Ban Omniscience
Ban Omniscience, I have been playing magic since 1994 plus. I play this game because I think It's the best game ever created by men! Even if the game has major flaws, we love to play it for it's richeness, it's art, it's complexity but some flaws have to be corrected one of them is that there is no worst feeling then playing against a non interactive deck that also takes forever to set up and you no longer get to play the game knowing that you have to sit there for 10 mins until it concludes. Banning card is not only a question of performance or prevalence in decks it has to be the same way in terms of interaction and gameplay! Ante was banned, Chaos Orb was banned and recently even words, racial connotations were too for those reasons exactly it does not make the gamefun. It's not because you can build it and it works that it's enjoyable and that it should be brought to the table the same way that you dont go out to show of your big **** in the park if you want to play solitary keep it at home *************!
-
bonsai#70698
commented
I don't agree with the card ban comparisons, but I do feel in a meta with so much graveyard sneak-play Omniscience is OP. Similarly, Deep Cavern Bat is a solid card, but it would not get nearly as much play if the meta wasn't already too heavily skewed with hand-hate.
Honestly, the meta is so unfun atm (mostly due to lack of interaction and effective turn-3 wins), I've just stopped playing against a few cards and a few decks.
It's just not worth my precious game-play-time to have unfun non-interaction for the entire length of a Bo3 match.
I just concluded a Bo3 against a non-optimal hand-hate deck. Given so much 1-for-1-ing, hand visibility, and removal, we were both top-decking each game after turn 5 with near-perfect information.
There was, effectively, zero decision-making and zero board-state for the vast majority of each game.
Does that sound like fun to anyone?!