Strengthening the response to players who hinder the progress of the game
When it is certain that they will lose, some players will not surrender but will instead wait until their time runs out. In this case, the player who is sure to win has no choice but to wait for the excessively long time until the timeout, which hinders the smooth progress of the game.
From my experience, 50-60% of players have this characteristic.
For this reason, I would like to see a function to allow players to be designated as NG players, and a flow to allow administrators to ban such players by sending a log when they encounter them.
(This is an automatic translation, so I apologize if there are any problems with the text.)
jnfn#82943
shared this idea
-
kirurumaru#56365
commented
Bueno, leyendo tu comentario sobre los jugadores que no se rinden y cómo esto afecta el flujo del juego, me recordó que a veces uno necesita un pequeño descanso de situaciones frustrantes o de esperar demasiado. Por eso descubrí https://vegas-hero.es y me llamó la atención que para jugadores de España las secciones de casino son fáciles de usar y ofrecen un momento divertido para desconectar. Probé primero una tragaperras sencilla, al principio sin suerte, pero al arriesgar un poco más llegó un giro que me dio una buena ganancia. Esa pausa breve me permitió relajarme y retomar otras actividades con más calma y energía.
-
bonsai#70698
commented
Amen. I've be lobbying for a set of player moderation tools for years. Atm, I simply keep a list of known "bad actors" and refuse to play with them. It used to be 12. Sadly, it's now ballooned to 92 in just the past 6 months. Without moderation, this is what happens to a player-base.