196 results found

1. game feels overly rigged

   Opponents constantly top deck exactly perfect draws at the perfect times. just played back to back games where I stabilized and WHOA! they immediately go land game winning 7 drop after doing nothing for several turns and without scrying or surveiling. Then there are all the games where my opponent hits land 5 or 6 then never draws a land again and has all castable perfect answers the rest of the way while I miraculously draw 15 out of my 17 lands with 15 cards left in deck. I get Magic is a game of variance, but this consistently happens and almost never in my favor. I'm sick of spending money on your rigged client, and have deleted it from my computer. Good job losing a paying customer with your poor and rigged coding.

   Opponents constantly top deck exactly perfect draws at the perfect times. just played back to back games where I stabilized and WHOA! they immediately go land game winning 7 drop after doing nothing for several turns and without scrying or surveiling. Then there are all the games where my opponent hits land 5 or 6 then never draws a land again and has all castable perfect answers the rest of the way while I miraculously draw 15 out of my 17 lands with 15 cards left in deck. I get Magic is a game of variance, but this consistently happens… more

   4 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

2. Feedback on the In-Game Player Reporting Feature - Request for Transparency and a System Feedback Channel

   To the MTG Arena Team,

   I am writing as a player to share serious concerns regarding the in-game player reporting feature and the partnership with GGWP announced on August 18, 2026. I would like to request improvements and clarification on the following points.

   1. Overemphasis on Monitoring Player Behavior ("Results") While Overlooking the Environmental Design That Causes Frustration ("Cause")
      The newly added reporting categories (such as roping/stalling and abusive language) only address the symptoms of issues in the competitive environment. The underlying reasons why many players experience stress and resort to unsportsmanlike conduct are deeply connected to platform-side factors: a lack of transparency regarding matchmaking algorithms and probability fairness, long-standing doubts within the community that have never been fully addressed, and communication features that can easily be perceived as taunting.
      Before focusing solely on monitoring and penalizing player behavior with external tools, I believe you should also re-evaluate the game design and competitive environment itself that is causing this frustration.

   2. Lack of a Feedback Channel for Platform-Side Quality Issues and Bugs
      The current reporting feature is limited to monitoring behavior between players. There is no dedicated channel for providing feedback on the platform provider's responsibility, such as "questions about system behavior," "transparency of matchmaking logic," or "long-standing bugs."
      This approach, which appears to set aside accountability for quality control and instead frames all issues as conflicts between players, raises serious concerns.

   3. Risk of Feedback Becoming Siloed and the Need for Transparency
      A design where reports are processed individually and privately within the client risks creating a black box that prevents the community from collectively understanding and discussing issues.
      To resolve distrust and build a truly healthy competitive environment, I believe transparent communication is necessary, including reports on how issues are handled and objective data regarding the fairness of algorithms and probability systems.

   Conclusion
   To protect the integrity of Magic: The Gathering as a historic competitive game, I strongly urge you to go beyond introducing superficial monitoring tools and to make a genuine commitment to fairness and transparency so that players can play with confidence.

   Sincerely,

   To the MTG Arena Team,

   I am writing as a player to share serious concerns regarding the in-game player reporting feature and the partnership with GGWP announced on August 18, 2026. I would like to request improvements and clarification on the following points.

   1. Overemphasis on Monitoring Player Behavior ("Results") While Overlooking the Environmental Design That Causes Frustration ("Cause")
      The newly added reporting categories (such as roping/stalling and abusive language) only address the symptoms of issues in the competitive environment. The underlying reasons why many players experience stress and resort to unsportsmanlike conduct are deeply connected to platform-side factors: a lack… more

   4 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   1 comment  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

3. Add Universes Beyond: Warhammer 40,000 Cards to MTG Arena

   I would love to see the Warhammer 40,000 Universes Beyond cards added to MTG Arena. The 40k Commander decks were massive hits in paper Magic, and bringing those cards to digital play—whether through a dedicated Historic Anthology set, draftable sets, or Timeless/Historic legal formats—would be an incredible addition to the game.

   4 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

4. Bug

   I played barrensteppe siege in a ranked match on Android an my game froze causing me to lose the match. This happened to me twice place fix.
   2026.62.0.6729.1304277

   5 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

5. Option to speed up or entirely skip long sets of triggers & animations

   There are many ways to put 20-40 triggers on the stack even without going infinite. When these triggers don't fizzle, each one has a dedicated animation that plays as it resolves, and the end result over multiple turns is a very tedious process of waiting for the game to resolve stuff neither my opponent or I can actually effect.
   There should be an option to disable animations completely or choose to skip them (such as the animation for conjure in alchemy) so that my opponents and I are not bogged down by long strings of repetitive animations

   •  

   •  

   4 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

6. Rigged

   How can you call this magic the gathering? This is nothing more than money-grubbing. I could have the best possible deck that I've ever drafted and go Owen three, and later draft mediocre at best and win all seven rounds. I don't think you mother f****** really understand him just how smart the players are. If your response is that the money speaks for itself, just remember that you're cheapening every other instance of this game by allowing this one to be this f***** up. In all seriousness, stop ruining my favorite game you f****** ********.

   5 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

7. Cheers to Rezzahan

   Rezzahan is the only useful person around here. You created a website so devoid of common features that I don't know if they're an employee, and don't have a good way to ask. There's not even a feature to tell you if a question you asked was answered, so who knows if that helpful advice is ever read.

   To the creators and maintainers of this website, hang your head in shame. The Pokémon Team is running circles around you, and need to start writing down and implementing what you can learn from them.

   2 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   2 comments  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

8. MTG Arena Shuffles

   Hello,

   I have been playing MTG Arena for quite some time. Recently I have noticed that your product is very lacking in consistency when it comes to the "online shuffler". I just played aprox. 15 games in which i never saw lands, mana dorks, or only drew lands. This was not previously an issue so something has had to have changed. In fact of those 15 games i had to mulligan to 0 cards in hand multiple times because i was unable to receive a playable hand. You may be thinking " well you're not running enough lands and mana dorks" in fact i'm running the same, if not more than I do in the paper format with less issues in paper. I find it utterly ridiculous that the inconsistent capabilities of you're AI or computer generated shuffler can not produce a more reasonable amount of playable hands. If i'm running a mono green elf tribal ramp deck and can't play half of my cards because i draw 8 lands in a row or have 1 land the whole game there is a problem. I am an avid fan of WOTC and have been playing magic for 16+ years and find it very disappointing that this ease of access is as unfunctional as it is. I also can not think of any reason why the consistency in the failure for the game to perform a playable level due to this utter lack of competency to be VERY disappointing, almost to the point that I would like to remove myself from the product. I don't think it is too much to ask for a computer generated system to be tinkered with to ATLEAST make the utter lack of performance in the product a 50/50 chance of failing. I also find the fact that due to this issue I can lose 13/15 games due to the lack of functionality in the product and still continue to play decks well beyond the capacity of what my deck can do. A matching making rating system should be based off performance and not the "cost/rarity" of the deck I am playing. It seems that the care for the product user has gone downhill. The game used to be fun and has now become a source of irritation due to the lack of consideration and product capability that your company has produced. I am sure no one will actually take the time to read this and research the issues that I have provided which is an issue in itself and is very disheartening that the conglomerate of WOTC has become more money based than about their players. Please note the "super successful" launch of your Zeta set and how well that, amongst other SLD products have been. I started playing in a standard format at my LGS at the of the original lorywn set where quality over quantity was the motto, now it seems to be more based around a paycheck.

   Thanks for your time.

   Hello,

   I have been playing MTG Arena for quite some time. Recently I have noticed that your product is very lacking in consistency when it comes to the "online shuffler". I just played aprox. 15 games in which i never saw lands, mana dorks, or only drew lands. This was not previously an issue so something has had to have changed. In fact of those 15 games i had to mulligan to 0 cards in hand multiple times because i was unable to receive a playable hand. You may be thinking " well you're not running enough lands and mana… more

   3 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

9. How about quit being cowards and allow actual criticism of your terrible products?

   You guys decided to delete my post calling out your Marvel Universe drop, which is an act of corporate cowardice that I find laughable.

   I guess my comment about telling you to print the Peppa Pig cards really struck a nerve with you since you've decided to completely infantilize the game for the next generation by using super heroes instead of coming up with original concepts and ideas.

   I'm glad to know that you're that upset over people levying legitimate criticism of the total and absolute whitewashing of what used to be a great game. It is total absolute proof of my point that you guys are incapable of breaking away from the toxic model of extraction and exploitation that is now rampant throughout this industry and others.

   Instead of creating balanced cards or hiring people who actually stress test the mechanics to the max, you just continue to pump out garbage and force the community to deal with your bad mistakes.

   I still hope you go bankrupt by the way, seeing as how you don't have the spines to allow actual speech on your platforms, and because you have become ethically bankrupt by stooping to the lowest common denominator.

   Delete this post, and I will never purchase a single product from you ever again.

   Money is the only thing you seem to care about anyway.

   You guys decided to delete my post calling out your Marvel Universe drop, which is an act of corporate cowardice that I find laughable.

   I guess my comment about telling you to print the Peppa Pig cards really struck a nerve with you since you've decided to completely infantilize the game for the next generation by using super heroes instead of coming up with original concepts and ideas.

   I'm glad to know that you're that upset over people levying legitimate criticism of the total and absolute whitewashing of what used to be a great game. It is total absolute proof… more

   3 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

10. Wildcards

    Please make it so people can exchange their lower tier wildcards for higher tier ones. A system that is like:
    10 Commons -> 1 uncommon
    10 uncommon -> 1 rare
    10 rare -> 1 mythic

    For years I've had over a hundred common wildcards that I don't even touch or use because it's so easy to open the commons in packs. Please make this change, so many people have been asking for it and it's been neglected for way too long.

    3 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

11. Whenever I claim coins won, it does not add them to my total. Over 3,000 tokens already lost due to this issue.

    Whenever I claim coins won, it does not add them to my total. Over 3,000 tokens already lost due to this issue.

    3 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

12. Add a post-tutorial roadmap: new players get zero guidance into formats, dailies, and events

    The game helps with the initial tutorial and then drops you off with zero guidance: nothing on how to try Brawl or other formats, how daily quests work, or which events you can enter. New players end up stuck, and the path of least resistance becomes buying in-game currency instead of learning the free-to-play loop.

    Suggestion: replace the hard stop after the tutorial with a small, dismissible roadmap checklist: "Try a Format," "Build Your First Deck," "Earn Your First Dailies," "Enter Your First Event." Each step should deep-link directly to the relevant screen (deck builder, Play menu, quest log) rather than describe it in text. Also add short, skippable first-time explainers when a player first opens Brawl, the Play menu, and the store, covering what Gold vs. Gems are for and how daily quests earn them, so free-to-play progression is visible before the store is.

    The biggest churn window in any card game is between finishing the tutorial and finding a mode you want to keep playing. This closes that gap using systems that already exist, with no economy changes required.

    Platform: applies to all platforms (PC, Steam, Mac, Android, iOS).

    The game helps with the initial tutorial and then drops you off with zero guidance: nothing on how to try Brawl or other formats, how daily quests work, or which events you can enter. New players end up stuck, and the path of least resistance becomes buying in-game currency instead of learning the free-to-play loop.

    Suggestion: replace the hard stop after the tutorial with a small, dismissible roadmap checklist: "Try a Format," "Build Your First Deck," "Earn Your First Dailies," "Enter Your First Event." Each step should deep-link directly to the relevant screen (deck builder, Play menu, quest log) rather… more

    3 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

13. Please align Mythic Limited qualification rewards with Limited events

    Please align Mythic Limited qualification rewards with Limited events

    The current Arena qualification system allows players finishing Top 250 on either the Constructed or Limited Mythic ladder to earn entry into the same following Qualifier Weekend, regardless of its format.

    This creates a strange disconnect between the competition used to earn qualification and the competition players qualify for.

    For example, a player can spend an entire ranked season competing in Limited, finish among the Top 250 Limited players on Arena, and then receive qualification for a Standard event. Conversely, a Constructed player can qualify through Constructed and be sent into a Sealed event.

    Limited and Constructed have separate ranked ladders because they test substantially different skills. The qualification system should recognize that distinction.

    I would suggest one of the following approaches:

    • Limited Top 250 finishes earn qualification toward an upcoming Limited Qualifier Weekend, while Constructed Top 250 finishes earn qualification toward an upcoming Constructed Qualifier Weekend.
    • Allow Top 250 players to bank their Qualifier Token and redeem it for an upcoming Qualifier Weekend of their preferred format.
    • Give qualifying players a choice between immediate entry into the next Qualifier Weekend or an equivalent qualification reward that can be used toward a future event.

    This would make pushing for Top 250 more meaningful for format specialists and would ensure that success on a ranked ladder leads to an opportunity to compete using the skills demonstrated on that ladder.

    I am currently competing for a Top 250 Limited finish, and discovering that the reward for doing so is entry into a Standard qualifier substantially reduced the value of that achievement for me. I would much rather have the opportunity to use a Limited qualification earned through Limited play in a Limited competitive event.

    Please consider separating the Limited and Constructed qualification paths, or making Qualifier Tokens format-flexible.

    Please align Mythic Limited qualification rewards with Limited events

    The current Arena qualification system allows players finishing Top 250 on either the Constructed or Limited Mythic ladder to earn entry into the same following Qualifier Weekend, regardless of its format.

    This creates a strange disconnect between the competition used to earn qualification and the competition players qualify for.

    For example, a player can spend an entire ranked season competing in Limited, finish among the Top 250 Limited players on Arena, and then receive qualification for a Standard event. Conversely, a Constructed player can qualify through Constructed and be sent into… more

    2 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

14. planeswalker ability not working

    Options for Davriel, Soul Broker's -2 ability show up, but aren't able to be selected. When they are displayed, the button top right says view browser. When I click it, the abilities hide, and the button then says View battlefield. Something is broken.

    •  

    4 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

15. Dwarf/Chocobos are so LOUD

    Please make the dwarf minion shut up or be quieter. The chocobos, too. They're so constantly loud.

    3 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

16. Improve Arena Rewards & Economy: Bigger Orb Rewards, Wildcard Trading, and Better Arena Direct Prizes

    Hi MTG Arena Team,

    I have three product suggestions that I think would make Arena significantly more enjoyable, especially for players who play a lot and work toward completing sets.

    1) Add larger Orb Emporium rewards

    I’d love to see some larger items in the Orb Emporium that cost significantly more orbs.

    For example, instead of spending my orbs across a bunch of 1-orb and 2-orb purchases, I’d much rather have the option to spend 20 or 30 orbs on one larger or more exciting reward.

    For me, that would be both more fun and more convenient. It would also make earning and spending orbs feel more meaningful. I like the idea of saving them up for something substantial rather than needing to make a lot of small purchases.

    2) Allow Wildcards to be exchanged between rarities

    I would love some way to trade lower-rarity Wildcards for higher-rarity Wildcards.

    For example:

    • 50 Uncommon Wildcards → 1 Rare Wildcard
    • 4 Rare Wildcards → 1 Mythic Rare Wildcard

    The exact exchange rates could obviously be adjusted for balance, but having some type of conversion system would be incredibly useful.

    Right now, I have:

    • 945 Common Wildcards
    • 866 Uncommon Wildcards
    • 0 Rare Wildcards
    • 0 Mythic Rare Wildcards

    I use my Wildcards primarily to complete set collections, so I continually accumulate huge numbers of Common and Uncommon Wildcards that I have very little use for while constantly running out of Rares and Mythics.

    It would feel really good to be able to use those accumulated lower-rarity Wildcards to continue progressing toward set completion, even if the conversion rate were intentionally expensive.

    3) Adjust Arena Direct and other high-level event prize structures

    For larger tournaments such as Arena Direct, I would actually prefer a slightly higher entry fee if it allowed the prize structure to award something for each win.

    Even receiving something small, such as 50 Gems for the first win, feels rewarding. I like how Draft events progressively reward you as you win more games.

    I’d especially love to see the 6-win and 7-win Arena Direct rewards include both the physical box prizes and Gems.

    Winning a box is obviously a valuable and exciting prize, but it feels strange that reaching the highest win levels can actually leave me with fewer Gems available to enter another event.

    As someone who wants to keep playing high-level Magic and winning boxes, my Gems can gradually go down rather than up. It creates a somewhat unusual incentive where stopping around 5 wins can feel like the better outcome if your goal is maximizing Gems.

    Ideally, the highest levels of success would also help fund another Arena Direct entry.

    I completely understand that physical boxes are already a valuable prize, and I’d be open to a higher entry fee if necessary to support a structure like:

    A small Gem reward beginning with the first win

    Increasing Gem rewards as wins accumulate

    Boxes plus Gems at the highest win thresholds

    That would make winning at the highest levels feel even better while encouraging players to keep entering and competing.

    Thanks for considering these suggestions. I really enjoy playing MTG Arena, and improvements like these would put the experience over the top for me.

    Thanks!

    Hi MTG Arena Team,

    I have three product suggestions that I think would make Arena significantly more enjoyable, especially for players who play a lot and work toward completing sets.

    1) Add larger Orb Emporium rewards

    I’d love to see some larger items in the Orb Emporium that cost significantly more orbs.

    For example, instead of spending my orbs across a bunch of 1-orb and 2-orb purchases, I’d much rather have the option to spend 20 or 30 orbs on one larger or more exciting reward.

    For me, that would be both more fun and more convenient. It would also… more

    4 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

17. Toxic needs removed

    Toxic needs removed from non-competitive queues until you make additional ways to interact with poison counters. It's too oppressive and far too easily abused.

    3 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

18. Allow players to concede in the sideboard screen

    Please allow players to concede during the sideboard screen. Sometimes a player needs to leave a game, and not allowing them to concede during sideboarding makes their opponent have to wait until the game times out.

    3 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

19. Align Brawl and EDH banlist.

    I just think that cards banned in EDH (Rofellos, THE PLANESWALKER DOG, Paradox Engine, but also Primeval Titan, Golos, Emrakul, etc.) should be banned in brawl, receiving the same treatment of Strip Mine and Ancient Tomb, for the same reason: they create one-sided games.

    3 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

20. Please Do not remove "rebalancing"

    I'm really sad that Alchemy going away. It's wonderful format!
    If it's difficult to create new Alchemy cards, could you please keep "rebalancing"?
    "Rebalancing" is unique point for DCG. It allows unpopular themes and cards to come into the lime light (like dungeon, Ninjutsu, wizard themes). It's so exciting!
    And it's strong point to keep using bannd cards (like Nadu, Vivi, Cori-Steel Cutter and so on).
    So please reconsider to discontinue Rebalancing.
    thank you.

    3 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating