Rezzahan#77802 commented  · 

    Read the Appraiser: it only triggers when cast, merely entering the battlefield won't do.

  18. 2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Rezzahan#77802 commented  · 

    Neutralize the Guards says "target opponent", and you are only trying to change the target of the spell, not its controller. So the only legal target is the spell's controller's opponent: you. So nothing could be changed.

  19. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Rezzahan#77802 commented  · 

    You plotted it, therefore you already have to pay an alternative cost of "without paying the mana cost". You can only pay one alternative cost, so cleave is not an option.

  20. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Rezzahan#77802 commented  · 

    Yes, there was. She is called Myrel.

Feedback and Knowledge Base