Rezzahan#77802
My feedback
863 results found
-
1 vote
An error occurred while saving the comment -
1 vote
An error occurred while saving the comment Rezzahan#77802
commented
I suspect as Thalia, Heretic Cathar or something similar under your opponent's control.
-
1 vote
An error occurred while saving the comment Rezzahan#77802
commented
Were you buying MKM mythic packs? Because those are currently the only packs that advance the golden pack counter.
-
0 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Rezzahan#77802
commented
Read the cards carefully, ALL OF THEM say "it's controller creates a [...] token". So it is your opponent who creates the tokens and thus is their owner.
-
1 vote
An error occurred while saving the comment Rezzahan#77802
commented
Because it is an ability that targets your Rotpriest, not a spell. The spell has no target.
-
2 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Rezzahan#77802
commented
There are only two Shrines that can defeat your opponent with their abilities early in the turn: Shrine of Infinite Rage, and Sanctum of Stone Fangs. The later, however, triggers in your PRECOMBAT MAIN PHASE, not your upkeep. So only the former could have given you victory. Did you have a Shrine of Infinite Rage? Or only the too slow Sanctum of Stone Fangs?
-
0 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Rezzahan#77802
commented
New rule? No. An old card? Yes. He most likely had a Cavern of Souls set to Construct out, and cast the Servitor with colored mana from that. Hence it was uncounterable.
-
1 vote
An error occurred while saving the comment Rezzahan#77802
commented
Nothing wrong here. They controlled the Phoenic when it died, so they get the dies trigger. They then can collect evidence 4, and if they do, they get the totally new Phoenix back. There is no control change effect on that new Phoenix, they get to keep it. The old Phoenix, that one they would have to give back, but you killed it already.
-
1 vote
An error occurred while saving the comment Rezzahan#77802
commented
You have to tap the Cookie in order to activate the "gain 3 life ability". Since you attacked with it, it is already tapped, so you can't pay the activation cost. If you wanted to get rid of the Cookie this way, you shouldn't have attacked with it.
-
1 vote
An error occurred while saving the comment Rezzahan#77802
commented
Your creature died because it had 0 toughness, it wasn't destroyed. These are two different state based actions, the first simply puts the creature into the graveyard, the other destroys. Tamiyo's Safekeeping helps only against the later. Hexproof can help against targeted -X/-X effects, but I assume the -1/-1 in your example came from an untargeted source.
-
1 vote
An error occurred while saving the comment Rezzahan#77802
commented
Duplicate protection exists only for rares and mythics, and only when opening packs. Excess commons and uncommons give a tiny vault increase (+0.1% for a common, +0.3% for an uncommon). A 100% vault lets you claim 3 uncommon wildcards, 2 rare wildcards, and a mythic wildcard. Excess rares and mythics (if you have all that you can get from packs, or get one you have already completed as an ICR, etc.) give you some gems, 20 gems for an excess rare, 40 gems for an excess mythic.
-
2 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Rezzahan#77802
commented
That's because your Sword is all 5 colors due to the Leyline, and grants protection from two of those to the equipped creature. Thus immediately upon equipping state based actions see a protected creature with an equipment attached, that it is protected from, and unattach it due to being illegally attached.
-
7 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Rezzahan#77802
commented
Most likely because of a Tyvar, Jubilant Brawler on the field.
-
1 vote
An error occurred while saving the comment Rezzahan#77802
commented
You don't understand what first strike means. It only does two things:
1) create a second combat damage step in the combat phase if an attacking or blocking creature has this ability, and
2) make attacking and blocking creatures with first strike assign and deal combat damage during the first combat damage step while those without first strike or double strike have to wait for the second combat damage step.Since first strike only applies to the combat phase and combat damage, the ability does nothing during a fight, which is not combat. Even if the fight happens during the combat phase.
-
8 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Rezzahan#77802
commented
You CAN turn those kinds of cards face up, so that is what happens, no exile. And then the game sees state based actions that need performing, like putting an unattached aura into the graveyard, or a planeswalker with 0 loyalty.
Auras only target as spells, but there is no spell here, just a face down permanent turned face up.
-
1 vote
An error occurred while saving the comment Rezzahan#77802
commented
Are you sure it was a ward trigger? Was that on the stack? Personally, I think it more likely, that your opponent cast Vein Ripper with mana from Cavern of Souls, and that's why you were asked "are you sure?" and why the counter did nothing.
-
1 vote
An error occurred while saving the comment Rezzahan#77802
commented
You cannot sacrifice what you do not control. Since the effect makes YOU sacrifice the creatures, and you gave control over them away, no sacrifice is happening. YOU have to sacrifice (if you can), not your opponent.
-
1 vote
An error occurred while saving the comment Rezzahan#77802
commented
First, Skithiryx does not have any mana abilities. The term is reserved for abilities that PRODUCE mana (and fulfil some other criteria as well), it does not refer to abilities that COST mana.
Second, you being unable to use an ability during your opponent's turn is most likely due to an opponent's card's effect, probably Myrel, Shield of Argyve. Pay attention to your opponent's cards, they can and will affect what you can and cannot do.
-
0 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Rezzahan#77802
commented
And why should he get menace? Massacre Girl, Known Killer only gants wither to your creatures. She HAS menace, she doesn't GRANT it. Or did you turn him INTO a copy of Massacre Girl, Known Killer? Then he should be a Massacre Girl, Known Killer in all respects except name and the turn copy ability.
(Note, that Lazav does not transform. That word has a specific meaning in Magic and should only be used to refer to that specific action to avoid confusion.)
-
3 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Rezzahan#77802
commented
Niv-Mizzet looks at he card in the graveyard to determine wether he should give jump-start to it or not. That is strictly how the card is worded. What that card in the graveyard would look like on the stack is not relevant to Niv-Mizzet granting jump-start to the card. For that its colors in the graveyard are important, and it being an instant or sorcery in that zone. In the graveyard split cards are all of the colors of the two halves combined, that's why Cease//Desist doesn't get jump-start (it has 3 colors not just 2), and that's why Consign//Oblivion does get jump-start (it has exactly 2 colors, despite each half being monocolored).
Neither Oakhame Ranger nor Kellan should get jump-start from Niv-Mizzet when in the graveyard. Because there those are only creature cards, the adventure characteristics are treated as nonexistent.
(715.4. In every zone except the stack, and while on the stack not as an Adventure, an adventurer card
has only its normal characteristics.)So how do the two adventurer cards interact differently with Niv-Mizzet? Both shouldn't interact with him at all.
To sacrifice the enchantment (not one of the tokens), you have to have a legal target, which must be an attacking creature token. So you can only use that ability during combat after attackers have been declared.