Skip to content

Muggle_of_the_Coast#19144

My feedback

10 results found

  1. 2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Muggle_of_the_Coast#19144 commented  · 

    Did you by chance also have a Soul-Scar Mage (or some other effect that gives your spells wither) in play?

    Soul-Scar's ability replaces damage by -1/-1 counters. This negates deathtouch (the creature isn't damaged, so there's no deathtouch damage to kill the creature), and would also explain the damage seeming to stay around after the turn is over.

  2. 2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Muggle_of_the_Coast#19144 supported this idea  · 
  3. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Muggle_of_the_Coast#19144 commented  · 

    Opponent has Karn, the Great Creator in play. That card has a static ability "Activated abilities of artifacts your opponents control can't be activated."

    Sacrificing a treasure token for mana is an activated ability of an artifact. As long as Karn is in play, you can't do it.

  4. 10 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Muggle_of_the_Coast#19144 supported this idea  · 
  5. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Muggle_of_the_Coast#19144 commented  · 

    Most common way this happens is if opponent has a Containment Priest or similar card in play that keeps the exiled creature from returning to play.

  6. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Muggle_of_the_Coast#19144 commented  · 

    "Attacking Creatures" is not the same as "a creature attacks".

    The latter refers specifically to creatures chosen as attackers during the declare attackers phase. Any creatures entering after that point (including by Mobilize) don't trigger Revenge of Ravens.

  7. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Muggle_of_the_Coast#19144 commented  · 

    Was the creature Cloud, Midgar Mercenary? If so, the ward from the Sheltered by Ghosts triggers twice. So even if you pay 2 once, the second ward still gets you.

  8. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Muggle_of_the_Coast#19144 commented  · 

    In a player's hand, on the battlefield, or in any other zone but the stack, Wan Shi Tong has CMC 2.

    But on the stack the CMC is determined by the value of X the spell is being cast for. Is X anything other than 0? Then the CMC on the stack isn't 2, and Spell Snare can't target it.

  9. 5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Muggle_of_the_Coast#19144 supported this idea  · 
  10. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Muggle_of_the_Coast#19144 commented  · 

    The precise wording from the comprehensive rules (rule 704.5s) is

    "If the number of lore counters on a Saga permanent with one or more chapter abilities is greater than or equal to its final chapter number and it isn’t the source of a chapter ability that has triggered but not yet left the stack, that Saga’s controller sacrifices it."

    If a Saga creature loses all abilities, then it is no longer "a saga permanent with one or more chapter abilities", so the sacrifice clause no longer applies.

    The same is true of rule 714.4 regarding saga sacrifices -- it specifically references sagas that have one or more chapter abilities.