153 results found

1. Feedback on the In-Game Player Reporting Feature - Request for Transparency and a System Feedback Channel

   To the MTG Arena Team,

   I am writing as a player to share serious concerns regarding the in-game player reporting feature and the partnership with GGWP announced on August 18, 2026. I would like to request improvements and clarification on the following points.

   1. Overemphasis on Monitoring Player Behavior ("Results") While Overlooking the Environmental Design That Causes Frustration ("Cause")
      The newly added reporting categories (such as roping/stalling and abusive language) only address the symptoms of issues in the competitive environment. The underlying reasons why many players experience stress and resort to unsportsmanlike conduct are deeply connected to platform-side factors: a lack of transparency regarding matchmaking algorithms and probability fairness, long-standing doubts within the community that have never been fully addressed, and communication features that can easily be perceived as taunting.
      Before focusing solely on monitoring and penalizing player behavior with external tools, I believe you should also re-evaluate the game design and competitive environment itself that is causing this frustration.

   2. Lack of a Feedback Channel for Platform-Side Quality Issues and Bugs
      The current reporting feature is limited to monitoring behavior between players. There is no dedicated channel for providing feedback on the platform provider's responsibility, such as "questions about system behavior," "transparency of matchmaking logic," or "long-standing bugs."
      This approach, which appears to set aside accountability for quality control and instead frames all issues as conflicts between players, raises serious concerns.

   3. Risk of Feedback Becoming Siloed and the Need for Transparency
      A design where reports are processed individually and privately within the client risks creating a black box that prevents the community from collectively understanding and discussing issues.
      To resolve distrust and build a truly healthy competitive environment, I believe transparent communication is necessary, including reports on how issues are handled and objective data regarding the fairness of algorithms and probability systems.

   Conclusion
   To protect the integrity of Magic: The Gathering as a historic competitive game, I strongly urge you to go beyond introducing superficial monitoring tools and to make a genuine commitment to fairness and transparency so that players can play with confidence.

   Sincerely,

   To the MTG Arena Team,

   I am writing as a player to share serious concerns regarding the in-game player reporting feature and the partnership with GGWP announced on August 18, 2026. I would like to request improvements and clarification on the following points.

   1. Overemphasis on Monitoring Player Behavior ("Results") While Overlooking the Environmental Design That Causes Frustration ("Cause")
      The newly added reporting categories (such as roping/stalling and abusive language) only address the symptoms of issues in the competitive environment. The underlying reasons why many players experience stress and resort to unsportsmanlike conduct are deeply connected to platform-side factors: a lack… more

   3 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   1 comment  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

2. Add a post-tutorial roadmap: new players get zero guidance into formats, dailies, and events

   The game helps with the initial tutorial and then drops you off with zero guidance: nothing on how to try Brawl or other formats, how daily quests work, or which events you can enter. New players end up stuck, and the path of least resistance becomes buying in-game currency instead of learning the free-to-play loop.

   Suggestion: replace the hard stop after the tutorial with a small, dismissible roadmap checklist: "Try a Format," "Build Your First Deck," "Earn Your First Dailies," "Enter Your First Event." Each step should deep-link directly to the relevant screen (deck builder, Play menu, quest log) rather than describe it in text. Also add short, skippable first-time explainers when a player first opens Brawl, the Play menu, and the store, covering what Gold vs. Gems are for and how daily quests earn them, so free-to-play progression is visible before the store is.

   The biggest churn window in any card game is between finishing the tutorial and finding a mode you want to keep playing. This closes that gap using systems that already exist, with no economy changes required.

   Platform: applies to all platforms (PC, Steam, Mac, Android, iOS).

   The game helps with the initial tutorial and then drops you off with zero guidance: nothing on how to try Brawl or other formats, how daily quests work, or which events you can enter. New players end up stuck, and the path of least resistance becomes buying in-game currency instead of learning the free-to-play loop.

   Suggestion: replace the hard stop after the tutorial with a small, dismissible roadmap checklist: "Try a Format," "Build Your First Deck," "Earn Your First Dailies," "Enter Your First Event." Each step should deep-link directly to the relevant screen (deck builder, Play menu, quest log) rather… more

   3 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   1 comment  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

3. Please align Mythic Limited qualification rewards with Limited events

   Please align Mythic Limited qualification rewards with Limited events

   The current Arena qualification system allows players finishing Top 250 on either the Constructed or Limited Mythic ladder to earn entry into the same following Qualifier Weekend, regardless of its format.

   This creates a strange disconnect between the competition used to earn qualification and the competition players qualify for.

   For example, a player can spend an entire ranked season competing in Limited, finish among the Top 250 Limited players on Arena, and then receive qualification for a Standard event. Conversely, a Constructed player can qualify through Constructed and be sent into a Sealed event.

   Limited and Constructed have separate ranked ladders because they test substantially different skills. The qualification system should recognize that distinction.

   I would suggest one of the following approaches:

   • Limited Top 250 finishes earn qualification toward an upcoming Limited Qualifier Weekend, while Constructed Top 250 finishes earn qualification toward an upcoming Constructed Qualifier Weekend.
   • Allow Top 250 players to bank their Qualifier Token and redeem it for an upcoming Qualifier Weekend of their preferred format.
   • Give qualifying players a choice between immediate entry into the next Qualifier Weekend or an equivalent qualification reward that can be used toward a future event.

   This would make pushing for Top 250 more meaningful for format specialists and would ensure that success on a ranked ladder leads to an opportunity to compete using the skills demonstrated on that ladder.

   I am currently competing for a Top 250 Limited finish, and discovering that the reward for doing so is entry into a Standard qualifier substantially reduced the value of that achievement for me. I would much rather have the opportunity to use a Limited qualification earned through Limited play in a Limited competitive event.

   Please consider separating the Limited and Constructed qualification paths, or making Qualifier Tokens format-flexible.

   Please align Mythic Limited qualification rewards with Limited events

   The current Arena qualification system allows players finishing Top 250 on either the Constructed or Limited Mythic ladder to earn entry into the same following Qualifier Weekend, regardless of its format.

   This creates a strange disconnect between the competition used to earn qualification and the competition players qualify for.

   For example, a player can spend an entire ranked season competing in Limited, finish among the Top 250 Limited players on Arena, and then receive qualification for a Standard event. Conversely, a Constructed player can qualify through Constructed and be sent into… more

   2 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   1 comment  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

4. planeswalker ability not working

   Options for Davriel, Soul Broker's -2 ability show up, but aren't able to be selected. When they are displayed, the button top right says view browser. When I click it, the abilities hide, and the button then says View battlefield. Something is broken.

   •  

   4 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

5. Continue against AI after opponent concedes

   Allow players to continue against AI after a human opponent concedes

   I would like to suggest a feature where, when a human opponent concedes a game, MTG Arena gives the remaining player the option to continue playing against an AI opponent from the exact game state where the opponent conceded.

   For example:

   Opponent concedes → Match win is immediately recorded → “Continue against AI?” → Yes → AI takes control of the opponent’s existing board and hand/game state.

   The original human match would still be completely finished and the win would be recorded normally. The AI continuation would simply be an optional, separate sandbox continuation and would have no effect on Ranked rating, matchmaking, rewards, statistics, or the result of the original game.

   This would be particularly useful when:

   • A player has assembled a complicated combo and wants to actually play it out.
   • An opponent concedes immediately before the player can demonstrate what their deck is capable of.
   • Someone is testing a new deck and wants to see how a particular board state develops.
   • A player wants to practice sequencing or understand how their deck performs from a particular position.
   • A player has spent several minutes setting up a board and would rather not have the game simply end without being able to use it.

   The AI would not necessarily need to be perfect. Even the existing Sparky AI would be useful for this purpose. A stronger AI in the future would make the feature even better.

   Ideally, Arena could offer two choices when an opponent concedes:

   “End Game” — finish normally.

   “Continue Against AI” — preserve the current game state and let the AI take over the opponent’s side.

   This would not undermine competitive integrity because the human match would already have ended and the result would already have been recorded. It would simply give the winning player an optional way to continue playing with the board state they had earned.

   Players have already discussed wanting this functionality in the MTG Arena community, so I believe there is genuine interest in it.

   I think this could be a relatively simple value-add feature that would make Arena considerably more enjoyable, particularly for players who enjoy combo decks, experimentation and deck testing.

   Allow players to continue against AI after a human opponent concedes

   I would like to suggest a feature where, when a human opponent concedes a game, MTG Arena gives the remaining player the option to continue playing against an AI opponent from the exact game state where the opponent conceded.

   For example:

   Opponent concedes → Match win is immediately recorded → “Continue against AI?” → Yes → AI takes control of the opponent’s existing board and hand/game state.

   The original human match would still be completely finished and the win would be recorded normally. The AI continuation would simply be… more

   3 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   1 comment  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

6. Dwarf/Chocobos are so LOUD

   Please make the dwarf minion shut up or be quieter. The chocobos, too. They're so constantly loud.

   3 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

7. Improve Arena Rewards & Economy: Bigger Orb Rewards, Wildcard Trading, and Better Arena Direct Prizes

   Hi MTG Arena Team,

   I have three product suggestions that I think would make Arena significantly more enjoyable, especially for players who play a lot and work toward completing sets.

   1) Add larger Orb Emporium rewards

   I’d love to see some larger items in the Orb Emporium that cost significantly more orbs.

   For example, instead of spending my orbs across a bunch of 1-orb and 2-orb purchases, I’d much rather have the option to spend 20 or 30 orbs on one larger or more exciting reward.

   For me, that would be both more fun and more convenient. It would also make earning and spending orbs feel more meaningful. I like the idea of saving them up for something substantial rather than needing to make a lot of small purchases.

   2) Allow Wildcards to be exchanged between rarities

   I would love some way to trade lower-rarity Wildcards for higher-rarity Wildcards.

   For example:

   • 50 Uncommon Wildcards → 1 Rare Wildcard
   • 4 Rare Wildcards → 1 Mythic Rare Wildcard

   The exact exchange rates could obviously be adjusted for balance, but having some type of conversion system would be incredibly useful.

   Right now, I have:

   • 945 Common Wildcards
   • 866 Uncommon Wildcards
   • 0 Rare Wildcards
   • 0 Mythic Rare Wildcards

   I use my Wildcards primarily to complete set collections, so I continually accumulate huge numbers of Common and Uncommon Wildcards that I have very little use for while constantly running out of Rares and Mythics.

   It would feel really good to be able to use those accumulated lower-rarity Wildcards to continue progressing toward set completion, even if the conversion rate were intentionally expensive.

   3) Adjust Arena Direct and other high-level event prize structures

   For larger tournaments such as Arena Direct, I would actually prefer a slightly higher entry fee if it allowed the prize structure to award something for each win.

   Even receiving something small, such as 50 Gems for the first win, feels rewarding. I like how Draft events progressively reward you as you win more games.

   I’d especially love to see the 6-win and 7-win Arena Direct rewards include both the physical box prizes and Gems.

   Winning a box is obviously a valuable and exciting prize, but it feels strange that reaching the highest win levels can actually leave me with fewer Gems available to enter another event.

   As someone who wants to keep playing high-level Magic and winning boxes, my Gems can gradually go down rather than up. It creates a somewhat unusual incentive where stopping around 5 wins can feel like the better outcome if your goal is maximizing Gems.

   Ideally, the highest levels of success would also help fund another Arena Direct entry.

   I completely understand that physical boxes are already a valuable prize, and I’d be open to a higher entry fee if necessary to support a structure like:

   A small Gem reward beginning with the first win

   Increasing Gem rewards as wins accumulate

   Boxes plus Gems at the highest win thresholds

   That would make winning at the highest levels feel even better while encouraging players to keep entering and competing.

   Thanks for considering these suggestions. I really enjoy playing MTG Arena, and improvements like these would put the experience over the top for me.

   Thanks!

   Hi MTG Arena Team,

   I have three product suggestions that I think would make Arena significantly more enjoyable, especially for players who play a lot and work toward completing sets.

   1) Add larger Orb Emporium rewards

   I’d love to see some larger items in the Orb Emporium that cost significantly more orbs.

   For example, instead of spending my orbs across a bunch of 1-orb and 2-orb purchases, I’d much rather have the option to spend 20 or 30 orbs on one larger or more exciting reward.

   For me, that would be both more fun and more convenient. It would also… more

   4 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

8. Please Do not remove "rebalancing"

   I'm really sad that Alchemy going away. It's wonderful format!
   If it's difficult to create new Alchemy cards, could you please keep "rebalancing"?
   "Rebalancing" is unique point for DCG. It allows unpopular themes and cards to come into the lime light (like dungeon, Ninjutsu, wizard themes). It's so exciting!
   And it's strong point to keep using bannd cards (like Nadu, Vivi, Cori-Steel Cutter and so on).
   So please reconsider to discontinue Rebalancing.
   thank you.

   3 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

9. RNG

   My games never consist of truly random card draws. I have never started with a full hand of lands or a full hand of spells. There has always been at least one land and never more than like 4 or 5. Not only that, Whenever I build a new deck (Brawl), I'm ALWAYS going against another person who has a similar deck as myself. I feel that this game isn't truly random like MTG in person is. I always try to play for fun and never really play ranked because my goal is simply to build decks and have fun with it no matter the outcome. I feel that the lack of randomness truly negates this games' full potential.

   Suggestion: Make the game truly random.

   Reasoning: By making the game truly random, you end up enabling people to think about where a deck they built is truly weak and where they could make inprovements.

   Example: MTG in real life, I have build many decks. One of which I have built over the course of years of fine tuning. It isn't a one turn win deck or anything, but it functions as intended in various scenarios.

   My games never consist of truly random card draws. I have never started with a full hand of lands or a full hand of spells. There has always been at least one land and never more than like 4 or 5. Not only that, Whenever I build a new deck (Brawl), I'm ALWAYS going against another person who has a similar deck as myself. I feel that this game isn't truly random like MTG in person is. I always try to play for fun and never really play ranked because my goal is simply to build decks and have fun… more

   2 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   1 comment  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

10. Incorrect rules for character cards causing loss of turn

    Playing marvel jump in
    Player had Whiplash card, John walker, and another card
    They were able to equip whiplash with the token equipment “sturdy shield” and they attacked only with whiplash which they shouldn’t have been able to

    After the attack resolved it appeared to switch to my turn but it immediately went to their turn again without me taking an action in a second
    I also don’t think the health gain worked for whiplash

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

11. "Asset Error Detected" when playing a tutor

    Whenever I play a tutor and my deck is on display, I immediately get an error message "Asset Error Detected" and it relaunches Arena, but that takes too long and I can't pick my card, I get back into the game a turn later.

    •  

    • 

    • 

    3 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

12. New arena format suggestion

    Hello. I would like to be involved and pitch a new MTG arena idea for the limited community. Let’s take fan favourite sets (duskmourn would be a good example) and try to improve it. I have spent days looking at the card files and feel like I could make an amazing format even better. Just start by removing the made for constructed rares that don’t work in limited and replace them with fan favourite build arounds and rares that strengthen the under powered archetypes. Then take the lowest performing commons and uncommons and replace them with existing cards that may fill out the issues the colour pair or archetypes had. Please contact me, I think this is a great idea and I desperately want the chance to pitch it

    Hello. I would like to be involved and pitch a new MTG arena idea for the limited community. Let’s take fan favourite sets (duskmourn would be a good example) and try to improve it. I have spent days looking at the card files and feel like I could make an amazing format even better. Just start by removing the made for constructed rares that don’t work in limited and replace them with fan favourite build arounds and rares that strengthen the under powered archetypes. Then take the lowest performing commons and uncommons and replace them with existing cards that may… more

    2 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

13. Land Notifier

    I would like there to be an option when you concede a game that it is due to land. Not because you're being a spoiled sport. It's no fun to draw all land or no land for the entire game. And I would like to be able to tell my oponent at the top of the game when you're mulliganing that the reason why/

    in addition, you should update your poll about "Did you have fun this match?" The data you get doesn't help and is skewed. You Should find out why we didn't have fun. I would be that if you had an option to select land pull or other things, you would see a very interesting pool of data that could help you to make better choices in your algorithms.

    I would like there to be an option when you concede a game that it is due to land. Not because you're being a spoiled sport. It's no fun to draw all land or no land for the entire game. And I would like to be able to tell my oponent at the top of the game when you're mulliganing that the reason why/

    in addition, you should update your poll about "Did you have fun this match?" The data you get doesn't help and is skewed. You Should find out why we didn't have fun. I would be that… more

    3 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

14. a brawl free of MTGA cards

    I believe that the inclusion of a Brawl mode that bans all MTG Arena cards should be an option in casual. I understand the cards are in the game, but there should still exist a way for those of us that want to avoid playing with MTGA cards to do so. One shouldn't have to resort to using ones friends list to have fair games of brawl.

    3 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

15. Can't view my own feedback/bugs on this site.

    If I go to https://feedback.wizards.com/users/894133237-coke-14715, I can see the bugs/suggestions I've raised over the past few years. (lots about how slow treasure tokens are. Please fix that, I am losing games because of this). But, if I try to visit one of these old posts:

    https://feedback.wizards.com/forums/940206-mtg-arena-archive/suggestions/51327700-cracking-treasures-is-so-slow-it-s-broken

    ... I get a permission denied error.

    "Your email address does not have access to this forum. (Sign out)"

    And there's no support options for the forum itself. I assume this means the older issues have been marked readonly/closed, something - but there's no indication on the list.

    2 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

16. Rebalanced Versions of Cards in Competitive Brawl

    Hi! I really am enjoying the addition of competitive brawl! It would be awesome to be able to play the original version of cards that have a "nerfed" alchemy version like Winota or Vivi since the format encourages playing high-power cards anyways.

    4 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

17. STARTING HAND

    can you please allow the starting hand to be unsorted and show the cards drawn in the order they were drawn?

    Playing person to person, you can make calculated decisions based on the sequence things are drawn. Arena is designed (whether intentional or not) to take that experience from us. An example of this, if my starting hand has two lands in it and 5 non-land cards - based on the order it was drawn, I can make a smoother decision with all the information. As it stands now, I see all my lands to the left and all my spells to the right, and it doesn't give me all of the information I would have in paper.

    I also understand the knowledge I acquire is marginal data, however, the game is call Magic, and I'd like it to feel more possible by knowing the order I've drawn my starting cards.

    can you please allow the starting hand to be unsorted and show the cards drawn in the order they were drawn?

    Playing person to person, you can make calculated decisions based on the sequence things are drawn. Arena is designed (whether intentional or not) to take that experience from us. An example of this, if my starting hand has two lands in it and 5 non-land cards - based on the order it was drawn, I can make a smoother decision with all the information. As it stands now, I see all my lands to the left and all my… more

    2 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

18. Powered Cube Entry Cost Reduction

    The cost to enter this cube is too high. It is a phantom draft, meaning we don't get to keep any cards we draft, yet the entry fee is the same price as actual drafts. I would expect the prizing to dip if the entry fee is adjusted, but that's completely fine.

    I really like this cube, but I stopped playing it because it is just such horrible value for my gold/gems. Even when you win you're getting less compared to another draft, because this is phantom.

    The format is polarizing and sometimes you roll the event, sometimes you get rolled. It would feel better if there were less stakes, since this is such a casual game mode. It really feels upsetting to have to pay such a high entry fee for a lottery style game mode, and makes players not want to repeat it again.

    I've discussed this with other players and they agree. Just feels like greed (of fake currency) to make it this expensive.

    The cost to enter this cube is too high. It is a phantom draft, meaning we don't get to keep any cards we draft, yet the entry fee is the same price as actual drafts. I would expect the prizing to dip if the entry fee is adjusted, but that's completely fine.

    I really like this cube, but I stopped playing it because it is just such horrible value for my gold/gems. Even when you win you're getting less compared to another draft, because this is phantom.

    The format is polarizing and sometimes you roll the event, sometimes you get… more

    3 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

19. Bug with Adamant mechanic

    As I was playing a game of Mixed-Up Draft, I am resolving the sorcery Forbidden Fruit while having only three lands in play, 2 Swamps and Sanguine Morass, the back side of Bloodsoaked Insight played as a black/red dual. Forbidden Fruit resolves regularly but I don't get a Food token. While paying for Adamant, Arena incorrectly taps Morass for red for no reason whatsoever. This is counter-intuitive and there's no way the player has to be punished for not manually tapping their lands, especially since Adamant cards should be coded in a way that they always get payed for Adamant if there's the correct mana to do so.

    As I was playing a game of Mixed-Up Draft, I am resolving the sorcery Forbidden Fruit while having only three lands in play, 2 Swamps and Sanguine Morass, the back side of Bloodsoaked Insight played as a black/red dual. Forbidden Fruit resolves regularly but I don't get a Food token. While paying for Adamant, Arena incorrectly taps Morass for red for no reason whatsoever. This is counter-intuitive and there's no way the player has to be punished for not manually tapping their lands, especially since Adamant cards should be coded in a way that they always get payed for Adamant… more

    2 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

20. Remove Foundations from MidWeek New Set Constructed Formats

    Remove Foundations from MidWeek New Set Constructed Formats. The MidWeek event is now almost entirely Foundations only decks. It kills the entire spirit of Set Constructed.

    The sets can function on their own. With Friends, I've created where we can play either Foundations LANDS ONLY or any Standard Land. Otherwise, all cards must be from the new Set Constructed.

    2 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating