Skip to content

DCarnage#32456

My feedback

6 results found

  1. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    DCarnage#32456 shared this idea  · 
  2. 2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    DCarnage#32456 shared this idea  · 
  3. Algorithm Improvement

    889 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    DCarnage#32456 commented  · 

    It's not an idea, it's a problem with the "flip a coin, who goes first". I have been tracking my deck tonight and I have played 40 games with a tracker. With a 26% on the play percentage. I learned that my tracker only calculates the games I start. I had given up before starting a game before accepting my hand which counts as going first so my "on the play" is actually lower than 26%.

    Seriously, stop favoring net decks and adhere to the coin flip. Technically the rate at which I get to go first is literally impossible. I have a better chance at winning the powerball lottery three times over than getting the odds of going first in MTGA. I uploaded my games played/lost and the percentage at which I went first. Yes, I lost a lot of games but to be fair, after the first 20 games of going second other than a few games, I conceded. From here on out, in regular play (not ranked) I will give up every other game that I don't go first. One game, I go second, the next I go first. If I go second two times in a row, I concede. I will continue to concede for 4-6 more games until I go first. If I go first two times in a row, I will go second two times in a row. All we want is a true 50/50 system in which we play/draw.

    At this point, I serious think that you have my account tagged to go second most of the time for complaints in the forums about bugs (specifically audio bugs that your programmers can't fix) to be fair, the audio has been better lately. But still chill out with your ****** "play first" algorithm.

    DCarnage#32456 supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    DCarnage#32456 commented  · 

    One Legion Angel in the deck but always draw it in the first 15 cards, always. Not just my opponents but me as well. Want logs? I have logs. It works out for me but the opponent as well. Fix your shuffler, we're tired of your... compost (trying to be PC and not trigger you).

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    DCarnage#32456 commented  · 

    This was all ranked. We are tired of bs.. To be honest, you will probably delete this whole thread because one exists somewhere or P.R. reasons or something. Seriously though stop stacking decks based on strong cards. We know you do it and it's freaking disgusting. All of the streamers I watch know it's true. CGB, LegenVD, MTG Malone, Crokeyz, Day9V, Sonio, Nizzahon Magic, Ali Eldrazi, Pootin, MTG Original Decks (Aka TheGreatWhitDragon), The Magic Historian, PowrDragn, MTGGoldfish, ChannelFireball, etc. Basically your programmers are horrible, stop it, get some help.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    DCarnage#32456 commented  · 

    The shuffler is fine... Seriously, stop it.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    DCarnage#32456 commented  · 

    By the end of the game they had 4 copies of Kami of Transience, 2 copies of Jukai Naturalist, 4 copies of Touch the Spirit Region, 3 copies of Commune with the Spirits... I mean, come on. Stop stacking the deck for already super strong decks.

  4. 542 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    DCarnage#32456 commented  · 

    Since the "wonderful" Alchemy set, there has been two patches which neither have fixed the sound issue that makes me think that either one of three things. One, they don't know about it even though everyone has reported it. Two, they don't care and just want to milk the players for money and don't give a **** about quality. Three, the programmers are so inept that they can't fix the issue. Personally, I believe it's number three because WotC loves money. Get some better programmer. Seriously, invest in people that know what they're doing and not equal opportunity hires because of some bs political ****.

  5. 54 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    DCarnage#32456 commented  · 

    The sound cuts out after a game or two and all I can hear is the music. This has been happening after the wonderful Alchemy update.

  6. 2,436 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    DCarnage#32456 commented  · 

    Agreed, Alchemy doesn't seem to rotate so what's the point of screwing up Historic? I can't wait until Explorer catches up to Pioneer and then you can mess up Historic...

    DCarnage#32456 supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base