Gungywamp#22856
My feedback
6 results found
-
31 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Gungywamp#22856
supported this idea
·
-
67 votesGungywamp#22856
supported this idea
·
-
31 votesGungywamp#22856
supported this idea
·
-
9 votesGungywamp#22856
supported this idea
·
-
11 votesGungywamp#22856
supported this idea
·
-
12 votesGungywamp#22856
supported this idea
·
With people having found the internal MMR scores for cards in Brawl, I think it can be fully agreed upon that those scores need severe retweaking for the sake of having Brawl actually being fun and more fair. Yes, this is partially just me QQing because I'm too poor to buy Wildcards and packs to make a proper deck, but if I can't make a proper deck, I shouldn't be seeing Azusa/Greenwarden/Scute or Emergent Ultimatum decks that are seemingly well optimized.
Just like, set up a Ranked Brawl queue where MMR is solely based on a deck-linked elo system then use the highest elo decks to redetermine what cards are actually good. I really don't understand how there could be good data on what scores cards should have if the only way matchmaking is happening is already through the system that uses seemingly arbitrarily decided numbers. I mean, I'm all for a system that tries to figure out your deck's "power level" in a format trying to emulate Commander, but it feels like I'm going to play Commander with friends and 4/5 times said friends are downplaying and/or lying about what their deck does being like "oh, it's just a silly 5 color pile that does janky stuff" and that "janky stuff" is ramping out Ultimatum to slam some of the worst stuff they can get away with.