165 results found

1. Opening Banned Cards is not good

   If you can compensate owners of banned cards with wildcards, then you absolutely should compensate openers of the banned card with wildcards or prevent the banned card from appearing in packs. Both solutions can easily be implemented. I guess it is more important to WotC that I am forced to pay for and open 1 more pack than keeping me as a customer.

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

2. Starter deck game sucks at the moment

   I’ve just played 10 games in a row in the starter deck challenge trying to meet my daily win goal. 10 times in a row I had anywhere from a decent hand to good, and was paired against someone with the perfect synergies hand. WTF. I’m not the best magic player in the world, but ****, how are my card draws awful 70-80 percent of the time, and my opponent has a perfect synergy 70-80 percent of my games. Something has to be corrected in the matchmaking or card draws or something. This is ridiculous, and I’m thinking I’m just gonna stick with the physical game. I’ve spent money on this game and like to play for fun when I’m not having any live game sessisions. I’m sure I’m not the only player that feels this watch, in fact I know I’m not cause I’ve seen this same comment I’m making on several threads and posts. Just wanting to give some positive criticism, I’d like to keep playing your game, but I don’t think I’m going to. This is so frustrating it’s not worth the effort to try and get the daily goals.

   I’ve just played 10 games in a row in the starter deck challenge trying to meet my daily win goal. 10 times in a row I had anywhere from a decent hand to good, and was paired against someone with the perfect synergies hand. WTF. I’m not the best magic player in the world, but ****, how are my card draws awful 70-80 percent of the time, and my opponent has a perfect synergy 70-80 percent of my games. Something has to be corrected in the matchmaking or card draws or something. This is ridiculous, and I’m thinking I’m just… more

   2 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

3. Chris Rahn Artwork for "Sword of..." Card Styles

   I would love to see the origian Chris Rahn artworks offered as Card Styles for "Sword of Hearth and Home," "Sword of Sinew and Steel," and "Sword of Fire and Ice." The full set matches so nicely and I would love to be able to complete it in MTG Arena!

   •  

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

4. MMR is overriding deck power too heavily in Brawl matchmaking

   I am also submitting feedback that MMR appears to be weighted too heavily compared to actual deck power in Brawl matchmaking.

   The current system seems to punish players for winning games with casual or fun decks. A deck may start out receiving appropriate matchups based on its actual power level, but after winning some games, the matchmaking appears to push that deck into queues against highly optimized lists, tutor-heavy decks, ramp shells, control shells, stax pieces, and combo engines that are far beyond the deck’s intended power level.

   This creates a frustrating experience because a casual deck that is capable of winning some games is not the same thing as an optimized high-power deck. Winning with a lower-powered or more casual deck should not cause the player to be repeatedly matched against decks with much higher consistency, stronger card quality, more tutors, more ramp, or more oppressive game plans.

   Brawl matchmaking should prioritize deck construction and actual deck power more heavily than player MMR. MMR may be useful as one factor, but it should not override deck-strength weighting to the point that a casual deck is effectively punished for performing well.

   Please review whether Brawl matchmaking is placing too much emphasis on MMR relative to deck power. The system should distinguish between a truly optimized deck and a casual deck that happens to win games through normal gameplay.

   I am also submitting feedback that MMR appears to be weighted too heavily compared to actual deck power in Brawl matchmaking.

   The current system seems to punish players for winning games with casual or fun decks. A deck may start out receiving appropriate matchups based on its actual power level, but after winning some games, the matchmaking appears to push that deck into queues against highly optimized lists, tutor-heavy decks, ramp shells, control shells, stax pieces, and combo engines that are far beyond the deck’s intended power level.

   This creates a frustrating experience because a casual deck that is capable… more

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

5. Winter Orb should be banned from Brawl

   I am also submitting feedback that Winter Orb should be banned from Brawl.

   Winter Orb creates an extremely unhealthy play pattern in a casual singleton format. The card does not create interesting gameplay or meaningful back-and-forth interaction. Instead, it prevents players from actually playing the game by locking down mana development and dragging matches into repetitive, frustrating board states.

   This is especially problematic in Brawl because players always have access to a commander, and certain decks can build around Winter Orb far more effectively than the opponent can reasonably prepare for in best-of-one matchmaking. Decks that abuse Winter Orb can use mana rocks, cheap commanders, untap effects, or asymmetrical board states to continue progressing while the opposing player is effectively locked out.

   Even when Winter Orb does not immediately win the game, it creates the kind of non-game experience that should not be encouraged in Brawl. A card that primarily functions to deny resources and prevent normal gameplay is a poor fit for the format, especially when matchmaking can pair it against casual or lower-powered decks that are not built to handle prison/stax strategies.

   Please review Winter Orb’s legality in Brawl. I believe it should be banned because it promotes unfun, non-interactive gameplay and creates matchups where one player is prevented from meaningfully participating.

   I am also submitting feedback that Winter Orb should be banned from Brawl.

   Winter Orb creates an extremely unhealthy play pattern in a casual singleton format. The card does not create interesting gameplay or meaningful back-and-forth interaction. Instead, it prevents players from actually playing the game by locking down mana development and dragging matches into repetitive, frustrating board states.

   This is especially problematic in Brawl because players always have access to a commander, and certain decks can build around Winter Orb far more effectively than the opponent can reasonably prepare for in best-of-one matchmaking. Decks that abuse Winter Orb can… more

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

6. Paradox Engine should be banned or heavily reweighted in Brawl matchmaking

   I am also submitting feedback that Paradox Engine should either be banned in Brawl or weighted much more heavily in matchmaking.

   Paradox Engine creates the exact type of gameplay that Brawl matchmaking should be trying to prevent: repetitive, non-interactive turns where one player chains mana rocks, spells, activated abilities, and commander synergies until the game effectively ends. Even when it does not win immediately, it often creates a board state where the opposing player is forced to sit through an extended sequence with little or no meaningful interaction.

   This card is especially problematic in Brawl because commander access and singleton deck construction make certain engines much easier to build around than they may appear from card weighting alone. In practice, Paradox Engine is not just a strong value card. It is a combo engine that can turn ordinary mana rocks and utility creatures into explosive, game-ending sequences.

   If Paradox Engine is going to remain legal, it should be treated as a major power-level indicator in matchmaking. Decks running Paradox Engine should be weighted significantly higher and matched primarily against other high-powered or combo-oriented decks. It should not be allowed to appear in matchups against casual, lower-consistency, or non-combo Brawl decks as if it were a normal artifact value card.

   Please review Paradox Engine’s legality and matchmaking weight in Brawl. I believe it is either ban-worthy or currently underweighted relative to its actual impact on games.

   I am also submitting feedback that Paradox Engine should either be banned in Brawl or weighted much more heavily in matchmaking.

   Paradox Engine creates the exact type of gameplay that Brawl matchmaking should be trying to prevent: repetitive, non-interactive turns where one player chains mana rocks, spells, activated abilities, and commander synergies until the game effectively ends. Even when it does not win immediately, it often creates a board state where the opposing player is forced to sit through an extended sequence with little or no meaningful interaction.

   This card is especially problematic in Brawl because commander access and singleton… more

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

7. Optimized control shells are underweighted in Brawl matchmaking, especially Azorius

   I believe this issue may apply to multiple color combinations, but Azorius control appears to be one of the worst offenders.

   Many players are able to build highly optimized control shells around seemingly random or less threatening blue-white commanders. In these cases, the commander itself may not appear especially powerful, but the actual deck is still a best-version control list built around efficient counterspells, board wipes, premium removal, card draw, planeswalkers, and inevitability.

   This creates a serious matchmaking issue because the deck may be underweighted based on the commander, while the actual 99-card construction is far stronger than the commander suggests. In practice, the commander is often secondary. The real power comes from the density of control tools and the ability to prevent the opposing deck from meaningfully playing the game.

   Brawl matchmaking should account more heavily for optimized archetype density, not just commander identity. Decks running a high concentration of premium counterspells, sweepers, removal, and card advantage should be treated as high-powered control decks regardless of whether the commander appears casual, unusual, or low-priority.

   Please review how optimized control shells are weighted in Brawl matchmaking, especially Azorius decks using less obvious commanders to access the strongest blue-white control packages.

   I believe this issue may apply to multiple color combinations, but Azorius control appears to be one of the worst offenders.

   Many players are able to build highly optimized control shells around seemingly random or less threatening blue-white commanders. In these cases, the commander itself may not appear especially powerful, but the actual deck is still a best-version control list built around efficient counterspells, board wipes, premium removal, card draw, planeswalkers, and inevitability.

   This creates a serious matchmaking issue because the deck may be underweighted based on the commander, while the actual 99-card construction is far stronger than the commander… more

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

8. Simic and green ramp decks appear underweighted in Brawl matchmaking

   Dear MTG Arena Support Team,

   I am writing to submit feedback regarding Brawl matchmaking and deck weighting, specifically concerning Simic and green-based ramp decks.

   In my experience, Simic and green ramp strategies appear to be significantly underweighted in Brawl matchmaking. These decks are often matched against much lower-powered or slower decks despite having access to explosive mana acceleration, consistent card advantage, oversized threats, and the ability to quickly outpace normal gameplay.

   Green ramp has an outsized impact in Brawl because the format is singleton and games often revolve around tempo, commander access, and resource development. A deck that can consistently accelerate ahead by multiple turns is not playing on the same axis as decks that are developing at a normal rate. This becomes especially problematic when those ramp decks also have access to blue interaction, card draw, bounce, counterspells, or value engines.

   Simic decks in particular can combine green’s mana acceleration with blue’s ability to protect threats, draw cards, and disrupt opponents. This creates matchups where the ramp deck is able to build an overwhelming board or cast high-impact spells far earlier than the opposing deck can reasonably respond.

   Please review how Brawl matchmaking weights green ramp decks, especially Simic commanders and decks running heavy mana acceleration. Ramp density, early-game mana production, land acceleration, and the ability to consistently jump ahead on mana should be weighted more heavily when determining deck strength.

   These decks should be matched more frequently against other high-powered Brawl decks rather than slower, casual, or lower-consistency decks that cannot realistically keep pace with repeated early ramp.

   Thank you for your time and consideration.

   Dear MTG Arena Support Team,

   I am writing to submit feedback regarding Brawl matchmaking and deck weighting, specifically concerning Simic and green-based ramp decks.

   In my experience, Simic and green ramp strategies appear to be significantly underweighted in Brawl matchmaking. These decks are often matched against much lower-powered or slower decks despite having access to explosive mana acceleration, consistent card advantage, oversized threats, and the ability to quickly outpace normal gameplay.

   Green ramp has an outsized impact in Brawl because the format is singleton and games often revolve around tempo, commander access, and resource development. A deck that can consistently… more

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

9. Tutor-heavy Brawl decks appear incorrectly weighted in matchmaking

   Dear MTG Arena Support Team,

   I am writing to submit feedback regarding Brawl matchmaking and deck weighting, specifically concerning decks that run multiple tutor effects.

   In my experience, Brawl decks with access to repeated or highly efficient tutors appear to be under-weighted by the matchmaking system. These decks are often able to consistently find their strongest cards, combo pieces, removal, or win conditions, which makes them significantly more powerful and reliable than decks without similar access to tutors.

   Because Brawl is a singleton format, tutors have an outsized impact on gameplay. They reduce the natural variance of the format and allow certain decks to play much more consistently than their apparent commander or card pool strength would suggest. When these decks are matched against lower-powered or more casual Brawl decks, the games often feel lopsided and unfair.

   I believe the matchmaking system should place greater weight on decks that include multiple tutor effects, especially low-cost or repeatable tutors, and decks where tutors directly enable combos or highly consistent win conditions. These decks should be matched more frequently against other high-powered Brawl decks rather than lower-powered commanders.

   Please review how tutor-heavy Brawl decks are currently weighted in matchmaking and consider adjusting their matchmaking value to better reflect their actual in-game power level.

   Thank you for your time and consideration.

   Dear MTG Arena Support Team,

   I am writing to submit feedback regarding Brawl matchmaking and deck weighting, specifically concerning decks that run multiple tutor effects.

   In my experience, Brawl decks with access to repeated or highly efficient tutors appear to be under-weighted by the matchmaking system. These decks are often able to consistently find their strongest cards, combo pieces, removal, or win conditions, which makes them significantly more powerful and reliable than decks without similar access to tutors.

   Because Brawl is a singleton format, tutors have an outsized impact on gameplay. They reduce the natural variance of the format and… more

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

10. Hei Bai appears incorrectly weighted in Brawl matchmaking

    Dear MTG Arena Support Team,

    I am writing to submit a formal complaint regarding the current matchmaking placement of Hei Bai in Brawl.

    Based on its power level, consistency, and impact on games, Hei Bai appears to be significantly stronger than the commanders it is currently being matched against. In my experience, it is frequently being paired into lower-powered Brawl queues where the matchup feels inappropriate and heavily unbalanced. This creates a frustrating play experience, as the deck’s strength seems much closer to commanders that are typically placed in the so-called “**** Queue.”

    I believe Hei Bai is currently being under-weighted by the matchmaking system and should be reviewed for placement into a higher matchmaking tier. At minimum, its matchmaking weight should be adjusted so that it is more consistently paired against commanders of comparable strength.

    Please review Hei Bai’s current Brawl matchmaking classification and consider whether it should be moved into **** Queue or otherwise weighted more heavily to prevent unfair matchups against lower-powered commanders.

    Thank you for your time and consideration.

    Dear MTG Arena Support Team,

    I am writing to submit a formal complaint regarding the current matchmaking placement of Hei Bai in Brawl.

    Based on its power level, consistency, and impact on games, Hei Bai appears to be significantly stronger than the commanders it is currently being matched against. In my experience, it is frequently being paired into lower-powered Brawl queues where the matchup feels inappropriate and heavily unbalanced. This creates a frustrating play experience, as the deck’s strength seems much closer to commanders that are typically placed in the so-called “**** Queue.”

    I believe Hei Bai is currently being… more

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

11. Ошибка при разрешении комбинации победной

    При разрешении комбинации, должен выиграть, - игра зависла, затем передан ход оппоненту, и он бесконечно стал ходить. Я выигрывал этой атакой, а из-за ошибки проиграл. Исправьте тайминги и таймер когда разрешается комбинация. Я не виноват, что у вас десять миллионов токенов нельзя создать из-за плохих программистов.

    • 

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

12. Targeting UI Design Flaw Lost Me the Game

    I cast Impractical Joke while I had an Aziza, Mage Tower Captain in play. I targeted one of two 3/3 Fractal tokens for the burn spell, and then copied it with Aziza. I wanted to target the second, separate Fractal token but I couldn’t tell from the UI which Fractal my first spell had targeted. I had to guess which Fractal to target with my copied spell. I ended up targeting the same, initial Fractal because I couldn’t tell which one was not already targeted. This was the difference between me delivering lethal damage or not, and I then lost the game a few turns later. Very frustrating! A better UI would make it easy for the player to see which spells on the stack have targeted which creatures.

    I cast Impractical Joke while I had an Aziza, Mage Tower Captain in play. I targeted one of two 3/3 Fractal tokens for the burn spell, and then copied it with Aziza. I wanted to target the second, separate Fractal token but I couldn’t tell from the UI which Fractal my first spell had targeted. I had to guess which Fractal to target with my copied spell. I ended up targeting the same, initial Fractal because I couldn’t tell which one was not already targeted. This was the difference between me delivering lethal damage or not, and I then lost… more

    2 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

13. Would like to see some more 3d parallax cards

    Specifically the Marvel Spider Man set, but there are several out there that shouldn't have any licensing issues attached, they're just sitting there collecting dust instead of gems or gold like they could be. Examples: Sephiroth, Fabled Soldier; Leyline Tyrant; a handful of cards from Last Airbender.

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

14. loading screen freeze

    I tried downloading the game but it always gets stuck on the loading screen I feel like I've tried everything but nothing works I always get back to the starting problem it loads the game and gets stuck on the loading screen with the mtg logo onI tried downloading the game, but it always gets stuck on the loading screen. I feel like I've tried everything, but nothing works. I always get back to the starting problem. It loads the game and gets stuck on the loading screen with the MTG logo on it.

    •  

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

15. doppelgang on honest work doesnt work - why?

    I am making nine copies of opponents honest work aura with Doppelgang and the submit button is greyed out. Why???
    I also cannot go back or cancel - and consequently lost the game.
    This should be fixed - I was winning and due a silly bug I lost instead.

    •  

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

16. Witness Protection on Ragost Deft Gastronaut still grants artifacts Food and Sac for Life

    I played Witness Protection on Ragost Deft Gastronaut (or commander of similar name, costs 1 red 1 white) and yet their artifacts still all gained the Food subtype and the ability to sac for life.

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

17. Modern 2015 Expansion/Anthology

    Wizards of the Coast,

    Please curate an expansion/anthology of cards that can allow me to build/play meta decks within the Modern 2015 format (8th edition to Magic Origins) on MTGA. Many cards have already been included/reprinted in MTGA; we just need a little bit more.

    https://www.2015modern.com

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

18. Opposition agent and fetchland

    Playing in competitive brawl on an iPhone, end of turn my opponent cracks their fetchland and I cast opposition agent in response. Opposition agent resolves and I am able to look through my opponents deck but am unable to pick a land in order to resolve the fetch nor am I able to fail to find. This ends up timing me out during the resolution of the fetchland causing me to time out and be considered afk losing the game. I was busy trying anything too resolve the stack and didn’t take screenshots.

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

19. Deadpool, Trading card

    With the release of Marvel superhero’s, as well as the release of spider and the marvel full art cards. I was wondering the complexity and process to release the Deadpool, trading card into MTG Arena.

    •  

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

20. Badgermole cub deck

    Could someone please explain to me what to do in the following situation when im on the draw?
    Opponent turn 1
    Land, gene pollinator
    Turn 2
    Land, badgermole cub, mockingbird
    Turn 3
    Ouroboroid, ourobouroid.

    I have 2 lands. I shoot the sheriff the first ouroboroid then lose spectacularly. I struggle to imagine literally any combination of cards in standard that arent "gimp yourself agaisnt every other deck by playing 4x spell snare and pray" that realistically gets out of this situation.

    Its really absurd that BMC hasn't been banned yet.

    3 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating