154 results found

1. Add a post-tutorial roadmap: new players get zero guidance into formats, dailies, and events

   The game helps with the initial tutorial and then drops you off with zero guidance: nothing on how to try Brawl or other formats, how daily quests work, or which events you can enter. New players end up stuck, and the path of least resistance becomes buying in-game currency instead of learning the free-to-play loop.

   Suggestion: replace the hard stop after the tutorial with a small, dismissible roadmap checklist: "Try a Format," "Build Your First Deck," "Earn Your First Dailies," "Enter Your First Event." Each step should deep-link directly to the relevant screen (deck builder, Play menu, quest log) rather than describe it in text. Also add short, skippable first-time explainers when a player first opens Brawl, the Play menu, and the store, covering what Gold vs. Gems are for and how daily quests earn them, so free-to-play progression is visible before the store is.

   The biggest churn window in any card game is between finishing the tutorial and finding a mode you want to keep playing. This closes that gap using systems that already exist, with no economy changes required.

   Platform: applies to all platforms (PC, Steam, Mac, Android, iOS).

   The game helps with the initial tutorial and then drops you off with zero guidance: nothing on how to try Brawl or other formats, how daily quests work, or which events you can enter. New players end up stuck, and the path of least resistance becomes buying in-game currency instead of learning the free-to-play loop.

   Suggestion: replace the hard stop after the tutorial with a small, dismissible roadmap checklist: "Try a Format," "Build Your First Deck," "Earn Your First Dailies," "Enter Your First Event." Each step should deep-link directly to the relevant screen (deck builder, Play menu, quest log) rather… more

   3 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   1 comment  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

2. Harmonize brawl and competitive brawl banlist

   Competitive Brawl should follow the same philosophy as other competitive formats. If a card is banned in Brawl, it should be banned in Competitive Brawl, if a card is considered unfair in one situation it is also unfaire in the other (like Drannith Magistrate or Mana Drain). Having 2 banlists for almost identical formats is just making it harder to build decks, and makes the rules less clear.

   4 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   1 comment  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

3. Bug

   I played barrensteppe siege in a ranked match on Android an my game froze causing me to lose the match. This happened to me twice place fix.
   2026.62.0.6729.1304277

   4 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

4. planeswalker ability not working

   Options for Davriel, Soul Broker's -2 ability show up, but aren't able to be selected. When they are displayed, the button top right says view browser. When I click it, the abilities hide, and the button then says View battlefield. Something is broken.

   •  

   4 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

5. Brawl mode without Perpetual and Conjure

   Can we get a brawl mode that doesn't include cards that are arena only printed? Playing against decks that just abuse perpetual and conjuring mechanics when I never use them it tough. It's purely out of choice just because I prefer paper magic and play arena when I can't, but getting my commander perpetually altered for the rest of the game kind of defeats the purpose of him being my commander, no? And conjuring cards are basically just free tutors and "a deck can have any number of" over and over again in a cheesy manner. I'd just prefer to go against decks that also refrain from using the "arena specific" cards. Like Alchemy vs Standard.

   Can we get a brawl mode that doesn't include cards that are arena only printed? Playing against decks that just abuse perpetual and conjuring mechanics when I never use them it tough. It's purely out of choice just because I prefer paper magic and play arena when I can't, but getting my commander perpetually altered for the rest of the game kind of defeats the purpose of him being my commander, no? And conjuring cards are basically just free tutors and "a deck can have any number of" over and over again in a cheesy manner. I'd just prefer to… more

   5 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   1 comment  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

6. Incorrect rules for character cards causing loss of turn

   Playing marvel jump in
   Player had Whiplash card, John walker, and another card
   They were able to equip whiplash with the token equipment “sturdy shield” and they attacked only with whiplash which they shouldn’t have been able to

   After the attack resolved it appeared to switch to my turn but it immediately went to their turn again without me taking an action in a second
   I also don’t think the health gain worked for whiplash

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   3 comments  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

7. first of please make a format free of alchemy cards and many other ideas.

   1. First of please make a format free of alchemy cards, i dont care if i have to wait 1hr between games, those cards are the most broken, bad design and toxic play patterns.
   2. Ban or restrict strip mine and give us wasteland, there is a reason its ban or restricted in every other format. it leavs no counter play and no agency.
   3. pay a closer eye to current legacy meta when adding card to the pool, for example since Sewer-veillance Cam was printed a new deck with goblin welder has emerged. or add aluren the new hotness in show and tell stategies. i know many people look to legacy for deck ideas and wnat to play the new things from there.
   4. ban Lurrus its to restrictive on optimal dack building.
   5. for my personal sake please give us forth eorlingas, woudl be a string edition to controle.
   6. we need murktide regent. it's been a stable in legacy and morden for years now so many dakc depend on it. also would make people think twice at least before adding Lurrus.
   7. more fast mana for tron like stategies.
   8. Lands toolbox lands, gaea's cradle, karaks, Talon Gates of Madara etc.
   9. hogaak surly deserves a spot in arena?

   hope you read all this , if so many thanks and i hope you take at least some of it in to considerration.

   1. First of please make a format free of alchemy cards, i dont care if i have to wait 1hr between games, those cards are the most broken, bad design and toxic play patterns.
   2. Ban or restrict strip mine and give us wasteland, there is a reason its ban or restricted in every other format. it leavs no counter play and no agency.
   3. pay a closer eye to current legacy meta when adding card to the pool, for example since Sewer-veillance Cam was printed a new deck with goblin welder has emerged. or add aluren the new hotness in show and… more
   5 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   1 comment  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

8. Land Notifier

   I would like there to be an option when you concede a game that it is due to land. Not because you're being a spoiled sport. It's no fun to draw all land or no land for the entire game. And I would like to be able to tell my oponent at the top of the game when you're mulliganing that the reason why/

   in addition, you should update your poll about "Did you have fun this match?" The data you get doesn't help and is skewed. You Should find out why we didn't have fun. I would be that if you had an option to select land pull or other things, you would see a very interesting pool of data that could help you to make better choices in your algorithms.

   I would like there to be an option when you concede a game that it is due to land. Not because you're being a spoiled sport. It's no fun to draw all land or no land for the entire game. And I would like to be able to tell my oponent at the top of the game when you're mulliganing that the reason why/

   in addition, you should update your poll about "Did you have fun this match?" The data you get doesn't help and is skewed. You Should find out why we didn't have fun. I would be that… more

   3 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   1 comment  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

9. I would prefer if we could report a player after the game.

   I'm kind of worried about reporting a player during the game as it can occur during my turn, appearing as though I am stalling as I attempt to find the words to describe why this would be worth a report. Details are key to separating the worthwhile reports from the frivolous ones. Haven't made one yet though.

   The player was being rude by selecting cards as many cards as possible in an obvious attempt to distract me. I want to ask if the client could even detect this behavior. I did stop and use emote because I wanted to communicate that this is obviously rude, and we both know you're not reading 15 cards a second so what you're doing is malicious and not in the spirit of the game. Abusing the client to create a disco lights effect while I'm trying to read your cards and think should be reportable if this particular user is intentionally trying to win games through distraction and annoyance.

   I'm kind of worried about reporting a player during the game as it can occur during my turn, appearing as though I am stalling as I attempt to find the words to describe why this would be worth a report. Details are key to separating the worthwhile reports from the frivolous ones. Haven't made one yet though.

   The player was being rude by selecting cards as many cards as possible in an obvious attempt to distract me. I want to ask if the client could even detect this behavior. I did stop and use emote because I wanted to communicate… more

   3 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

10. Can't view my own feedback/bugs on this site.

    If I go to https://feedback.wizards.com/users/894133237-coke-14715, I can see the bugs/suggestions I've raised over the past few years. (lots about how slow treasure tokens are. Please fix that, I am losing games because of this). But, if I try to visit one of these old posts:

    https://feedback.wizards.com/forums/940206-mtg-arena-archive/suggestions/51327700-cracking-treasures-is-so-slow-it-s-broken

    ... I get a permission denied error.

    "Your email address does not have access to this forum. (Sign out)"

    And there's no support options for the forum itself. I assume this means the older issues have been marked readonly/closed, something - but there's no indication on the list.

    2 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

11. Tutor-heavy Brawl decks appear incorrectly weighted in matchmaking

    Dear MTG Arena Support Team,

    I am writing to submit feedback regarding Brawl matchmaking and deck weighting, specifically concerning decks that run multiple tutor effects.

    In my experience, Brawl decks with access to repeated or highly efficient tutors appear to be under-weighted by the matchmaking system. These decks are often able to consistently find their strongest cards, combo pieces, removal, or win conditions, which makes them significantly more powerful and reliable than decks without similar access to tutors.

    Because Brawl is a singleton format, tutors have an outsized impact on gameplay. They reduce the natural variance of the format and allow certain decks to play much more consistently than their apparent commander or card pool strength would suggest. When these decks are matched against lower-powered or more casual Brawl decks, the games often feel lopsided and unfair.

    I believe the matchmaking system should place greater weight on decks that include multiple tutor effects, especially low-cost or repeatable tutors, and decks where tutors directly enable combos or highly consistent win conditions. These decks should be matched more frequently against other high-powered Brawl decks rather than lower-powered commanders.

    Please review how tutor-heavy Brawl decks are currently weighted in matchmaking and consider adjusting their matchmaking value to better reflect their actual in-game power level.

    Thank you for your time and consideration.

    Dear MTG Arena Support Team,

    I am writing to submit feedback regarding Brawl matchmaking and deck weighting, specifically concerning decks that run multiple tutor effects.

    In my experience, Brawl decks with access to repeated or highly efficient tutors appear to be under-weighted by the matchmaking system. These decks are often able to consistently find their strongest cards, combo pieces, removal, or win conditions, which makes them significantly more powerful and reliable than decks without similar access to tutors.

    Because Brawl is a singleton format, tutors have an outsized impact on gameplay. They reduce the natural variance of the format and… more

    4 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

12. Hei Bai appears incorrectly weighted in Brawl matchmaking

    Dear MTG Arena Support Team,

    I am writing to submit a formal complaint regarding the current matchmaking placement of Hei Bai in Brawl.

    Based on its power level, consistency, and impact on games, Hei Bai appears to be significantly stronger than the commanders it is currently being matched against. In my experience, it is frequently being paired into lower-powered Brawl queues where the matchup feels inappropriate and heavily unbalanced. This creates a frustrating play experience, as the deck’s strength seems much closer to commanders that are typically placed in the so-called “**** Queue.”

    I believe Hei Bai is currently being under-weighted by the matchmaking system and should be reviewed for placement into a higher matchmaking tier. At minimum, its matchmaking weight should be adjusted so that it is more consistently paired against commanders of comparable strength.

    Please review Hei Bai’s current Brawl matchmaking classification and consider whether it should be moved into **** Queue or otherwise weighted more heavily to prevent unfair matchups against lower-powered commanders.

    Thank you for your time and consideration.

    Dear MTG Arena Support Team,

    I am writing to submit a formal complaint regarding the current matchmaking placement of Hei Bai in Brawl.

    Based on its power level, consistency, and impact on games, Hei Bai appears to be significantly stronger than the commanders it is currently being matched against. In my experience, it is frequently being paired into lower-powered Brawl queues where the matchup feels inappropriate and heavily unbalanced. This creates a frustrating play experience, as the deck’s strength seems much closer to commanders that are typically placed in the so-called “**** Queue.”

    I believe Hei Bai is currently being… more

    4 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

13. STARTING HAND

    can you please allow the starting hand to be unsorted and show the cards drawn in the order they were drawn?

    Playing person to person, you can make calculated decisions based on the sequence things are drawn. Arena is designed (whether intentional or not) to take that experience from us. An example of this, if my starting hand has two lands in it and 5 non-land cards - based on the order it was drawn, I can make a smoother decision with all the information. As it stands now, I see all my lands to the left and all my spells to the right, and it doesn't give me all of the information I would have in paper.

    I also understand the knowledge I acquire is marginal data, however, the game is call Magic, and I'd like it to feel more possible by knowing the order I've drawn my starting cards.

    can you please allow the starting hand to be unsorted and show the cards drawn in the order they were drawn?

    Playing person to person, you can make calculated decisions based on the sequence things are drawn. Arena is designed (whether intentional or not) to take that experience from us. An example of this, if my starting hand has two lands in it and 5 non-land cards - based on the order it was drawn, I can make a smoother decision with all the information. As it stands now, I see all my lands to the left and all my… more

    2 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

14. Continue against AI after opponent concedes

    Allow players to continue against AI after a human opponent concedes

    I would like to suggest a feature where, when a human opponent concedes a game, MTG Arena gives the remaining player the option to continue playing against an AI opponent from the exact game state where the opponent conceded.

    For example:

    Opponent concedes → Match win is immediately recorded → “Continue against AI?” → Yes → AI takes control of the opponent’s existing board and hand/game state.

    The original human match would still be completely finished and the win would be recorded normally. The AI continuation would simply be an optional, separate sandbox continuation and would have no effect on Ranked rating, matchmaking, rewards, statistics, or the result of the original game.

    This would be particularly useful when:

    • A player has assembled a complicated combo and wants to actually play it out.
    • An opponent concedes immediately before the player can demonstrate what their deck is capable of.
    • Someone is testing a new deck and wants to see how a particular board state develops.
    • A player wants to practice sequencing or understand how their deck performs from a particular position.
    • A player has spent several minutes setting up a board and would rather not have the game simply end without being able to use it.

    The AI would not necessarily need to be perfect. Even the existing Sparky AI would be useful for this purpose. A stronger AI in the future would make the feature even better.

    Ideally, Arena could offer two choices when an opponent concedes:

    “End Game” — finish normally.

    “Continue Against AI” — preserve the current game state and let the AI take over the opponent’s side.

    This would not undermine competitive integrity because the human match would already have ended and the result would already have been recorded. It would simply give the winning player an optional way to continue playing with the board state they had earned.

    Players have already discussed wanting this functionality in the MTG Arena community, so I believe there is genuine interest in it.

    I think this could be a relatively simple value-add feature that would make Arena considerably more enjoyable, particularly for players who enjoy combo decks, experimentation and deck testing.

    Allow players to continue against AI after a human opponent concedes

    I would like to suggest a feature where, when a human opponent concedes a game, MTG Arena gives the remaining player the option to continue playing against an AI opponent from the exact game state where the opponent conceded.

    For example:

    Opponent concedes → Match win is immediately recorded → “Continue against AI?” → Yes → AI takes control of the opponent’s existing board and hand/game state.

    The original human match would still be completely finished and the win would be recorded normally. The AI continuation would simply be… more

    3 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

15. Improve Arena Rewards & Economy: Bigger Orb Rewards, Wildcard Trading, and Better Arena Direct Prizes

    Hi MTG Arena Team,

    I have three product suggestions that I think would make Arena significantly more enjoyable, especially for players who play a lot and work toward completing sets.

    1) Add larger Orb Emporium rewards

    I’d love to see some larger items in the Orb Emporium that cost significantly more orbs.

    For example, instead of spending my orbs across a bunch of 1-orb and 2-orb purchases, I’d much rather have the option to spend 20 or 30 orbs on one larger or more exciting reward.

    For me, that would be both more fun and more convenient. It would also make earning and spending orbs feel more meaningful. I like the idea of saving them up for something substantial rather than needing to make a lot of small purchases.

    2) Allow Wildcards to be exchanged between rarities

    I would love some way to trade lower-rarity Wildcards for higher-rarity Wildcards.

    For example:

    • 50 Uncommon Wildcards → 1 Rare Wildcard
    • 4 Rare Wildcards → 1 Mythic Rare Wildcard

    The exact exchange rates could obviously be adjusted for balance, but having some type of conversion system would be incredibly useful.

    Right now, I have:

    • 945 Common Wildcards
    • 866 Uncommon Wildcards
    • 0 Rare Wildcards
    • 0 Mythic Rare Wildcards

    I use my Wildcards primarily to complete set collections, so I continually accumulate huge numbers of Common and Uncommon Wildcards that I have very little use for while constantly running out of Rares and Mythics.

    It would feel really good to be able to use those accumulated lower-rarity Wildcards to continue progressing toward set completion, even if the conversion rate were intentionally expensive.

    3) Adjust Arena Direct and other high-level event prize structures

    For larger tournaments such as Arena Direct, I would actually prefer a slightly higher entry fee if it allowed the prize structure to award something for each win.

    Even receiving something small, such as 50 Gems for the first win, feels rewarding. I like how Draft events progressively reward you as you win more games.

    I’d especially love to see the 6-win and 7-win Arena Direct rewards include both the physical box prizes and Gems.

    Winning a box is obviously a valuable and exciting prize, but it feels strange that reaching the highest win levels can actually leave me with fewer Gems available to enter another event.

    As someone who wants to keep playing high-level Magic and winning boxes, my Gems can gradually go down rather than up. It creates a somewhat unusual incentive where stopping around 5 wins can feel like the better outcome if your goal is maximizing Gems.

    Ideally, the highest levels of success would also help fund another Arena Direct entry.

    I completely understand that physical boxes are already a valuable prize, and I’d be open to a higher entry fee if necessary to support a structure like:

    A small Gem reward beginning with the first win

    Increasing Gem rewards as wins accumulate

    Boxes plus Gems at the highest win thresholds

    That would make winning at the highest levels feel even better while encouraging players to keep entering and competing.

    Thanks for considering these suggestions. I really enjoy playing MTG Arena, and improvements like these would put the experience over the top for me.

    Thanks!

    Hi MTG Arena Team,

    I have three product suggestions that I think would make Arena significantly more enjoyable, especially for players who play a lot and work toward completing sets.

    1) Add larger Orb Emporium rewards

    I’d love to see some larger items in the Orb Emporium that cost significantly more orbs.

    For example, instead of spending my orbs across a bunch of 1-orb and 2-orb purchases, I’d much rather have the option to spend 20 or 30 orbs on one larger or more exciting reward.

    For me, that would be both more fun and more convenient. It would also… more

    3 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

16. I'm fed up with Alchemy cards

    One ****** card designed by a grade-schooler ruins the game of Brawl. Despite repeated calls for creating a format where Alchemy can't be used, they show no intention of doing so. Even worse, Wizards deleted an opinion that hundreds of people agreed with.

    5 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

17. Daily Deals are pathetic

    I think it is absolutely pathetic that Wizards made the most excellent choice of selling single cards via daily deals but then offer, almost exclusively, unplayable bulk rares at high cost and then finally when shock lands (which are not only staples of historic and timeless but are currently in standard with no rotation near) pop up in daily deals it is for card styles. Absolutely pathetic. Also I am constantly dropping matches because NO ONE WILL FIX THE SIDEBOARDING BUGS IN BEST OF 3

    2 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

18. Search by most recently acquired

    In deck building and/or collection, please allow search by most recently acquired. Sometimes I forget what I’ve wildcarded when I am on a spree.

    3 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

19. Algorythmic FAVORTISUM is at an ALL TIME HIGH

    For the record ,No rigged ranking system shows who the real Champ is point 1.
    POINT 2 ,I WILL QUIT EVERY GAME THAT LOOKS SUSPECT AND STILL FINISH DIAMOND OR MYTHIC EVERY SEASON.

    NO POINT PLAYING IF THE PC IS HELPING THE OTHER GUY CHEAT.

    3 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

20. Equipment token copies made with 'Ultron, Artifical Malevolence' can not be equipped

    1 - Have Ultron on the battlefield
    2 - Cast Equipment
    3 - Pay the extra 2 to make token copy of Equipment
    4 - Token copy becomes a creature as well
    5 - Select token copy and pay the equip cost to equip to creature
    6 - game allows this, mana is paid, but token copy of equipment never actually equips to creature and remains as a creature on the battlefield.

    •  

    3 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating