3378 results found

1. White

   I think withe is too power, while oters colours as red are too weak.
   For example white has all types of magic (block opponent's creatures, power yourself and make indestructible you and your monsters, furthermore, and it is the worst problem, I think, it has mechanics that support themselves (gain hp=power creatures), and this is not possible. One or the othe other.
   Other colours have less of types of magic (are more distinct, which is a beatiful thing), for example green and red can't block or destroy with only magic the opponent's creatures, but with green you can't evocate owerpower creatures with only two manas, blue involves magic support: draw and else but weak creatures respect to other colours.
   For these reasons I think withe can't call creatures that make you gain hp while it makes 2-3 times stronger your creatures and evocate other creatures, it is ridicolous, while other colours have only few of these mechanics

   I think withe is too power, while oters colours as red are too weak.
   For example white has all types of magic (block opponent's creatures, power yourself and make indestructible you and your monsters, furthermore, and it is the worst problem, I think, it has mechanics that support themselves (gain hp=power creatures), and this is not possible. One or the othe other.
   Other colours have less of types of magic (are more distinct, which is a beatiful thing), for example green and red can't block or destroy with only magic the opponent's creatures, but with green you can't evocate owerpower… more

   2 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

2. Bugs get buried under general player gripes due to bugs & feedback being handled as a popularity contest

   Gameplay bugs/issues need to be recorded independently from general feedback for application improvement. In the first place, voting for what to work on is ridiculous - you're not children; manage your own workflows and don't just outsource it to your player base.

   Secondly, by storing these together gameplay bugs are forced to compete against UI improvements, which is nonsense. You're a mature, out-of-beta application. Fix your bugs! "I was issued a game loss due to a bug" shouldn't be competing (and losing by thousands of votes) against "something something shuffler algorithm." These are two totally separate concerns and the former is a genuine issue while the latter is a subjective quality-of-life modification.

   Gameplay bugs/issues need to be recorded independently from general feedback for application improvement. In the first place, voting for what to work on is ridiculous - you're not children; manage your own workflows and don't just outsource it to your player base.

   Secondly, by storing these together gameplay bugs are forced to compete against UI improvements, which is nonsense. You're a mature, out-of-beta application. Fix your bugs! "I was issued a game loss due to a bug" shouldn't be competing (and losing by thousands of votes) against "something something shuffler algorithm." These are two totally separate concerns and the former… more

   9 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   2 comments  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

3. Lifeline Deck Overpowered

   The lifeline deck is completely overpowered. You can drop one to three 3 mana value or less creatures and the amount of life gained overall makes each match for the opponent extremely difficult in keeping up. Add in Talassa Moon Dancer, and every time you gain a life, or Celestial Unicorn, where you gain +1/+1 counters for every life gained and the deck is officially overpowered. By the time you can get rid of the healing creatures, you're already -5 to -15 life behind in the match.

   I now quit every time I recognize I'm playing an opponent who is utilizing the life line deck because it's not even a contest/enjoyable to play again this deck at all because it's extremely overpowered. Please nerf the deck altogether so that everyone who has this deck can no longer be overpowered with it. It's definitely part of the meta right now and again, not enjoyable at all to play against. I immediately concede every time I recognize an opponent is using this deck and I've stopped using it myself because the matches where I'm using the lifeline deck I consistently win by a landslide and it's not even a challenge.

   The lifeline deck is completely overpowered. You can drop one to three 3 mana value or less creatures and the amount of life gained overall makes each match for the opponent extremely difficult in keeping up. Add in Talassa Moon Dancer, and every time you gain a life, or Celestial Unicorn, where you gain +1/+1 counters for every life gained and the deck is officially overpowered. By the time you can get rid of the healing creatures, you're already -5 to -15 life behind in the match.

   I now quit every time I recognize I'm playing an opponent who is… more

   2 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   1 comment  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

4. Organize Decks

   Could you please organize all decks in all areas alphabetically? Or give us the option?

   3 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

5. Expand the in-game store.

   There are in-game products that are no longer for sale, and good luck finding any related codes, but some players really want them. For example, I really want to buy the country flags skins for my cards; I enjoy flags personally and this would be a great touch to my experience with the game. But they were limited release. And this goes for a great number of other products I don't think will be seen again if for a long time... Yet we can still buy the packs of Historic sets easily.

   Rather than outright discontinuing them or waiting for the Daily Deals (if they even show there), just set up another store tab that's an archive of all the products that aren't being actively circulated and post them for sale, whether with coins or gems.

   There are in-game products that are no longer for sale, and good luck finding any related codes, but some players really want them. For example, I really want to buy the country flags skins for my cards; I enjoy flags personally and this would be a great touch to my experience with the game. But they were limited release. And this goes for a great number of other products I don't think will be seen again if for a long time... Yet we can still buy the packs of Historic sets easily.

   Rather than outright discontinuing them or waiting for… more

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   1 comment  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

6. Method for implementing Multiplayer

   Maybe a Left/Right arrow button around your opponent's avatar that lets you swap between active players in the match. Doing so would swipe the upper half of the table to the side as the other player comes in. Or click the opponent's avatar to bring up a combo box to pick from whatever opponent you want to see.

   This lets you keep the "one on one" interface so there's no major UI overhaul, other than swapping between who takes the upper half of the screen for you to select between players.

   2 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

7. Dismantle/Deconstruct Cards

   Given the variety of cards possible to be drawn and how that can lead to an excess of cards that players may not want provide the option to dismantle cards for a set ratio to gain wildcards to build decks that players want to use

   2 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

8. Lurrus BUG with curse of leeches

   dear support, please check interaction of lurrus and curse of leeches
   regards

   •  

   3 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

9. New playblade is (imo) a step backwards; it's clumsy and counter-intuitive.

   The new playblade causes additional "clicks" when trying to find the deck that I want to play. In the past, when I clicked on the current deck (to select a new deck), the list of valid decks would show up on the left side of the screen, with the current deck in the top-left corner. The decks that I have been playing recently then show up in sequence based on most recently played.

   Now, decks that I have edited (even just to add a style) show up with the most-recently edited deck in the top-left spot. So I either have to scroll to search for the deck, or click the big X in the upper right corner to clear that out, click Play, click the current deck, and THEN select a deck from the properly oriented list on the left.

   Is there any way to make this process work the way it did before ? Alternately, provide some options for how decks show up? I didn't see anything that would allow me to provide some control and reduce the constant clicking whenever I want to play a different deck.

   The new playblade causes additional "clicks" when trying to find the deck that I want to play. In the past, when I clicked on the current deck (to select a new deck), the list of valid decks would show up on the left side of the screen, with the current deck in the top-left corner. The decks that I have been playing recently then show up in sequence based on most recently played.

   Now, decks that I have edited (even just to add a style) show up with the most-recently edited deck in the top-left spot. So I either have… more

   3 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

10. Issue with gameplay timer

    Opponent was playing GW lifegain deck and every creature they cast caused a massive stack of triggers. I had to wait 5-10 min everytime it was their turn for everything to resolve. On my turn my timer ran out 40 sec in while actively playing cards and i wasn't given my timeout. Im not sure if/whose timer was malfunctioning. I lost because i couldn't play cards as fast as they could put triggers on the stack. If you are going to have a turn timer then have an actual turn timer. Give both players the same amount of time or at least the same amount of inactive time. Something like 30 seconds of inactivity that doesn't start counting down until 10 seconds after the last action taken. People shouldn't be penalized for actively playing.

    Opponent was playing GW lifegain deck and every creature they cast caused a massive stack of triggers. I had to wait 5-10 min everytime it was their turn for everything to resolve. On my turn my timer ran out 40 sec in while actively playing cards and i wasn't given my timeout. Im not sure if/whose timer was malfunctioning. I lost because i couldn't play cards as fast as they could put triggers on the stack. If you are going to have a turn timer then have an actual turn timer. Give both players the same amount of time or… more

    5 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

11. Enable Timer for Loops

    I just played a game (attached log) where my opponent created a loop with scurry oak + prosperous innkeeper + Heliod, sun-crowned. He proceeded to click through the cycle many times, well beyond when normally a delay timer would kick in. This gained him any desired amount of health, squirrel tokens, and +1/+1 counters on one creature. However, this did not win them the game outright. As he did not get a timer, and continued to demonstrate the loop for some time, I just conceded so I could leave and play more games, even though technically I should have gotten another turn.

    I propose a shortcutting function after X times demonstrating a loop (same actions clicked, this could have some open design space) so the game can repeat it systematically and opponent can choose to yield or choose a stop at Y loops if desired, OR at least start the timer after X times doing the same exact thing.

    This creates an abusive situation in which the looper may not be able to actually win the game, but holds their opponent ******* (I wasn't going to win this particular game, but in other games this could be important).

    Normally, in paper magic, this would be shortcuttable (it's deterministic) and a number of times would be declared and game state moved forward automatically.

    True infinite loops are actually determines a draw in paper form, although in this example scurry oak is a "may" decision.

    I just played a game (attached log) where my opponent created a loop with scurry oak + prosperous innkeeper + Heliod, sun-crowned. He proceeded to click through the cycle many times, well beyond when normally a delay timer would kick in. This gained him any desired amount of health, squirrel tokens, and +1/+1 counters on one creature. However, this did not win them the game outright. As he did not get a timer, and continued to demonstrate the loop for some time, I just conceded so I could leave and play more games, even though technically I should have gotten… more

    • 

    6 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

12. New cards are unusable/unreadable with no unique art or text.

    Cards from the new set don't show up with illustrations or understandable text. Just an exclamation point.

    • 

    3 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

13. historic brawl

    add a permanent historic brawl queue.
    there is no reason to block us form playing this other than bullsht moneygrab move
    i did not grind and buy all those cards to never use them again. this is bullsht.
    i wont drop a single penny on this game as long as you dont fully support historic cards

    27 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

14. Make alchemy only apply to alchemy not the enitre platform on arena

    It bad enough that you guys refuse to address the economy of the game, but now you are making it impossible for people who have actually put money into this game to play with the cards they have spent their hard eraned wildcards on. I get it, you want to push this new format, but at the very least make it only apply to that format. STOP MESSING WITH HISTORIC

    2 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

15. Receiving cards after already having 4 collected and in inventory.

    When you open packs, the cards given to the player are presumed to be random from the set they come from. I just received a card "Cleric Class" from the new expansion Adventures in the Forgotten Realms, after having already collected 4 of them, and the card is now nowhere to be found. I have not received gems, nor gold, nor a wildcard for this card. If the player is receiving cards that have already been collected to the maximum amount, why is the player not receiving a wildcard or gems or gold for the card that is received? There should at least be some compensation for the cards that have already been collected.

    When you open packs, the cards given to the player are presumed to be random from the set they come from. I just received a card "Cleric Class" from the new expansion Adventures in the Forgotten Realms, after having already collected 4 of them, and the card is now nowhere to be found. I have not received gems, nor gold, nor a wildcard for this card. If the player is receiving cards that have already been collected to the maximum amount, why is the player not receiving a wildcard or gems or gold for the card that is received? There… more

    8 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

16. Fallo en Recompensa de Maestría

    Buenas , estoy en el nivel 90 de maestría y me he dado cuenta de que no recibo recompensas de " Carta poco común " al subir nivel. No se desde cuando pasa pero me he percatado recientemente.
    Gracias y un saludo

    7 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

17. blizzard brawl

    Blizzard Brawl is too powerful for its mana cost vs. other cards.
    Rabid Bite and other forced fight cards cost 2 mana, and typically give no bonuses.
    Blizzard brawl gives a +1 bonus, AND also makes the creature indestructible? That is ridiculously overpowered. It has a fake BS limitation of '3 snow permanents', but that will be met just by snow lands pretty much every single time its cast, so it isn't a limitation.

    Suggest removing this card, or at the very least increasing mana cost to 2 like every other forced fight card and removing the nonsense indestructible bonus.

    4 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

18. I never...... Do this...........

    Ban Alrund's Epiphany. Ive played mtg off and on for over 20 years. Ive never came across a card that was so un fun to play against. Its not fun to play against bounce spells then be completely locked out while you lose over 4 turns without being able to respond. Ive never scooped soooo many times in response to seeing a card..

    5 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

19. 何度やってもログインができない。

    ログインが出来ない。再インストールしたり、他の端末でログインしようとしてもできないので、おそらくアカウントに問題がありそうです。
    アカウント名はAJKです。

    6 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

20. Game is still playing after turn 1 and 2 rope with no lands!?

    Played a game today where, I’m assuming, the other player had tech issues. They didn’t mulligan, accept the cards… then proceed to rope away turn one.

    Bummer. I play a land and a card and wait for the win. Sure enough, they rope out again.

    But then, surprisingly, it kicks to my turn again. So land and card, wait for the rope again. It finally happens.

    And it kicks to my turn again! The auto-concede finally happened on turn 3, with no lands in play for them.

    I don’t know if that is a bug or intentional, but it should be addressed.

    If you rope turn one and don’t play a land, it should be an auto-concede in informal formats like brawl and unranked. There’s almost no skin in the game, so why not just let the players reset and move on?

    But a turn 2 rope with no lands played? That should be an auto-concede any time, in any format. That’s not a game a Magic anymore.

    Played a game today where, I’m assuming, the other player had tech issues. They didn’t mulligan, accept the cards… then proceed to rope away turn one.

    Bummer. I play a land and a card and wait for the win. Sure enough, they rope out again.

    But then, surprisingly, it kicks to my turn again. So land and card, wait for the rope again. It finally happens.

    And it kicks to my turn again! The auto-concede finally happened on turn 3, with no lands in play for them.

    I don’t know if that is a bug or intentional, but it should… more

    •  

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close