12 results found

1. Eldrazi Titan on the second to first turn... 🤯

   I have played a one drop kitten and passed the turn and then boom the enemy played and Eldrazi titan 2nd turn... 😒

   •  

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   1 comment  ·  Gameplay  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

2. Your game says I don't have a card I have been using for HUNDREDS of games

   Yesterday I was using the deck listed below, no problem. Log on today, big problem. It's saying I don't own Kona, Rescue Beastie. When I put the same card in a standard deck it will work, but not in an alchemy deck. I'm unable to craft what it's saying I don't have which is even more frustrating so I'd appreciate a speedy reply.

   6 Island
   4 Omniscience
   4 Breeding Pool
   4 Kona, Rescue Beastie
   2 Pool Resources
   1 Indris, the Hydrostatic Surge
   4 Bounce Off
   1 Stock Up
   4 Willowrush Verge
   3 Dispelling Exhale
   4 Marang River Regent
   3 Roiling Dragonstorm
   1 Auroral Procession
   1 Mistrise Village
   4 Fuel Tank Feaster
   4 Evendo, Waking Haven
   4 Uthros, Titanic Godcore
   4 Cunning Azurescale
   2 Multiversal Passage

   Yesterday I was using the deck listed below, no problem. Log on today, big problem. It's saying I don't own Kona, Rescue Beastie. When I put the same card in a standard deck it will work, but not in an alchemy deck. I'm unable to craft what it's saying I don't have which is even more frustrating so I'd appreciate a speedy reply.

   6 Island
   4 Omniscience
   4 Breeding Pool
   4 Kona, Rescue Beastie
   2 Pool Resources
   1 Indris, the Hydrostatic Surge
   4 Bounce Off
   1 Stock Up
   4 Willowrush Verge
   3 Dispelling Exhale
   4 Marang River Regent
   3 Roiling… more

   •  

   •  

   •  

   •  

   •  

   6 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Deck Building / Collection  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

3. -1/-1 Counters to Inconsistent Creature Effect Bug

   When playing Bristlebane Battler it spawns in with 5 -1/-1 counters when it does it triggers Nest of Scarabs “Whenever you put one or more -1/-1 counters on a creature, create that many 1/1 black Insect creature tokens.” causing 5 scarabs to appear on the other hand it triggers Hapatra, Vizier of Poisons “Whenever you put one or more -1/-1 counters on a creature, create a 1/1 green Snake creature token with deathtouch.” only once spawning 1 snake token. Additionally, Obelisk Spider only triggers once as well. I feel like all should trigger 5 times but maybe there is something about the rules I don’t get.

   I am on version 2026.56.6.3997.1236969.

   Thanks!

   When playing Bristlebane Battler it spawns in with 5 -1/-1 counters when it does it triggers Nest of Scarabs “Whenever you put one or more -1/-1 counters on a creature, create that many 1/1 black Insect creature tokens.” causing 5 scarabs to appear on the other hand it triggers Hapatra, Vizier of Poisons “Whenever you put one or more -1/-1 counters on a creature, create a 1/1 green Snake creature token with deathtouch.” only once spawning 1 snake token. Additionally, Obelisk Spider only triggers once as well. I feel like all should trigger 5 times but maybe there is something… more

   0 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   1 comment  ·  Gameplay  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

4. Feedback option

   Whenever a person concedes, give them an option to describe why they conceded. It could have some standard choices like "I was about to lose anyway" or "opponent was too slow", etc. I would like an option for Brawl that lets me say "I quit because the opponent was using Alchemy/cards banned in paper multiplayer EDH" . You could also add a text box where a person could say something like "I hate Mythweaver Poq" or "Primeval Titan is annoying"

   With time this could give you some feedback on what players enjoy/don't enjoy about the platform and your choices of format styles and card availability.

   Whenever a person concedes, give them an option to describe why they conceded. It could have some standard choices like "I was about to lose anyway" or "opponent was too slow", etc. I would like an option for Brawl that lets me say "I quit because the opponent was using Alchemy/cards banned in paper multiplayer EDH" . You could also add a text box where a person could say something like "I hate Mythweaver Poq" or "Primeval Titan is annoying"

   With time this could give you some feedback on what players enjoy/don't enjoy about the platform and your choices of… more

   3 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Gameplay  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

5. Go for the Throat

   I cast Go for the Throat on a Primeval Titan when the opponent had no mana open, they did not cast anything. The system seem to accept that it was cast as it went to my graveyard. Primeval Titan did not go to the graveyard.

   • 

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Gameplay  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

6. bug na gameplay de um draft

   estava jogando um draft, e logo no inicio da partida, no primeiro turno do meu oponente que era o primeiro a jogar, uma carta do meu deck foi para o grave, sem nem ter começado o jogo, e durante o turno do oponente. ele passou o turno, eu baixei minha primeira land, e quando passei o turno para o mesmo, uma carta foi descartada da minha mao (???), eu tinha 7 na mão neste momento, nao tinha usado nenhuma magica nem nada. como se não bastasse, após isso, não consegui conceder a partida, tive que fechar o programa direto. Perdi minha partida no evento, e fico sem entender o que pode ter acontecido.

   estava jogando um draft, e logo no inicio da partida, no primeiro turno do meu oponente que era o primeiro a jogar, uma carta do meu deck foi para o grave, sem nem ter começado o jogo, e durante o turno do oponente. ele passou o turno, eu baixei minha primeira land, e quando passei o turno para o mesmo, uma carta foi descartada da minha mao (???), eu tinha 7 na mão neste momento, nao tinha usado nenhuma magica nem nada. como se não bastasse, após isso, não consegui conceder a partida, tive que fechar o programa direto.… more

   2 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Events  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

7. Thoughts on Rebalancing Non-Digital Cards in Historic and a Proposal for Restrictions and Controlled Unbans

   Thoughts on Rebalancing Non-Digital Cards in Historic and a Proposal for Restrictions and Controlled Unbans

   I’d like to share some constructive feedback regarding the current approach to rebalancing cards in Historic, particularly when it comes to non-digital (printed) cards.

   I’ve been playing Historic on MTG Arena since its very beginning, and a big part of my enjoyment comes from constant deckbuilding and testing. I like exploring the full card pool while still aiming for competitive, well-tuned decks. From that perspective, I genuinely believe Historic is a great format — but also one that could be even better with a few structural changes and a more confident use of the tools that a digital-only environment allows.

   Rebalancing non-digital cards: a solution that adds friction over time

   Digital rebalancing made a lot of sense as an initial experiment, and it still does when applied to Alchemy or fully digital designs. However, over time it has become clear — at least from my experience — that applying rebalances to iconic, non-digital cards creates unnecessary confusion and frustration.

   Cards such as:

   Agent of Treachery

   Orcish Bowmasters

   Teferi, Time Raveler

   Omnath, Locus of Creation

   Alrund’s Epiphany

   The One Ring

   are just a few examples of printed, highly iconic cards that now exist in modified digital versions within Historic. This fragments player expectations, complicates deck evaluation, and makes the format harder to approach and reason about — especially when moving between formats or discussing card power in general.

   I want to stress that these are representative examples, not an exhaustive list. My feedback applies to all non-digital cards that are currently rebalanced in Historic.

   Wizards already took a step in this direction

   Importantly, this isn’t just theoretical. A few months ago, Wizards already moved away from this philosophy by restoring The Meathook Massacre and Fires of Invention to their original versions and handling them through bans instead of rebalances.

   That decision felt like a very positive correction, and to me it strongly suggests that the team already recognizes the long-term issues caused by rebalancing printed cards. My proposal is simply to continue consistently along that same path with the rest of the affected cards.

   A cleaner alternative: original versions, bans, and restrictions

   Rather than rebalancing non-digital cards, I believe Historic would benefit from a clearer and more coherent approach:

   Use original printed versions of non-digital cards.

   Ban cards when they are truly unhealthy for the format.

   Introduce restrictions (1 copy per deck), similar to Timeless, as an intermediate and very powerful tool.

   Restricting a card preserves its identity and excitement while preventing repetitive or broken synergies. It encourages more diverse deckbuilding and avoids the binary “playable vs unplayable” outcome that bans often create.

   Personally, I think this restriction model could be valuable not only for Historic, but potentially as an experimental tool in other formats as well.

   Encouraging controlled unbans and experimentation

   In the same spirit, I’d also like to encourage re-evaluating long-banned cards. Historic has changed dramatically over time, and the card pool now includes many more answers and interaction points than when some bans were originally issued.

   Cards such as:

   Field of the Dead

   Memory Lapse

   Uro, Titan of Nature’s Wrath

   Veil of Summer

   (and others) could potentially be reintroduced under close monitoring, with the understanding that they can be quickly banned again if they prove problematic.

   The key point is not that all of these cards must remain legal, but that there should be less fear around testing and adjusting.

   Closing thoughts

   Historic is uniquely positioned as a digital-only format. That flexibility is one of its greatest strengths. Leaning into experimentation, being willing to make changes — and even to correct them shortly after if needed — would, in my opinion, bring far more benefits than risks.

   Some issues are inevitable whenever changes are made, but the long-term gains in clarity, consistency, and player trust seem well worth it.

   Thank you for taking the time to read, and for the continued work on MTG Arena and its formats.

   Thoughts on Rebalancing Non-Digital Cards in Historic and a Proposal for Restrictions and Controlled Unbans

   I’d like to share some constructive feedback regarding the current approach to rebalancing cards in Historic, particularly when it comes to non-digital (printed) cards.

   I’ve been playing Historic on MTG Arena since its very beginning, and a big part of my enjoyment comes from constant deckbuilding and testing. I like exploring the full card pool while still aiming for competitive, well-tuned decks. From that perspective, I genuinely believe Historic is a great format — but also one that could be even better with a few… more

   3 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

8. Incorrect rules interactions with kroxa and corpse explosion

   Incorrect rules interactions: i saw that when you play brawl using as commander "Kroxa, Titan of Death's Hunger" and while he's in your graveyard you exile him with Corpse Explosion to do 6 damage to the whole board, if you choose to put in the command zone, you can see that corpse explosion has "saved" the 6 damage that it should do but when it resolves it does nothing, even though it should work with the normal rulings

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   1 comment  ·  Gameplay  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

9. Game Crashes

   Game always crashes when i play this deck on PC, Android, iOs. If i try rejoin game i always got error from screenshot.

   Deck
   1 Unlicensed Hearse
   3 Infernal Grasp
   2 Voltage Surge
   4 Sheoldred, the Apocalypse
   2 Sheoldred's Restoration
   4 Liliana of the Veil
   2 Tear Asunder
   4 Titan of Industry
   4 The Cruelty of Gix
   4 Bloodtithe Harvester
   4 Fable of the Mirror-Breaker // Reflection of Kiki-Jiki
   4 Swamp
   1 Mountain
   1 Boseiju, Who Endures
   4 Haunted Ridge
   4 Deathcap Glade
   1 Rockfall Vale
   4 Ziatora's Proving Ground
   4 Sulfurous Springs
   3 Karplusan Forest

   •  

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Gameplay  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

10. Why are commander ban cards in brawl

    Why are commander banned cards in brawl on arena. Paradox engine, levold and primeval titan was banned because they’re to oppressive. So what makes these banned cards not oppressive in brawl? If anything they’re more because there is less people to deal with the problem. Also, are y’all ever going to come out with a brawl where we don’t have to play against these magic rules breaking arena only cards? Most of the arena only cards break fundamental mtg rules on several notes. A lot of us hate playing against these rule breakers.

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Gameplay  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

11. Card Style Design

    Readability should be a focus for Magic. Be that MTGA or paper Magic. I shouldnt have to struggle when trying to read a card. Players remember different things about a card. I don’t remember card names. P/T, mana cost, type, colour are more how I identify a card. That also there should be a common language for players to see the legal card (if there is an alt name, make the legal name appear in the same way every time).

    I have helped to redesign Astral Titan to make it read better. This way you can see this isnt a colourless creature and the text stands out from the image. The goal here is to have intention than looking like you just put text of a screenshot.

    Disclaimer: fonts and exact spacing do not match. This is so WotC employees can see the general idea and apply a standard for alt arts. (I’m not opposed to different boarder styles. I’m opposed to when a card becomes too hard to read at a glance.)

    Example of cards that are too illegible (based on scryfall data):

    Overlord of the Balemurk (DSK) #391
    Heat Shimmer (SPG) #137
    Selfless Safewright (ECL) #391
    The Boy in the Iceberg (TLE) #56
    The Monstrous Serpent (TLE) #51
    Strip Mine (EOS) #40 [this was partially corrected on MTGA but the name should never be located where the card type is.]
    Uthros, Titanic Godcore (EOE) #285
    Terra Branford (FCA) #5
    Enduring Innocence (DSK) #386

    Readability should be a focus for Magic. Be that MTGA or paper Magic. I shouldnt have to struggle when trying to read a card. Players remember different things about a card. I don’t remember card names. P/T, mana cost, type, colour are more how I identify a card. That also there should be a common language for players to see the legal card (if there is an alt name, make the legal name appear in the same way every time).

    I have helped to redesign Astral Titan to make it read better. This way you can see this isnt a… more

    •  

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Gameplay  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

12. Saga cards not appearing correctly on the battlefield.

    Saga cards on not appearing correctly on the battlefield. I have spent the money/gems to get the nice card styles and they look like doo doo on the battlefield. I'm on Mac, and have troubleshooted this with Chat GPT to no avail. Certain saga cards appear on the battlefield with the text inlay extending down the side of the card beyond the card edge. Instead of showing the card art graphic on the field, the game is trying to show the card as it looks in my hand and compressing it to the aspect ratio of card images that are on the field...the text is just hanging out off the right side of these cards. Looks ridiculous and I'm a bit upset since I paid actual money for the card styles. Please fix this ASAP. Thanks. Notable cards that are failing to appear correctly (it's not all sagas) : [[summon: titan]] [[summon: fenir]]

    Saga cards on not appearing correctly on the battlefield. I have spent the money/gems to get the nice card styles and they look like doo doo on the battlefield. I'm on Mac, and have troubleshooted this with Chat GPT to no avail. Certain saga cards appear on the battlefield with the text inlay extending down the side of the card beyond the card edge. Instead of showing the card art graphic on the field, the game is trying to show the card as it looks in my hand and compressing it to the aspect ratio of card images that are… more

    •  

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  User Interface  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating