Add a rule requiring to pay 1 mana for each triggered ability which is triggered from itself (directly or through several triggered ability steps).

Yeah this is just poor design that doesn't feel good in the player side to just watch 2 cards infinite 40 life away one at a time. Sure there are quick build combos... But they can be answered with luck. These are just cheap win mechanics that spoil the game.

While I am relatively new to Magic, I was playing MTG Arena yesterday and was doing just fine until they hit me with Enduring Tenacity/Bloodthirsty Conqueror infinite life gain combo. Literally sucks the life out of the game. Why is this legal in standard? I understand that "it's a part of the game", but what if it sucks? Thanks.

It is patently ridiculous to ban an entire archetype, and if I'm being honest, it sounds like you're just letting your emotions get the better of you.

Infinite combo decks make up very little of the meta. In vintage and standard, there are no tier-1 combo decks. In legacy and modern, there is as single tier-1 combo deck each. Combos don't dominate to any degree. They're incredibly vulnerable to disruption, they fall apart to the average sideboard, and in formats like commander, they're hard to set up while several other players are watching. They're just not good. There's no reason to ban cards that aren't performing well.

I noticed you're also asking for people to stop using alternate win-cons, planeswalkers, net-decks, and cards they know are "broken." The brutal truth is this: Nobody will ever voluntarily build a weaker deck just so you can have more fun. If I'm organizing a basketball team, I'm not gonna pick a bunch of 4'5" guys with breathing problems because my opponent gets mad when I try to draft LeBron James.

You say that "A stronger fighter (i.e. the best players) should look for a challenge to win, not take the easy way out." By asking for concessions, you're trying to take the easy way out. You're rejecting a challenge. A win is supposed to be challenging not because your opponent is going easy on you. A win is supposed to be challenging because both players are trying their best.

Never in my life have I seen this many infinite combos in the game. It's truly absurd how much a game of solitaire MTG has become.

Finite combos also need to be banned such as those found in the current Dimir Bounce deck. They are all too powerful and often just lead to one player playing solitaire while you sit back waiting for your turn. Really bad game design. Just as bad as printing cards that enable red to consistently win in 3-5 turns.

they need to be banned - really a major drag on the game, deflates any sense of fair game play.

they were part of the game long before any of you played this game. yes sometimes annoying but mostly not so consistent that it destroys the game

Womp womp dude. Infinite combos helped start magic and are what makes formats great. Banning combo decks would make magic SO boring. All I see people like you as are old men crying that they can't play their 5 mana 4/4 creatures with no abilities anymore. Like grow up and just deal with it, and wotc agrees with me.

Infinite combos are a sign of bad game design. If you ban them, it shows that you understand how to fix your mistakes. It might make people believe that WotC isn't a completely incompetent company. After the Pinkerton incident and the MTG30 disaster, you might consider doing as much as you can to gain good will from the community; you know, the people that buy your products and keep this game alive.

Yes. Ban these things. They breed lazy no skill players, it takes away from the game.

Ban infinite combos. Theyre a lazy way to win. No where else in any fantasy, sci-fi, horror (etc.) setting can you go from limited resources to unlimited. Everything has to have a cost.