Iroh
Iroh, Tea Master card has a fault in its coding.
Card says you MAY give an opponent control of a permanent you control...
Currently online MTG REQUIRES you to give an opponent control of a permanent. It does not let you 'submit 0.' Also, during one game where I was forced to give control of an item (dual swords), the artifact remained attached to one of my creatures while also giving me a token. Overall, a very buggy card.
Please review.
Norse Berserker#77976
shared this idea
-
Rezzahan#77802
commented
The card works fine, you just don't understand how it works. You HAVE to choose a target for the trigger, that is MANDATORY for any trigger being put on the stack, and you cannot refuse to put it on the stack. You cannot choose zero targets, the trigger rquires one target. The "may" choice is made on RESOLUTION. It is then that you choose not to execute the control change. That is how the rules say the game works.
Control change of equipment does not make it fall off. It stays attached until its controller attaches it to something else, or the creature it's attached to leaves the battlefield or stops being a creature. Changing control of it just changes WHO can use the equip ability. But until the new controller does, nothing makes it move. On a sidenote, if the equipment happens to be one of the elementary Swords, the new controller will get the benefits of the triggers, even if it remains attached to your creature.