Muggle_of_the_Coast#19144
My feedback
13 results found
-
10 votesMuggle_of_the_Coast#19144
supported this idea
·
-
1 vote
An error occurred while saving the comment -
1 vote
An error occurred while saving the comment Muggle_of_the_Coast#19144
commented
"Attacking Creatures" is not the same as "a creature attacks".
The latter refers specifically to creatures chosen as attackers during the declare attackers phase. Any creatures entering after that point (including by Mobilize) don't trigger Revenge of Ravens.
-
1 vote
An error occurred while saving the comment Muggle_of_the_Coast#19144
commented
Was the creature Cloud, Midgar Mercenary? If so, the ward from the Sheltered by Ghosts triggers twice. So even if you pay 2 once, the second ward still gets you.
-
1 vote
An error occurred while saving the comment Muggle_of_the_Coast#19144
commented
In a player's hand, on the battlefield, or in any other zone but the stack, Wan Shi Tong has CMC 2.
But on the stack the CMC is determined by the value of X the spell is being cast for. Is X anything other than 0? Then the CMC on the stack isn't 2, and Spell Snare can't target it.
-
3 votesMuggle_of_the_Coast#19144
supported this idea
·
-
1 vote
An error occurred while saving the comment Muggle_of_the_Coast#19144
commented
The precise wording from the comprehensive rules (rule 704.5s) is
"If the number of lore counters on a Saga permanent with one or more chapter abilities is greater than or equal to its final chapter number and it isn’t the source of a chapter ability that has triggered but not yet left the stack, that Saga’s controller sacrifices it."
If a Saga creature loses all abilities, then it is no longer "a saga permanent with one or more chapter abilities", so the sacrifice clause no longer applies.
The same is true of rule 714.4 regarding saga sacrifices -- it specifically references sagas that have one or more chapter abilities.
-
18 votesMuggle_of_the_Coast#19144
supported this idea
·
-
1 vote
An error occurred while saving the comment Muggle_of_the_Coast#19144
commented
Doesn't seem to be a bug.
Bloodletter only doubles life loss occurring during your turn. If opponent draws a card on their turn, they still only lose 1 life.
-
1 vote
An error occurred while saving the comment Muggle_of_the_Coast#19144
commented
It's not opponent using Fountainport to pay for its own ability -- it's opponent using Sunken Citadel to pay for it.
That land has an ability that can add 2 mana instead of 1 (with the caveat that the mana be used to pay for abilities of land sources like Fountainport). So it looks like opponent's tapping one less land than they're supposed to.
-
28 votesMuggle_of_the_Coast#19144
supported this idea
·
-
13 votesMuggle_of_the_Coast#19144
supported this idea
·
-
12 votesMuggle_of_the_Coast#19144
shared this idea
·
Most common way this happens is if opponent has a Containment Priest or similar card in play that keeps the exiled creature from returning to play.