garbag#70681
My feedback
10 results found
-
103 votesgarbag#70681 supported this idea ·
-
175 votesgarbag#70681 supported this idea ·
-
285 votesgarbag#70681 supported this idea ·
-
3 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment garbag#70681 shared this idea · -
3 votesgarbag#70681 shared this idea ·
-
25 votesgarbag#70681 supported this idea ·
-
31 votesgarbag#70681 supported this idea ·
-
3 votesgarbag#70681 shared this idea ·
-
3 votesgarbag#70681 shared this idea ·
-
945 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment garbag#70681 commentedHeres a suggestion. FIX YOUR ******* SHUFFLER FOR LIMITED EVENTS. There is NO legitimate reason for a deck with a ratio of 3:4 lands to spells, or 16:24 since math and statistics seem to be a foreign concept to you, to CONSISTENTLY, OVER 50% OF THE TIME YIELD AN ACTUAL DRAWN RATIO OF (>1):1. THE DECK INCLUDES 8 LESS LANDS THAN SPELLS, SO WHY DOES IT MORE OFTEN THAN NOT YIELD MORE LANDS THAN SPELLS? WHAT ******* "STATISTICS" DO YOU USE THAT MAKES 12 OF THE TOP 20 CARDS IN A 16LAND 40CARD DECK LANDS MORE OFTEN THAN ******* NOT?Losing game after game in a PAID EVENT, for no other reason than THIS KIND OF DOGSHIT "RANDOMIZATION" (read: broken shuffler concentrating literally 75% of lands in the top 50% of deck virtually very single game) is absurd. 6-3 record in draft, and ONLY TWO GAMES DID I DRAW LESS LAND THAN SPELLS. IN A DECK WITH 16, NOT EVEN 17 LAND. So, 7/9 games, or a WHOPPING 77% OF THE TIME, YOUR SHUFFLER OVERPRIORITIZES MORE LAND ON TOP THAN SPELLS. 77% of the time, a deck with LESS LAND THAN RECOMMENDED (i assume recommended since thats the autofill default AND conventionally what a 40card deck would use in real life), 77% of the time a deck like this STILL MASSIVELY FLOODS UNDER YOUR SHUFFLER. Nonsensical, ridiculous, does not line up with ANY TYPE OF REAL WORLD STATISTICAL ANALYSIS. Fix your land clumper, i mean shuffler already. Don't have anyone that actually knows statistics on your staff? I'll do your job for you, i have a background in stats.
garbag#70681 supported this idea ·An error occurred while saving the comment garbag#70681 commentedSo, heres the raw data: 3 draft games, 40 card deck, 17 lands. Game 1: keep 3 land hand, draw 4 land straight, game ends with 19 cards in deck, only 5 lands left in deck. Top 21 cards: 12 lands to 9 nonland. Ok, massive flood, it happens.
Game 2: keep 4 land hand w terramorphic to thin lands out. Game ends with 22 cards left in deck, 7 are land. Top 18 cards: 10 land, 8 nonland. Ouch, massive floods 2 for 2. I guess still loosely within expected variance/standard deviation, an outlier but sure.
Game 3: keep 3 land hand, game ends with 24 cards in library, only 6 lands. Top 16 cards: 11 land, only 5 nonland. Now, this flooding is way too consistent and repeatable to be simple "bad luck". Run a Poisson distribution on any 40-card deck, or really probably any deck regardless of size with the same ratio of lands to deck size of 17/40, in both the Arena client and a physical deck of cards, and you'll find Arena's results are EXTREMELY skewed from what should be expected under real-word probability models. Fix it, that is beyond absurd variance, if it can even be called variance at this point due to how consistent the results are.
Also, DONT RUN A METAGAME CHALLENGE OR ANY OTHER BEST OF 3 EVENTS TIL THIS IS FIXED.