173 results found

1. Land Notifier

   I would like there to be an option when you concede a game that it is due to land. Not because you're being a spoiled sport. It's no fun to draw all land or no land for the entire game. And I would like to be able to tell my oponent at the top of the game when you're mulliganing that the reason why/

   in addition, you should update your poll about "Did you have fun this match?" The data you get doesn't help and is skewed. You Should find out why we didn't have fun. I would be that if you had an option to select land pull or other things, you would see a very interesting pool of data that could help you to make better choices in your algorithms.

   I would like there to be an option when you concede a game that it is due to land. Not because you're being a spoiled sport. It's no fun to draw all land or no land for the entire game. And I would like to be able to tell my oponent at the top of the game when you're mulliganing that the reason why/

   in addition, you should update your poll about "Did you have fun this match?" The data you get doesn't help and is skewed. You Should find out why we didn't have fun. I would be that… more

   3 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   1 comment  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

2. Improve Arena Rewards & Economy: Bigger Orb Rewards, Wildcard Trading, and Better Arena Direct Prizes

   Hi MTG Arena Team,

   I have three product suggestions that I think would make Arena significantly more enjoyable, especially for players who play a lot and work toward completing sets.

   1) Add larger Orb Emporium rewards

   I’d love to see some larger items in the Orb Emporium that cost significantly more orbs.

   For example, instead of spending my orbs across a bunch of 1-orb and 2-orb purchases, I’d much rather have the option to spend 20 or 30 orbs on one larger or more exciting reward.

   For me, that would be both more fun and more convenient. It would also make earning and spending orbs feel more meaningful. I like the idea of saving them up for something substantial rather than needing to make a lot of small purchases.

   2) Allow Wildcards to be exchanged between rarities

   I would love some way to trade lower-rarity Wildcards for higher-rarity Wildcards.

   For example:

   • 50 Uncommon Wildcards → 1 Rare Wildcard
   • 4 Rare Wildcards → 1 Mythic Rare Wildcard

   The exact exchange rates could obviously be adjusted for balance, but having some type of conversion system would be incredibly useful.

   Right now, I have:

   • 945 Common Wildcards
   • 866 Uncommon Wildcards
   • 0 Rare Wildcards
   • 0 Mythic Rare Wildcards

   I use my Wildcards primarily to complete set collections, so I continually accumulate huge numbers of Common and Uncommon Wildcards that I have very little use for while constantly running out of Rares and Mythics.

   It would feel really good to be able to use those accumulated lower-rarity Wildcards to continue progressing toward set completion, even if the conversion rate were intentionally expensive.

   3) Adjust Arena Direct and other high-level event prize structures

   For larger tournaments such as Arena Direct, I would actually prefer a slightly higher entry fee if it allowed the prize structure to award something for each win.

   Even receiving something small, such as 50 Gems for the first win, feels rewarding. I like how Draft events progressively reward you as you win more games.

   I’d especially love to see the 6-win and 7-win Arena Direct rewards include both the physical box prizes and Gems.

   Winning a box is obviously a valuable and exciting prize, but it feels strange that reaching the highest win levels can actually leave me with fewer Gems available to enter another event.

   As someone who wants to keep playing high-level Magic and winning boxes, my Gems can gradually go down rather than up. It creates a somewhat unusual incentive where stopping around 5 wins can feel like the better outcome if your goal is maximizing Gems.

   Ideally, the highest levels of success would also help fund another Arena Direct entry.

   I completely understand that physical boxes are already a valuable prize, and I’d be open to a higher entry fee if necessary to support a structure like:

   A small Gem reward beginning with the first win

   Increasing Gem rewards as wins accumulate

   Boxes plus Gems at the highest win thresholds

   That would make winning at the highest levels feel even better while encouraging players to keep entering and competing.

   Thanks for considering these suggestions. I really enjoy playing MTG Arena, and improvements like these would put the experience over the top for me.

   Thanks!

   Hi MTG Arena Team,

   I have three product suggestions that I think would make Arena significantly more enjoyable, especially for players who play a lot and work toward completing sets.

   1) Add larger Orb Emporium rewards

   I’d love to see some larger items in the Orb Emporium that cost significantly more orbs.

   For example, instead of spending my orbs across a bunch of 1-orb and 2-orb purchases, I’d much rather have the option to spend 20 or 30 orbs on one larger or more exciting reward.

   For me, that would be both more fun and more convenient. It would also… more

   3 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

3. first of please make a format free of alchemy cards and many other ideas.

   1. First of please make a format free of alchemy cards, i dont care if i have to wait 1hr between games, those cards are the most broken, bad design and toxic play patterns.
   2. Ban or restrict strip mine and give us wasteland, there is a reason its ban or restricted in every other format. it leavs no counter play and no agency.
   3. pay a closer eye to current legacy meta when adding card to the pool, for example since Sewer-veillance Cam was printed a new deck with goblin welder has emerged. or add aluren the new hotness in show and tell stategies. i know many people look to legacy for deck ideas and wnat to play the new things from there.
   4. ban Lurrus its to restrictive on optimal dack building.
   5. for my personal sake please give us forth eorlingas, woudl be a string edition to controle.
   6. we need murktide regent. it's been a stable in legacy and morden for years now so many dakc depend on it. also would make people think twice at least before adding Lurrus.
   7. more fast mana for tron like stategies.
   8. Lands toolbox lands, gaea's cradle, karaks, Talon Gates of Madara etc.
   9. hogaak surly deserves a spot in arena?

   hope you read all this , if so many thanks and i hope you take at least some of it in to considerration.

   1. First of please make a format free of alchemy cards, i dont care if i have to wait 1hr between games, those cards are the most broken, bad design and toxic play patterns.
   2. Ban or restrict strip mine and give us wasteland, there is a reason its ban or restricted in every other format. it leavs no counter play and no agency.
   3. pay a closer eye to current legacy meta when adding card to the pool, for example since Sewer-veillance Cam was printed a new deck with goblin welder has emerged. or add aluren the new hotness in show and… more
   4 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   1 comment  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

4. Desireability of Bundles On Arena

   I will not purchase the Captain America bundle because the only upside compared to buying the packs normally is a couple cosmetics.
   I would buy the bundle if it had even a slightly lower cost than buying packs normally. Instead of being 10,000 gold, I would be significantly more inclined to purchase it at 9,000 gold or 9,500 gold.

   4 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

5. Modern Format

   It seems clear that WotC won’t remove Alchemy cards from the Historic format, despite it ruining the experience for players that want to play decks that can exist outside the electronic format. Honestly, I don’t understand the resistance, since the change might encourage players to buy cards in the real world.

   This said, why doesn’t WotC include the Modern format (which would explicitly exclude Alchemy)? I won’t hold my breath…

   7 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

6. Daily Deals are pathetic

   I think it is absolutely pathetic that Wizards made the most excellent choice of selling single cards via daily deals but then offer, almost exclusively, unplayable bulk rares at high cost and then finally when shock lands (which are not only staples of historic and timeless but are currently in standard with no rotation near) pop up in daily deals it is for card styles. Absolutely pathetic. Also I am constantly dropping matches because NO ONE WILL FIX THE SIDEBOARDING BUGS IN BEST OF 3

   2 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   1 comment  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

7. Algorythmic FAVORTISUM is at an ALL TIME HIGH

   For the record ,No rigged ranking system shows who the real Champ is point 1.
   POINT 2 ,I WILL QUIT EVERY GAME THAT LOOKS SUSPECT AND STILL FINISH DIAMOND OR MYTHIC EVERY SEASON.

   NO POINT PLAYING IF THE PC IS HELPING THE OTHER GUY CHEAT.

   3 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

8. Equipment token copies made with 'Ultron, Artifical Malevolence' can not be equipped

   1 - Have Ultron on the battlefield
   2 - Cast Equipment
   3 - Pay the extra 2 to make token copy of Equipment
   4 - Token copy becomes a creature as well
   5 - Select token copy and pay the equip cost to equip to creature
   6 - game allows this, mana is paid, but token copy of equipment never actually equips to creature and remains as a creature on the battlefield.

   •  

   3 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   1 comment  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

9. RAHILDA, WANTED CUTTHROAT

   RAHILDA WANTED CUTTHROAT wouldnt let me play the card is had exiled

   2 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   1 comment  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

10. PLEASE put companion (pet) sound effects on a different channel from normal SFX

    Could "game rules" sounds be on a separate channel from normal sound effects?

    I want to mute everything that isn't relevant to the execution of a match, so that when i minimize the window the only sounds i hear from the game are sounds that tell me something is happening that i might need to respond to.

    Like, just sound effects for game actions, shuffling, the rope, priority, etc. I want to mute everything else, no "ear candy".

    3 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

11. "Are you sure?" Button for commander zone movement

    Can we get an 'are you sure?' check for when commander is moving into exile and you accidentally click decline? Similar to the checks when you forget that you're trying to counter an uncounterable spell?

    3 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

12. More than 100 deck

    You should add more than 100 maximum deck creation, I'm already at 100 and I want to create more without deleting deck, it is so fun to create new deck with different strategies

    Thanks

    2 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

13. Brawl mode without Perpetual and Conjure

    Can we get a brawl mode that doesn't include cards that are arena only printed? Playing against decks that just abuse perpetual and conjuring mechanics when I never use them it tough. It's purely out of choice just because I prefer paper magic and play arena when I can't, but getting my commander perpetually altered for the rest of the game kind of defeats the purpose of him being my commander, no? And conjuring cards are basically just free tutors and "a deck can have any number of" over and over again in a cheesy manner. I'd just prefer to go against decks that also refrain from using the "arena specific" cards. Like Alchemy vs Standard.

    Can we get a brawl mode that doesn't include cards that are arena only printed? Playing against decks that just abuse perpetual and conjuring mechanics when I never use them it tough. It's purely out of choice just because I prefer paper magic and play arena when I can't, but getting my commander perpetually altered for the rest of the game kind of defeats the purpose of him being my commander, no? And conjuring cards are basically just free tutors and "a deck can have any number of" over and over again in a cheesy manner. I'd just prefer to… more

    3 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

14. Harmonize brawl and competitive brawl banlist

    Competitive Brawl should follow the same philosophy as other competitive formats. If a card is banned in Brawl, it should be banned in Competitive Brawl, if a card is considered unfair in one situation it is also unfaire in the other (like Drannith Magistrate or Mana Drain). Having 2 banlists for almost identical formats is just making it harder to build decks, and makes the rules less clear.

    3 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

15. MMR is overriding deck power too heavily in Brawl matchmaking

    I am also submitting feedback that MMR appears to be weighted too heavily compared to actual deck power in Brawl matchmaking.

    The current system seems to punish players for winning games with casual or fun decks. A deck may start out receiving appropriate matchups based on its actual power level, but after winning some games, the matchmaking appears to push that deck into queues against highly optimized lists, tutor-heavy decks, ramp shells, control shells, stax pieces, and combo engines that are far beyond the deck’s intended power level.

    This creates a frustrating experience because a casual deck that is capable of winning some games is not the same thing as an optimized high-power deck. Winning with a lower-powered or more casual deck should not cause the player to be repeatedly matched against decks with much higher consistency, stronger card quality, more tutors, more ramp, or more oppressive game plans.

    Brawl matchmaking should prioritize deck construction and actual deck power more heavily than player MMR. MMR may be useful as one factor, but it should not override deck-strength weighting to the point that a casual deck is effectively punished for performing well.

    Please review whether Brawl matchmaking is placing too much emphasis on MMR relative to deck power. The system should distinguish between a truly optimized deck and a casual deck that happens to win games through normal gameplay.

    I am also submitting feedback that MMR appears to be weighted too heavily compared to actual deck power in Brawl matchmaking.

    The current system seems to punish players for winning games with casual or fun decks. A deck may start out receiving appropriate matchups based on its actual power level, but after winning some games, the matchmaking appears to push that deck into queues against highly optimized lists, tutor-heavy decks, ramp shells, control shells, stax pieces, and combo engines that are far beyond the deck’s intended power level.

    This creates a frustrating experience because a casual deck that is capable… more

    3 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

16. Tutor-heavy Brawl decks appear incorrectly weighted in matchmaking

    Dear MTG Arena Support Team,

    I am writing to submit feedback regarding Brawl matchmaking and deck weighting, specifically concerning decks that run multiple tutor effects.

    In my experience, Brawl decks with access to repeated or highly efficient tutors appear to be under-weighted by the matchmaking system. These decks are often able to consistently find their strongest cards, combo pieces, removal, or win conditions, which makes them significantly more powerful and reliable than decks without similar access to tutors.

    Because Brawl is a singleton format, tutors have an outsized impact on gameplay. They reduce the natural variance of the format and allow certain decks to play much more consistently than their apparent commander or card pool strength would suggest. When these decks are matched against lower-powered or more casual Brawl decks, the games often feel lopsided and unfair.

    I believe the matchmaking system should place greater weight on decks that include multiple tutor effects, especially low-cost or repeatable tutors, and decks where tutors directly enable combos or highly consistent win conditions. These decks should be matched more frequently against other high-powered Brawl decks rather than lower-powered commanders.

    Please review how tutor-heavy Brawl decks are currently weighted in matchmaking and consider adjusting their matchmaking value to better reflect their actual in-game power level.

    Thank you for your time and consideration.

    Dear MTG Arena Support Team,

    I am writing to submit feedback regarding Brawl matchmaking and deck weighting, specifically concerning decks that run multiple tutor effects.

    In my experience, Brawl decks with access to repeated or highly efficient tutors appear to be under-weighted by the matchmaking system. These decks are often able to consistently find their strongest cards, combo pieces, removal, or win conditions, which makes them significantly more powerful and reliable than decks without similar access to tutors.

    Because Brawl is a singleton format, tutors have an outsized impact on gameplay. They reduce the natural variance of the format and… more

    3 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

17. Hei Bai appears incorrectly weighted in Brawl matchmaking

    Dear MTG Arena Support Team,

    I am writing to submit a formal complaint regarding the current matchmaking placement of Hei Bai in Brawl.

    Based on its power level, consistency, and impact on games, Hei Bai appears to be significantly stronger than the commanders it is currently being matched against. In my experience, it is frequently being paired into lower-powered Brawl queues where the matchup feels inappropriate and heavily unbalanced. This creates a frustrating play experience, as the deck’s strength seems much closer to commanders that are typically placed in the so-called “**** Queue.”

    I believe Hei Bai is currently being under-weighted by the matchmaking system and should be reviewed for placement into a higher matchmaking tier. At minimum, its matchmaking weight should be adjusted so that it is more consistently paired against commanders of comparable strength.

    Please review Hei Bai’s current Brawl matchmaking classification and consider whether it should be moved into **** Queue or otherwise weighted more heavily to prevent unfair matchups against lower-powered commanders.

    Thank you for your time and consideration.

    Dear MTG Arena Support Team,

    I am writing to submit a formal complaint regarding the current matchmaking placement of Hei Bai in Brawl.

    Based on its power level, consistency, and impact on games, Hei Bai appears to be significantly stronger than the commanders it is currently being matched against. In my experience, it is frequently being paired into lower-powered Brawl queues where the matchup feels inappropriate and heavily unbalanced. This creates a frustrating play experience, as the deck’s strength seems much closer to commanders that are typically placed in the so-called “**** Queue.”

    I believe Hei Bai is currently being… more

    3 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

18. I'm fed up with Alchemy cards

    One ****** card designed by a grade-schooler ruins the game of Brawl. Despite repeated calls for creating a format where Alchemy can't be used, they show no intention of doing so. Even worse, Wizards deleted an opinion that hundreds of people agreed with.

    4 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

19. Stop using planeswalkers as commanders in brawl

    please, if you are going to enable ranked brawl, just don't allow planeswalkers as commanders.

    In a 1v1 format having access to so many habilites as soon as it comes down it's unfair. there's removal for planeswalkers but it's not that common.
    it's not like creatures with summoning sickness, if they caught you with no creatures on the table that means that the planeswalker get's free rein, and whatever creature you can put on the table to try and lower the points is going to either get blocked, destroyed or disabled. i'm not even talking about commanders like ugin that can even exile things on cast... not even as an hability.

    I guess i'm not playing ranked brawl anymore

    please, if you are going to enable ranked brawl, just don't allow planeswalkers as commanders.

    In a 1v1 format having access to so many habilites as soon as it comes down it's unfair. there's removal for planeswalkers but it's not that common.
    it's not like creatures with summoning sickness, if they caught you with no creatures on the table that means that the planeswalker get's free rein, and whatever creature you can put on the table to try and lower the points is going to either get blocked, destroyed or disabled. i'm not even talking about commanders like ugin that… more

    5 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

20. New algorithm

    All algorithms need to be redone. Matchmaking algorithm needs to stop setting players up against direct counters to their deck, and the land/card draw algorithm needs to be adjusted. Every single game I play i almost never get more than 2 lands without at least 2 mulligans (i average 40 lands in a 100 card commander deck plus mana rocks) this should NOT happen as often as it does, and after that it is either a direct counter to my deck, I get absolutely nothing but lands all game, or I can’t get a single land to literally save my life after my starting hand. This game has the most god awful algorithms for these things I have ever seen in any game and that’s a serious statement because I play Apex legends, and up until i started playing arena i was dead convinced a game could not botch matchmaking worse than they did. Deck match ups should be based off of nothing at all but the tier your deck is to be considered based off all cards in the deck (NOT JUST COMMANDERS WHEN PLAYING BRAWL) and the land/draw algorithm need to be completely taken out and set as an actual random shuffle as the game is intended to be. I know i am not the only person who fees this way i am big into magic and know a vast amount of people in the community and everybody has the exact same issues with Arena, and honestly its to the point where its about to drive me and many others away. Everybody wants a fair game and the current algorithms in place give people anything but and it’s a serious issue that needs to be addressed immediately. Give is what we pay for.

    All algorithms need to be redone. Matchmaking algorithm needs to stop setting players up against direct counters to their deck, and the land/card draw algorithm needs to be adjusted. Every single game I play i almost never get more than 2 lands without at least 2 mulligans (i average 40 lands in a 100 card commander deck plus mana rocks) this should NOT happen as often as it does, and after that it is either a direct counter to my deck, I get absolutely nothing but lands all game, or I can’t get a single land to literally save my… more

    3 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating