1910 results found

1. flash

   Could not cast Teyo, Lightshield Expert with A white and a Red open. It effectively lost me the game.

   • 

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   2 comments  ·  Gameplay  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

2. Reclamation Sage Bug

   If you cast this submit 0 is greyed out many times and you have to wait for time out so you dont take out one of your own enchantments etc…

   3 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   1 comment  ·  Gameplay  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

3. Serious Concern About Brawl Matchmaking and Opponent Repetition

   To the MTG Arena team,

   I’m writing because I have a problem with the current Brawl matchmaking system that I don't think can really be explained away as simply getting unlucky with a few matchups.

   I want to clarify something right away because I think it is important to the context of this feedback.

   I have personally played over 4,000 Brawl games on Arena. I realize that the "Seasoned" title is associated with reaching 5,000 total games on Arena, rather than specifically 5,000 Brawl games, so I am not using that title as a measurement of Brawl experience. I simply want to give an accurate picture of where my observations are coming from. My Brawl experience alone amounts to more than 4,000 games.

   I'm not saying that makes my experience more important than anyone else's, and I'm not presenting it as a controlled statistical study. I am saying that I have spent a substantial amount of time playing Brawl and have had a very large number of opportunities to observe the matchmaking system firsthand.

   Over that time, I've noticed the same thing happening again and again. I keep getting matched against the same relatively small group of commanders, often several games in a row.

   It isn't unusual for me to see the same commander three, four, or even five games consecutively before finally getting something different. And it isn't just one commander.

   There is a recurring group that seems to show up far more often than I would expect, including Krenko, Mob Boss, Golos, Tireless Pilgrim, Esika, God of the Tree, certain mono-green Fangbearer decks, and mono-white Heliod decks.

   What really bothers me is that this doesn't seem to be limited to one deck that I'm playing.

   I've experienced the same thing while changing decks entirely, including while playing a mono-blue Urza, Lord High Artificer artifact deck, Go-Shintai of Life's Origin, Hei Bai, Forest Guardian, and Anim Pakal, Thousandth Moon. I can change what I'm playing and still end up seeing many of the same commanders.

   I'm aware that Wizards has explained how Brawl matchmaking works. I understand that Arena considers the power of the commander and deck when finding opponents, and that the goal is to prevent players from constantly getting completely mismatched games.

   I actually think that is reasonable.

   What I don't understand is why achieving reasonable power matching has to mean that players repeatedly encounter such a small portion of the available commander pool.

   Those are two different things.

   Matching me against a deck of roughly comparable strength makes sense. Matching me against roughly the same handful of commanders over and over again does not necessarily follow from that.

   Brawl has an enormous number of legal commanders. One of the things that makes the format interesting is the fact that you can sit down for a game and have absolutely no idea what you're going to face.

   The current matchmaking system can make that experience feel much smaller than the actual format.

   That's my biggest complaint.

   I'm not asking to be matched against weaker players. I'm not asking for easier games. I'm not asking to avoid powerful commanders. If I sit down and get destroyed by a powerful deck I've never seen before, that's part of playing Brawl.

   What I want is variety.

   I also think there is a larger problem here that Wizards should consider when evaluating the system.

   If matchmaking deliberately filters which commanders are allowed to encounter each other, then the games an individual player experiences aren't a random sample of the Brawl population.

   That means a player can come away from thousands of games believing that certain commanders are everywhere when, in the overall Brawl population, that may not actually be the case. The matchmaking system itself is influencing what that player sees.

   I'm not saying Wizards' internal statistics are wrong. You obviously have access to vastly more data than individual players do.

   But I do think opponent diversity and repetition should be measured alongside win rates and commander power.

   For example, I'd like to know whether Wizards tracks how many unique commanders the average player encounters over 50, 100, or 200 games.

   I'd also like to know whether you track repeated encounters with the same commander and how often players experience long streaks against the same commander or small group of commanders.

   If those numbers are being tracked, I think they're extremely relevant to determining whether the current matchmaking system is actually providing the experience Brawl players want.

   And if they're not being tracked, I think they should be.

   I also understand the argument that Brawl players have different expectations. Some people want highly competitive games, while others want to play unusual or lower-powered commanders without being immediately crushed by something far stronger.

   That's exactly why I think the solution should be giving players more choice rather than forcing everyone into one matchmaking philosophy.

   Keep the current Brawl matchmaking system for players who want power-based matchmaking.

   But give us another option.

   Call it Open Brawl, Random Brawl, or whatever makes sense.

   The basic idea would be simple: legal Brawl decks can be matched against other legal Brawl decks without the same commander/deck-power filtering that currently determines the opponent pool.

   If the queue takes longer, that's a choice the player is making.

   If someone wants carefully matched games, they use the existing queue.

   If someone wants to experience a much broader portion of the Brawl population, they use the open queue.

   I don't think that is an unreasonable request.

   If a completely open queue is something Wizards isn't willing to implement, there are other possibilities. Even something as simple as reducing the chance of immediately being matched against the same commander repeatedly would help. A diversity preference or some kind of temporary repetition protection could accomplish part of the same goal without completely removing power-based matchmaking.

   The important thing is that the current system should recognize that matchmaking quality isn't only about whether two decks are approximately equal in power.

   It's also about whether the games feel varied.

   I don't want Brawl to become a format where I know I'm likely to see the same few commanders simply because the matchmaking system has decided those are the commanders I'm supposed to play against.

   I also want to emphasize that I'm not claiming the game is secretly rigging individual games, manipulating draws, or intentionally trying to make me lose. I don't have evidence for that, and that's not what this complaint is about.

   My complaint is much simpler: the opponent pool I experience feels far too narrow for a format with this many commanders, and I've seen that pattern consistently over more than 4,000 Brawl games, despite playing multiple different decks and commanders.

   At this point, I would really like this feedback to reach the people who actually work on Brawl matchmaking rather than being treated as a normal complaint about a bad matchup.

   I'd specifically like to know:

   Does Wizards track opponent-commanders-per-player and commander repetition?
   Is there currently any mechanism intended to prevent excessive repetition?
   How much does commander choice restrict the pool of possible opponents?
   Does changing decks significantly change the commanders a player can be matched against?
   Has Wizards considered an open or less-restricted Brawl queue?
   If not, is that something the team would consider?

   I enjoy Brawl. That's why I've played over 4,000 games.

   I'm not asking Wizards to make the game easier for me. I'm asking for the opportunity to actually experience more of the format I'm playing.

   The current matchmaking system may be accomplishing its goal of finding similarly powered opponents, but I think it's worth asking whether it's accomplishing that goal at the expense of something equally important: variety.

   Please pass this feedback along to the Brawl matchmaking/product team and consider looking at opponent diversity and repeated commander encounters as part of the evaluation of the current system.

   Thank you for taking the time to read this.

   Sincerely,
   A long-time MTG Arena Brawl player

   To the MTG Arena team,

   I’m writing because I have a problem with the current Brawl matchmaking system that I don't think can really be explained away as simply getting unlucky with a few matchups.

   I want to clarify something right away because I think it is important to the context of this feedback.

   I have personally played over 4,000 Brawl games on Arena. I realize that the "Seasoned" title is associated with reaching 5,000 total games on Arena, rather than specifically 5,000 Brawl games, so I am not using that title as a measurement of Brawl experience. I simply… more

   3 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Gameplay  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

4. bug

   i'm not doing your job for you. hire more people, pay them properly, stop introducing new bugs to the game. Read the log. figure it out. fix the game.

   • 

   3 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Gameplay  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

5. Hungering Puppetbeast not giving priority at times

   This happened on a couple of turns in a row. Hungering Puppetbeast didn't give me priority during combat. I can't remember the details but I think it's possible the only mana sources I had available were Heartwood tokens and Heartwood Crafter

   2 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   1 comment  ·  Gameplay  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

6. Tomik, Izzet Sparkmage [bug]

   Tomik, Izzet Sparkmage has text "If a source you control would deal noncombat damage to an opponent or a permanent an opponent controls, it deals that much damage plus 1 instead."This ability is bugged.

   Playing on PC

   This ability does work when targetting an opponent with non combat damage. It does not work when targetting a permanent an opponent controls with non combat damage.

   I expected it to work when targetting an permanent an opponent controls with non combat damage.

   -

   No workaround

   3 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Gameplay  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

7. Cheater or completely broken card algorithm

   I’m reaching out to you because I don’t quite understand how, when I play against an opponent with a deck of more than 100 cards, usually three things happen: The first is that they tend to have a good mana curve.
   
   The second is that they usually have spells that also match their mana curve.
   
   And the third is that they often draw several copies of the same card during the game.

   I wonder if we’re dealing with cheaters who modify the game, or if the algorithm that Magic: The Gathering Arena uses is completely broken.

   The last match I played tested my patience. I’m attaching screenshots and I hope you’ll work on resolving either of the two scenarios mentioned. I don’t remember how many matches I’ve dedicated to this game, but at least over a thousand, and when it’s my turn to play with 60-card decks with 4 copies of the same card, I usually don’t get the same 'luck'.

   I’m reaching out to you because I don’t quite understand how, when I play against an opponent with a deck of more than 100 cards, usually three things happen: The first is that they tend to have a good mana curve.
   
   The second is that they usually have spells that also match their mana curve.
   
   And the third is that they often draw several copies of the same card during the game.

   I wonder if we’re dealing with cheaters who modify the game, or if the algorithm that Magic: The Gathering Arena uses is completely broken.

   The last match I… more

   •  

   •  

   •  

   •  

   •  

   4 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   1 comment  ·  Gameplay  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

8. In ranked BO3 I cant sideboard. It happens a lot of times, today I lost 2 matches because of this.

   In ranked BO3 I cant sideboard. It happens a lot of times, today I lost 2 matches because of this.

   5 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Gameplay  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

9. Hare Apparent / Bot glitch time outs.

   Hare Apparent bot account spamming attack with all available creatures, but could not pay for Dain, Lord of the Iron Halls trigger, caused the timeouts to stop working and is now stuck on their turn with declared attacks.

   Belladona Took, 9 Hare Apparent, and 26 rabbit tokens on the battlefield.
   Belladona Took, 8, and 20 tokens attacking repeatedly broke the final timeout and is now stuck on their turn.

   • 

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   2 comments  ·  Gameplay  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

10. Hexproof in response didint triggered

    Hexproof didnt do anything, i had a earthbended forest on play , they casted that black blight spell that destroys a creature, i use royal treatment in repsonse, my royal treatment resolves, then the destroy creature, and it dies???????????????????????????????????????????????????????

    • 

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Gameplay  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

11. Yuriko, Blade of the Mighty double strike

    Yuriko, Blade of the Mighty double strike damage didn't apply. I gave them flying and attacked with a 4/4 double strike. Opponent was a 5 and ended up at 1.

    •  

    2 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Gameplay  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

12. Huge stacks are punishing the ones who is playing normally.

    That is not the first time it happened, and not the first time I am saying it here.

    When someone deliberating make a huge stack of effects, like 100+ effects on pile. The resolution of the effects are draining the opponent turn timer.

    This time my opponent was using horn of gondor with lineage alter, trying to mill me out.

    By activating the horn of gondor he made a stack of around 165 mill.

    I could not answer, since I had nothing, so it was on auto play, but since arena auto play sucks, we got suck for a few time resolving the 1 on 1 mill. His timer got depleted, and that is ok, it was HIS pile, but then, it also depleted mine. I don't know WTH happened to it use my f.... Time, but it did.

    So, after then end of the pile, his turn got skipped, because he run out of time, my turn started AND GOT INSTANTLY SKIPPED.

    AS YOU ALL CAN SEE I HAD A BOARD WIPE TO TO WIN THE MATCH, BUT I COULD NOT PLAY BECAUSE OF THE BANANA CODE.

    Fix it before you lose morem obey then you are already losing.

    That is not the first time it happened, and not the first time I am saying it here.

    When someone deliberating make a huge stack of effects, like 100+ effects on pile. The resolution of the effects are draining the opponent turn timer.

    This time my opponent was using horn of gondor with lineage alter, trying to mill me out.

    By activating the horn of gondor he made a stack of around 165 mill.

    I could not answer, since I had nothing, so it was on auto play, but since arena auto play sucks, we got suck for a few… more

    •  

    •  

    3 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Gameplay  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

13. daily quests don't appear on my account

    The three daily quests have never appeared on my account on Steam.

    3 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Gameplay  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

14. Alchemy

    Delete Alchemy from Arena, is not Magic The Gathering

    5 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Gameplay  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

15. Enlightened Confidant

    Enlightened Confidant reads at beginning of your end step, if you gained life this turn, surveil 1. If you put a card with mana value less than or equal to the amount of life you gained this turn into your gaveyard this way, put that card into your hand. When I triggered Enlightend Confidant with 2 life gained at end step, it didn't give me the option to surveil, instead it popped up a screen with my graveyard and my Gallia, the Merrymaker in the graveyard. It was confusing, because I had Gallia already in the graveyard, which made me think it was selecting that card... it clearly wanted me to put it in the graveyard to trigger the effect, but I didn't understand it, so instead I topped it. Dumb I know, but maybe it should show it to me on my library to start that screen, and allow me to drag to graveyard, triggering the effect...

    Enlightened Confidant reads at beginning of your end step, if you gained life this turn, surveil 1. If you put a card with mana value less than or equal to the amount of life you gained this turn into your gaveyard this way, put that card into your hand. When I triggered Enlightend Confidant with 2 life gained at end step, it didn't give me the option to surveil, instead it popped up a screen with my graveyard and my Gallia, the Merrymaker in the graveyard. It was confusing, because I had Gallia already in the graveyard, which made me… more

    2 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Gameplay  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

16. Won a ranked brawl game but went down rank

    I won a game of ranked brawl by opponent conceding but i lost rank....

    2 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Gameplay  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

17. infinite loops making the game into rage bait

    Bloodthirsty Conqueror/Starship Cleric (and a handful of others) makes me want to throw my monitor out the window and quit playing the game.
    
    Reason 1: Is this really what the game is about? Honestly, I'm disgusted by the people running these decks. Is it fun? Does it take any skill or thought to win the match? Nope! I play two cards, watch game tick down SLOWLY over minutes until I win. No clever play, no difficult set up. Why is this allowed to exist!? What's worse, it's gaining in popularity. Every mouth breather that can't think their way out of bed is all about it. I had run in to it one time in the last month. I've hit it three times in the last hour! Different people. Platinum 2~3.
    
    Reason 2: what's worse than getting kicked square in the reproductive bits? Having it done repeatedly, agonizingly slow, and not only is there nothing you can do to stop it, but you can't leave either. You either have to sit and let the rage boil up as it ticks down taking FOOORRRREEEEVVVEEERRR or force close the game and restart. Honestly, everything about this combo is infuriating.
    I've only run across one other deck this anti spirit of the game, some land destruction deck that essentially infinite combo'd your land to zero. But you know what? At least you can concede and move on to play against someone that isn't a sadist.
    
    Just why? Why is this combo allowed to live, and why are we forced to sit and watch as the triggers take forever to tick away? If you refuse to get the garbage out of the game, at least make it so those of us having to deal with it can flee and go to greener pastures.

    Bloodthirsty Conqueror/Starship Cleric (and a handful of others) makes me want to throw my monitor out the window and quit playing the game.
    
    Reason 1: Is this really what the game is about? Honestly, I'm disgusted by the people running these decks. Is it fun? Does it take any skill or thought to win the match? Nope! I play two cards, watch game tick down SLOWLY over minutes until I win. No clever play, no difficult set up. Why is this allowed to exist!? What's worse, it's gaining in popularity. Every mouth breather that can't think their way out of… more

    3 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Gameplay  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

18. Permanents not being sacrificed from sneak attack

    My opponent played a sneak attack and attacked with an emrakul, however in end step when emrakul should be sacrificed it doesnt get sacrificed and instead loses its marking showing its temporary and going to be sacrificed

    3 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Gameplay  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

19. Mind Meanderer dying after fight with 3 Power creature

    1. I played a game in a "Premier Draft Reality Fracture" event. I controlled a Thopter token (1/1) equipped with Lich's Relic (+2/+1), so a 3/2 Thopter. My opponent played Mind Meanderer (4/4), which on ETB fights a creature. He chose to fight my 3/2 Thopter. Both creatures died, though the Mind Meanderer should've survived the fight.
    2. PC, Steam-Version of MTGA.
    3. I controlled a Thopter token (1/1) equipped with Lich's Relic (+2/+1), so a 3/2 Thopter. My opponent played Mind Meanderer (4/4), which on ETB fights a creature. He chose to fight my 3/2 Thopter. Both creatures died.
    4. The Mind Meanderer should've survived the fight.

    1. I played a game in a "Premier Draft Reality Fracture" event. I controlled a Thopter token (1/1) equipped with Lich's Relic (+2/+1), so a 3/2 Thopter. My opponent played Mind Meanderer (4/4), which on ETB fights a creature. He chose to fight my 3/2 Thopter. Both creatures died, though the Mind Meanderer should've survived the fight.
    2. PC, Steam-Version of MTGA.
    3. I controlled a Thopter token (1/1) equipped with Lich's Relic (+2/+1), so a 3/2 Thopter. My opponent played Mind Meanderer (4/4), which on ETB fights a creature. He chose to fight my 3/2 Thopter. Both creatures died.
    4. The Mind Meanderer… more
    2 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Gameplay  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

20. Bloodline Recollector

    Bloodline Recollector did not become prepared.
    
    There was an attack and a block, both creatures died. I cast multiply by zero on a third creature, which I believe count's as dying but the spell was never changed to prepared.

    2 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Gameplay  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating