223 results found

1. Crafted decks invalid - Star Trek
   2 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

2. Product suggestion

   Be careful on this board. Once you post something you will never win a game again. They will permanently place you against opponents that can beat you. I will never spend money on this game. Ever. Never.

   2 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

3. Austere Command Bug

   When selecting Creatures MV 3 or less + Artifacts with Austere Command, my Serrah Farron which was transformed into an enchantment also was destroyed. It should have avoided the board wipe.

   • 

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   1 comment  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

4. Add a post-tutorial roadmap: new players get zero guidance into formats, dailies, and events

   The game helps with the initial tutorial and then drops you off with zero guidance: nothing on how to try Brawl or other formats, how daily quests work, or which events you can enter. New players end up stuck, and the path of least resistance becomes buying in-game currency instead of learning the free-to-play loop.

   Suggestion: replace the hard stop after the tutorial with a small, dismissible roadmap checklist: "Try a Format," "Build Your First Deck," "Earn Your First Dailies," "Enter Your First Event." Each step should deep-link directly to the relevant screen (deck builder, Play menu, quest log) rather than describe it in text. Also add short, skippable first-time explainers when a player first opens Brawl, the Play menu, and the store, covering what Gold vs. Gems are for and how daily quests earn them, so free-to-play progression is visible before the store is.

   The biggest churn window in any card game is between finishing the tutorial and finding a mode you want to keep playing. This closes that gap using systems that already exist, with no economy changes required.

   Platform: applies to all platforms (PC, Steam, Mac, Android, iOS).

   The game helps with the initial tutorial and then drops you off with zero guidance: nothing on how to try Brawl or other formats, how daily quests work, or which events you can enter. New players end up stuck, and the path of least resistance becomes buying in-game currency instead of learning the free-to-play loop.

   Suggestion: replace the hard stop after the tutorial with a small, dismissible roadmap checklist: "Try a Format," "Build Your First Deck," "Earn Your First Dailies," "Enter Your First Event." Each step should deep-link directly to the relevant screen (deck builder, Play menu, quest log) rather… more

   3 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   1 comment  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

5. Amalia 'Explore' Trigger not resolving when she is bounced to hand - Competitive Brawl

   I've had this happen at least twice now in Competitive Brawl. Amalia is my commander. It happens when Amalia enters the battlefield, I have a life gain trigger (Soul Warden or similar), Amalia triggers off life gain and in response to Amalia's trigger (explore whenever you gain life) she becomes targeted by my opponent's bounce spell (unsummon or similar) at which point her Ward cost goes on the stack. Opponent pays the ward cost, I choose to return Amalia to my hand (instead of the command zone), and then the stack just empties / clears without resolving the explore whatsoever. The explore effect fizzles and that's that?

   I've had this happen at least twice now in Competitive Brawl. Amalia is my commander. It happens when Amalia enters the battlefield, I have a life gain trigger (Soul Warden or similar), Amalia triggers off life gain and in response to Amalia's trigger (explore whenever you gain life) she becomes targeted by my opponent's bounce spell (unsummon or similar) at which point her Ward cost goes on the stack. Opponent pays the ward cost, I choose to return Amalia to my hand (instead of the command zone), and then the stack just empties / clears without resolving the explore whatsoever.… more

   • 

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   1 comment  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

6. Please align Mythic Limited qualification rewards with Limited events

   Please align Mythic Limited qualification rewards with Limited events

   The current Arena qualification system allows players finishing Top 250 on either the Constructed or Limited Mythic ladder to earn entry into the same following Qualifier Weekend, regardless of its format.

   This creates a strange disconnect between the competition used to earn qualification and the competition players qualify for.

   For example, a player can spend an entire ranked season competing in Limited, finish among the Top 250 Limited players on Arena, and then receive qualification for a Standard event. Conversely, a Constructed player can qualify through Constructed and be sent into a Sealed event.

   Limited and Constructed have separate ranked ladders because they test substantially different skills. The qualification system should recognize that distinction.

   I would suggest one of the following approaches:

   • Limited Top 250 finishes earn qualification toward an upcoming Limited Qualifier Weekend, while Constructed Top 250 finishes earn qualification toward an upcoming Constructed Qualifier Weekend.
   • Allow Top 250 players to bank their Qualifier Token and redeem it for an upcoming Qualifier Weekend of their preferred format.
   • Give qualifying players a choice between immediate entry into the next Qualifier Weekend or an equivalent qualification reward that can be used toward a future event.

   This would make pushing for Top 250 more meaningful for format specialists and would ensure that success on a ranked ladder leads to an opportunity to compete using the skills demonstrated on that ladder.

   I am currently competing for a Top 250 Limited finish, and discovering that the reward for doing so is entry into a Standard qualifier substantially reduced the value of that achievement for me. I would much rather have the opportunity to use a Limited qualification earned through Limited play in a Limited competitive event.

   Please consider separating the Limited and Constructed qualification paths, or making Qualifier Tokens format-flexible.

   Please align Mythic Limited qualification rewards with Limited events

   The current Arena qualification system allows players finishing Top 250 on either the Constructed or Limited Mythic ladder to earn entry into the same following Qualifier Weekend, regardless of its format.

   This creates a strange disconnect between the competition used to earn qualification and the competition players qualify for.

   For example, a player can spend an entire ranked season competing in Limited, finish among the Top 250 Limited players on Arena, and then receive qualification for a Standard event. Conversely, a Constructed player can qualify through Constructed and be sent into… more

   2 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   1 comment  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

7. New Anthologies

   I would love to see new anthologies. I remember being super excited any time one came out in the past. I like seeing older and newer cards on Arena. For example, a new brawl anthology could feature the rest of the partner commanders we don’t have.

   2 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

8. Direct Challenge Deck Lending

   Add an option to 'share' your decks with 'Direct Challenge' opponents allowing them to use the decks you have constructed, for the challenge only.
   This would allow players new to Arena to be able to experience a greater variety of decks against their friends, without affecting the Wildcard/open play economy. This may also have positive effects for certain community tournaments hosted on Arena.
   This mechanism exists in similar games, like Hearthstone, already.

   2 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

9. Fistbump

   Add a fistbump emote option where a user can offer a fistbump and the opponent can accept. It’s a completely reciprocal emote that allows users to connect via the (rightly) limited emote system.

   A “Nice!” and “Thanks!” works well but a fistbump is yet even more neutral. “Nice!” is an enthusiastic endorsement of being pwnd. “Good game” is potentially sarcastic. But a fistbump from the disadvantaged player is a casual and neutral recognition of a good move. As well, it is a neutral and dignified recognition of being outplayed at the end of game.

   It always feels good to have a shared mutual understanding at the end, and this would just be another option to keep the game fun and positive.

   Add a fistbump emote option where a user can offer a fistbump and the opponent can accept. It’s a completely reciprocal emote that allows users to connect via the (rightly) limited emote system.

   A “Nice!” and “Thanks!” works well but a fistbump is yet even more neutral. “Nice!” is an enthusiastic endorsement of being pwnd. “Good game” is potentially sarcastic. But a fistbump from the disadvantaged player is a casual and neutral recognition of a good move. As well, it is a neutral and dignified recognition of being outplayed at the end of game.

   It always feels good to have… more

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   1 comment  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

10. planeswalker ability not working

    Options for Davriel, Soul Broker's -2 ability show up, but aren't able to be selected. When they are displayed, the button top right says view browser. When I click it, the abilities hide, and the button then says View battlefield. Something is broken.

    •  

    4 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

11. Cannot Download on Mobile Device

    For some time now I have had to switch to the Ubuntu OS, and MTGA is not supported for this OS. I even bought cards in the game when I had a Windows PC, but now I cannot play, and this is an issue since I have spent money.

    2 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

12. quit scamming players

    Quit scamming players. Has anyone at Wizards tried this idea yet?

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

13. Product Suggestion

    I gotta be honest, I think it is a little ridiculous that the game is designed to pit the same type of deck against each other when trying to match. Do they do that in actual game play? I don't remember seeing that at any event that I have gone too so I think you guys need to re-work your matching engine.

    Also I thing some of the ranked win/loss advancement should be re worked. If I lose one bar and go back down a lvl and then win a game and go to the next lvl again I feel like I should still get the 2 bars I get for a win. If you are going to take them away and then actively try to match me against someone who can beat me, I shouldn't drop rank or I should keep my bars when I move upward.

    I gotta be honest, I think it is a little ridiculous that the game is designed to pit the same type of deck against each other when trying to match. Do they do that in actual game play? I don't remember seeing that at any event that I have gone too so I think you guys need to re-work your matching engine.

    Also I thing some of the ranked win/loss advancement should be re worked. If I lose one bar and go back down a lvl and then win a game and go to the next lvl again I feel… more

    2 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

14. Dwarf/Chocobos are so LOUD

    Please make the dwarf minion shut up or be quieter. The chocobos, too. They're so constantly loud.

    3 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

15. Toxic needs removed

    Toxic needs removed from non-competitive queues until you make additional ways to interact with poison counters. It's too oppressive and far too easily abused.

    3 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

16. Are you sure on concede

    I had someone roping me and went to do a player report and accidentally hit concede. Pretty horrible experience to have someone just wasting your time then they get a free win on top to reward their bad behaviour. The report player button being elsewhere would also do the same job if that’s easier.

    2 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

17. Proposal: Healthier Magic Gameplay Through Better Early-Game Card Design

    I would like to propose a change in how Wizards approaches future Magic: The Gathering card design, particularly when it comes to early-game acceleration, explosive openings and non-interactive wins.

    The goal should be to create more meaningful games, where both players have an opportunity to develop their strategies, interact and make decisions, rather than having games effectively decided by turns 1–4.

    I believe Magic should encourage gameplay that naturally develops over approximately 7–10 turns more frequently, without eliminating aggro, combo or other competitive archetypes.

    This isn't a request to make every game longer or weaken every powerful card. It's a proposal to introduce better tools that regulate early-game explosiveness without unnecessarily strengthening control strategies.

    1. Address explosive early-game strategies proactively

    Instead of relying exclusively on bans after problematic cards and combinations become dominant, Wizards could introduce carefully designed cards that regulate early-game mechanics.

    Some areas worth addressing:

    • Excessive fast mana and mana acceleration.
    • Free spells that enable explosive opening sequences.
    • Strategies that generate overwhelming advantages before turn four.
    • Combinations that bypass normal resource progression.
    • Early-game strategies that offer very limited opportunities for meaningful counterplay.

    The objective isn't to eliminate these mechanics, but to introduce reasonable limitations and trade-offs.

    2. Introduce low-cost cards specifically designed to regulate early gameplay

    I believe there is an opportunity to design new cards with zero or one mana costs, as well as Leyline-style enchantments that can influence the game from the opening hand.

    These cards should be symmetrical, temporary and designed to slow explosive gameplay without providing additional advantages to control decks.

    Here are some examples of possible designs:

    Example A: Leyline of Progression

    Cost: {GW2}

    Enchantment

    If this card is in your opening hand, you may begin the game with it on the battlefield.

    Players can't cast spells and creatures can't enter the battlefield if their converted mana cost is greater then the number of lands they control.

    Purpose:
    - Limits excessive early cheats.
    - Preserves normal pace of game.
    - Applies equally to both players.
    - Doesn't provide card advantage, removal or counterspells.

    Example B: Orb of Tourach

    Cost: {2}

    Artifact

    If this card is in your opening hand, you may reveal it and begin the game with it on the battlefield. If you do, you can't cast non-creature spells for the first 2 turns.

    When your opponents look, reveal, search, seek, scry or surveil at cards in their libraries, it applies only to the top card of their library.

    Purpose:
    - Discourages explosive free-spell sequences.
    - Addresses early-game combos that require specific cards.
    - Doesn't prevent players from developing their board normally.

    Example C: Legendary - Ancient Decree

    Cost: {0}

    Artifact

    When Ancient Decree comes into play, you can't cast any other spell this turn.

    During each player's turn, spells cast by other players cost 1 more to cast.

    Purpose:
    - Encourages fair and fun gameplay.

    These are illustrative concepts, not necessarily final card designs. They would require extensive playtesting to ensure they don't disproportionately penalize particular archetypes.

    3. Avoid solving the problem by strengthening control

    An important consideration is that slowing Magic shouldn't simply translate into giving control decks more power.

    I would specifically avoid relying on:

    • More efficient counterspells.
    • Additional free removal.
    • More card advantage.
    • Permanent restrictions that create oppressive lock strategies.
    • Excessive taxes on creature-based strategies.

    The objective is to improve the overall pace of gameplay, not to shift the balance of power toward control.

    Aggro, midrange, combo and control should all remain competitive.

    4. Make threats and answers more balanced

    Another important aspect of healthier gameplay is ensuring that answers remain competitive with the threats being introduced.

    Future card designs should consider:

    • Whether powerful threats are too efficient relative to their answers.
    • Whether players have reasonable opportunities to respond.
    • Whether a strategy becomes overwhelming before opponents can meaningfully participate.
    • Whether free spells and alternative casting costs create disproportionate advantages.
    • Whether powerful combinations require meaningful investment and setup.

    A healthy format should reward strategic decisions rather than simply rewarding whichever player executes the fastest opening.

    5. Evaluate gameplay quality, not just win rates

    I would encourage Wizards to evaluate new card designs using additional gameplay metrics:

    • Frequency of games effectively decided by turns 1–2.
    • Frequency of games effectively decided by turns 3–4.
    • Percentage of games reaching turns 7–10.
    • Frequency of non-interactive games.
    • Number of meaningful decisions available to both players.
    • Impact of new cards on aggro, midrange, combo and control archetypes.

    Win rates alone don't necessarily tell us whether a game is enjoyable or whether both players had a reasonable opportunity to participate.

    6. Establish a long-term design philosophy

    I would like Wizards to consider making the following principles a more explicit part of future card development:

    • Encourage meaningful game progression.
    • Reduce excessively explosive early-game sequences.
    • Preserve strategic diversity across archetypes.
    • Maintain a healthy balance between threats and answers.
    • Avoid making control stronger simply to slow down other strategies.
    • Reward planning, sequencing, resource management and interaction.

    The objective should be to make games more meaningful, not simply longer.

    Final thoughts

    Magic is at its best when both players have opportunities to develop their strategies, adapt to their opponent and make meaningful decisions.

    I would much rather play a competitive, interactive seven-turn game than win or lose a non-interactive game on turn three.

    Magic has enormous strategic depth, and future card design should protect that depth rather than continually pushing the limits of speed and efficiency.

    I believe Wizards can accomplish this through proactive card design rather than relying primarily on bans and emergency format adjustments.

    Let's make Magic more interactive, more strategic and more enjoyable for everyone, without sacrificing the diversity that makes the game great.

    Thank you for considering this proposal.

    I would like to propose a change in how Wizards approaches future Magic: The Gathering card design, particularly when it comes to early-game acceleration, explosive openings and non-interactive wins.

    The goal should be to create more meaningful games, where both players have an opportunity to develop their strategies, interact and make decisions, rather than having games effectively decided by turns 1–4.

    I believe Magic should encourage gameplay that naturally develops over approximately 7–10 turns more frequently, without eliminating aggro, combo or other competitive archetypes.

    This isn't a request to make every game longer or weaken every powerful card. It's a… more

    2 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

18. ****** game does not represent anything close to real mtg. Total waste of time and money don't play this pos. You'll wish you hadn't.

    Even when the game isn't broken, or doing things it shouldn't. You're getting screwed on the way the game gives you cards. I've played since Ice Age, and I've never been so mana screwed/flooded in my life. Any time I add a copy of anything, I'll immediately get all four copies, for the next game or two. Game after game after game, all four copies of the one spell you don't need for the matchup. It's not mathematically possible, nor does it ever happen in real life like it does here. What an aggravating piece of trash this game is. Don't even get me started on the customer service. I've made so many tickets I can't keep them straight, and the only thing that is consistent is the obvious fact the customer service reps didn't even take the 30 seconds to read the ticket before spewing random bs nobody asked about. This game is ruining the experience for soo many people. Causing them to go elsewhere, like myself. After spending over 500$, I can't even play a game without some mishap or getting so obviously and thoroughly screwed. 3000 games and tournaments I've played here, so I know what I'm talking about. I can't remember one that went acceptably. Read further. I'm not alone, but most don't bother posting.

    I so badly wanted to love this game, but the game is broken.

    Save your money, go buy actual cards. Whatever you do, don't bother playing this pos game.

    Even when the game isn't broken, or doing things it shouldn't. You're getting screwed on the way the game gives you cards. I've played since Ice Age, and I've never been so mana screwed/flooded in my life. Any time I add a copy of anything, I'll immediately get all four copies, for the next game or two. Game after game after game, all four copies of the one spell you don't need for the matchup. It's not mathematically possible, nor does it ever happen in real life like it does here. What an aggravating piece of trash this game is.… more

    2 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

19. Allow players to concede in the sideboard screen

    Please allow players to concede during the sideboard screen. Sometimes a player needs to leave a game, and not allowing them to concede during sideboarding makes their opponent have to wait until the game times out.

    3 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

20. Emry

    Emry, Lurker isn't allowing graveyard fetch of artifact lands
    Android
    Emry's ability allows for selecting the artifact lands (like treasure vault) but then they don't come to the hand to play (I haven't already played a land that turn)

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating