9338 results found

1. Login Authentication Failure

   Last Friday, I have received a login authentication failure on my computer. It does affect the Windows PC version on MTG Arena, but I haven't tried it on the Steam version. If you have a similar issue like this, please let me know. It just happens when you try to log in the game. However, if you have the Android version of the game, it should work with a free download, as long as you have the right specs. I don't know if there are other factors that make up this bug but be vigilant if you have the Windows PC version. If you do recieve this bug, it should say "Login Failed" on the first line, then "Authentication Failed for (your username)" on the second line: all in a black screen. I'm not sure if it affects the Aetherdrift version but be aware. This is the first time I've ever encountered this issue after over 5 years of gameplay.

   Last Friday, I have received a login authentication failure on my computer. It does affect the Windows PC version on MTG Arena, but I haven't tried it on the Steam version. If you have a similar issue like this, please let me know. It just happens when you try to log in the game. However, if you have the Android version of the game, it should work with a free download, as long as you have the right specs. I don't know if there are other factors that make up this bug but be vigilant if you have the Windows… more

   4 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  User Interface  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

2. BAN HOUSEMELD IN BRAWL YOU CONTRADICTORY *****
   7 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   1 comment  ·  Gameplay  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

3. 不正行為

   相手が負け確定の場面で突然引き分けが表示された。

   3 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Gameplay  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

4. Brawl matchmaking

   Request fix to the Brawl matchmaking system or a notice to the player-base that you have no intention of ever fixing it.

   The last update from the addition of aetherdrift to MTG Arena, has drastically altered the previous matchmaking balance and has still not been fixed. Prior to the patch, the matchmaking was still not great but was tolerable enough with hopes that it might be actually be tuned better in the future. Its been almost a month since this became an issue and its still in a practically unplayable state with matches being one sided.

   The silence on this issue and the neglect of the brawl que will have lastly consequences on the brawl player-base and ultimately drive customers away from the platform. I loved what brawl was and could have been, but now the only way to have a chance at "fair" matchmaking is to play it with a "****" que commander.

   Request fix to the Brawl matchmaking system or a notice to the player-base that you have no intention of ever fixing it.

   The last update from the addition of aetherdrift to MTG Arena, has drastically altered the previous matchmaking balance and has still not been fixed. Prior to the patch, the matchmaking was still not great but was tolerable enough with hopes that it might be actually be tuned better in the future. Its been almost a month since this became an issue and its still in a practically unplayable state with matches being one sided.

   The silence on this… more

   9 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

5. Ban bloodthirsty conqueror

   Bloodthirsty conqueror enters the field and it’s an automatic win, please remove it from alchemy or standard or from any type of game format, or do you really not care about these game flaws? Isn't for that reason why there are different game formats?

   10 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   2 comments  ·  Gameplay  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

6. Segregate Alchemy in Brawl

   Dear WOTC,

   It is no shock that 95% of your community hates Alchemy. It's probably one of the worst ideas you have ever come up with. Not only are the cards completely broken, you force players to have to face them in Brawl. Brawl is the closest product you offer to Duel Commander on Arena, yet you don't adhere to its ban list, you make rebalancings that are not logical according to the power level and force feed players the Alchemy card pool. The result is that a Brawl player who wants to get as close as possible to paper magic has to play with a nerfed Guide of Souls or Teferi, time raveler, while its opponents can play Oracles of the Alpha, Mythweaver Poqs and other completely unbalanced cards. This is terribly frustrating, and makes every Brawl player who likes paper magic want to not ever touch the format again. In fact, personally, the only reason I keep playing Brawl is because MTGO is too expensive, otherwise I would have ditched the format years ago.

   My suggestions to improve this situation are quite simple:

   1 - Segregate Alchemy from Brawl. You can still have an Alchemy Brawl format for those who wish to play with this card pool.
   2 - Remove rebalancings such as Teferi, time raveler, guide of souls, etc. in Brawl. They make no sense in a format where you are allowing Chrome moxes and other incredibly powerful cards.
   3 - Get more in line with the Duel Commander ban list. There is also no reason to ban cards such as Drannith Magistrate or Medling Mage. I get it, people want to cast their commanders, but these are cards that are part of a game of Commander, and you do not need to infantilize your Arena players.
   4 - We are still missing an incredibly large card pool in Brawl, even from very recent sets. Some examples include Pyrogoyf, Broadside Bombardiers, etc, etc. While I understand that including all new cards is a big effort, you are at the same time producing new Alchemy cards 95% of your community hates. Why not devoting that effort to actually include cards you release in paper sets?

   While I understand your view might not be aligned with mine, I hope you can give a consideration to some of these ideas, which in my honest opinion, they would greatly improve the Brawl experience on Arena.

   Kind Regards,
   - A MTG enthusiast that has been playing paper magic for over 20+ years :)

   Dear WOTC,

   It is no shock that 95% of your community hates Alchemy. It's probably one of the worst ideas you have ever come up with. Not only are the cards completely broken, you force players to have to face them in Brawl. Brawl is the closest product you offer to Duel Commander on Arena, yet you don't adhere to its ban list, you make rebalancings that are not logical according to the power level and force feed players the Alchemy card pool. The result is that a Brawl player who wants to get as close as possible to paper… more

   9 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Gameplay  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

7. Gain life/lose life bug

   "Whenever you gain life, opponent loses life" stuck on a loop and is an immediate loss.

   7 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   1 comment  ·  Gameplay  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

8. Kicked from Games

   Kicked from games leading to losses in Draft. Loading in fine and no issues but the the game kicks me for some reason and then leads to losses on priemier draft.

   5 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Gameplay  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

9. Loss of connectivity registered as a 'loss' during event

   Hi, I am user 'Mage you look #14859'

   Today I have taken part in an event 'Premier Draft Aetherdraft Alchemy'

   I lost connectivity during the third game I played and it was recorded as a loss. I haven't clicked 'claim' yet. Could you please delete the second loss so I can continue playing or credit me with a token so I can start again?

   3 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   1 comment  ·  Events  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

10. hand smoothing issues

    i have noticed a few things about hand smoothing that really dont work well.

    1. it curves your hand to be competitive against the other persons deck and if your deck isnt tuned for low cost or high cost gameplay it forces your hand to have a bunch of ****** low cost one ofs or a bunch of land and spells you really dont need till late game. (playing combo against red goblins or mono red burn forces a midrange hand to be full of one cmc cards. playing midrange against ramp it forces your hand to be full of land and mana sources and no early game creatures because they are ramping to a bunch of large creatures.)

    2. color fixing is based on both players colors and deck types not just yours and the opponents.
       (more times than i can count i play multicolor decks a lot and if someone is playing one of my colors the hand smoothing will imbalance the color focus to the other player and my hands will be reduced in those colors. i have noticed this the most with red and blue. if they are playing a heavy red or heavy blue deck they will get an unproportionate amount of those colors and i wont get any of those colors of land but a lot of those colors of cards. its like the hand smoothing is counting both decks as one game and one deck and is buggy so it splits them unevenly even while mulliganing.)

    3. i have alos noticed the 3 ofs and 4 ofs always stick together. (for example etali's favor playing 4 it is fairly consistent to chain 2-4 etali's in a row. the card draw and hand smoothing are clunky and are making it to where 4 ofs especially are one right after another no matter what type of card they are and what their mana cost is. i think 2 together is normal but playing one etali and chaining into 3 others with a considerable amount of 1 2 and 3 drops is not cool. same with llanowar elves. i dont really want 4 llanowar elves in the first 15 cards of the deck 80% of the time and if i reduce them to 3 of i really dont see them in the opening hand more than 17% of the time and they always end up in hands without any green land.)

    4. fabled passages and other search lands or colorless lands are not being counted correctly same with x cost spells and hybrid cost mana symbols.

    (it seems like the hand smoothing is counting search lands as higher priority in the opening hand than multicolor lands. this goes back to the 4 ofs thing where the game forces clumps of four ofs at the beginning even though there are 19 other lands including untapped duals and pain lands the game forces the fabled passages and other search land 4 ofs to the front of the deck in large clumps.)
    (the x spells tend to be counted as low cost cards and are forced into opening hands regularly even if you are only running 1 or 2. the proximity to the opening hand should be calculated based on average casting cost of the x cost spells. usually 3 or more so i think they should be counted by the hand smoothing as cards that equal 2 or 3 plus the regular mana symbols cost.)

    i have noticed a few things about hand smoothing that really dont work well.

    1. it curves your hand to be competitive against the other persons deck and if your deck isnt tuned for low cost or high cost gameplay it forces your hand to have a bunch of ****** low cost one ofs or a bunch of land and spells you really dont need till late game. (playing combo against red goblins or mono red burn forces a midrange hand to be full of one cmc cards. playing midrange against ramp it forces your hand to be full of land… more

    3 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Gameplay  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

11. hand smoothing imbalanced

    i have noticed a few things about hand smoothing that really dont work well.

    1. it curves your hand to be competitive against the other persons deck and if your deck isnt tuned for low cost or high cost gameplay it forces your hand to have a bunch of ****** low cost one ofs or a bunch of land and spells you really dont need till late game. (playing combo against red goblins or mono red burn forces a midrange hand to be full of one cmc cards. playing midrange against ramp it forces your hand to be full of land and mana sources and no early game creatures because they are ramping to a bunch of large creatures.)

    2. color fixing is based on both players colors and deck types not just yours and the opponents.
       (more times than i can count i play multicolor decks a lot and if someone is playing one of my colors the hand smoothing will imbalance the color focus to the other player and my hands will be reduced in those colors. i have noticed this the most with red and blue. if they are playing a heavy red or heavy blue deck they will get an unproportionate amount of those colors and i wont get any of those colors of land but a lot of those colors of cards. its like the hand smoothing is counting both decks as one game and one deck and is buggy so it splits them unevenly even while mulliganing.)

    3. i have alos noticed the 3 ofs and 4 ofs always stick together. (for example etali's favor playing 4 it is fairly consistent to chain 2-4 etali's in a row. the card draw and hand smoothing are clunky and are making it to where 4 ofs especially are one right after another no matter what type of card they are and what their mana cost is. i think 2 together is normal but playing one etali and chaining into 3 others with a considerable amount of 1 2 and 3 drops is not cool. same with llanowar elves. i dont really want 4 llanowar elves in the first 15 cards of the deck 80% of the time and if i reduce them to 3 of i really dont see them in the opening hand more than 17% of the time and they always end up in hands without any green land.)

    4. fabled passages and other search lands or colorless lands are not being counted correctly same with x cost spells and hybrid cost mana symbols.

    (it seems like the hand smoothing is counting search lands as higher priority in the opening hand than multicolor lands. this goes back to the 4 ofs thing where the game forces clumps of four ofs at the beginning even though there are 19 other lands including untapped duals and pain lands the game forces the fabled passages and other search land 4 ofs to the front of the deck in large clumps.)
    (the x spells tend to be counted as low cost cards and are forced into opening hands regularly even if you are only running 1 or 2. the proximity to the opening hand should be calculated based on average casting cost of the x cost spells. usually 3 or more so i think they should be counted by the hand smoothing as cards that equal 2 or 3 plus the regular mana symbols cost.)

    i have noticed a few things about hand smoothing that really dont work well.

    1. it curves your hand to be competitive against the other persons deck and if your deck isnt tuned for low cost or high cost gameplay it forces your hand to have a bunch of ****** low cost one ofs or a bunch of land and spells you really dont need till late game. (playing combo against red goblins or mono red burn forces a midrange hand to be full of one cmc cards. playing midrange against ramp it forces your hand to be full of land… more

    2 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Gameplay  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

12. Standard Event win counted as loss

    I had two losses already in a standard event. Then I wanna match and it treated it as a loss and kicked me out of the event.

    4 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Events  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

13. Disconnected Mid-match

    1. Be in a match. Lose connection even momentarily
    2. iOS
    3. Get kicked out of the match. Sometimes restarting the client enables me to reconnect. Other times it does not.
    4. Not get kicked out in the first place or at the very least make it easy to reconnect.
    5. Not much to show. It brings me back to the match screen and only records it as a loss later.
    6. As mentioned, sometimes closing the game and reopening it allows me to reconnect.

    All in all, a very frustrating experience. Makes me not want to play the game at home.

    3 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Events  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

14. Matchmaking

    The MTG Arena matchmaking system and algorithm for best of one needs to be overhauled. You cannot tell me that it is randomized or a fair matchmaking system whenever I just put together a new deck tonight (Dimir Mill) and proceed to face Azorius Omniscience, 4 out of 5 matches. The 1 match that I didn't play against it, I won because it was an unfair matchup and my opponent was forced to lose due to land flooding.

    Stop dictating matches for best of one based on land shorting/flooding and stop doing unfair matches. Let matches be completely randomized. I don't need to draw 7 lands whenever I know I'm going to lose due to the match up. Allow the players to be skilled enough to deal with random deck matches and not win or lose based on what the algorithm says. No one can beat an Omniscience deck on turn four unless they run early graveyard hate. Why match me up against it 4 out of 5 games?

    Wizards needs to be open and clear on how the matchmaking and shuffler system works. I understand that best of three is available but it still does the same matchmaking as best of one and takes longer.

    There are so many people complaining about the matchmaking in this game it's unbelievable. These types of shuffles don't happen in real life. Get your dev team together and figure it out!

    The MTG Arena matchmaking system and algorithm for best of one needs to be overhauled. You cannot tell me that it is randomized or a fair matchmaking system whenever I just put together a new deck tonight (Dimir Mill) and proceed to face Azorius Omniscience, 4 out of 5 matches. The 1 match that I didn't play against it, I won because it was an unfair matchup and my opponent was forced to lose due to land flooding.

    Stop dictating matches for best of one based on land shorting/flooding and stop doing unfair matches. Let matches be completely randomized. I… more

    8 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Gameplay  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

15. Upkeep Triggers

    Triggers on the beginning of upkeep do not allow you to respond to them. A player should not be compelled to put a stop on their upkeeps to respond to a trigger, eg. demonic pact, unless you put a stop on your upkeep will cause you to instantly lose the game, when you could easily respond to all of its triggers.

    3 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Gameplay  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

16. Seeking an Urza land with Urza's Construction Drone caused a visible card to no longer be visible

    Hi Wizards,

    I was playing in Brawl yesterday with my Borborygmos and Fblthp deck. On a previous turn had chosen to put Borborygmos and Fblthp into my library. On the next turn, I decided to attack with the Urza's Construction Drone I had on the board. I made sure to check that Borborygmos and Fblthp was still two cards down in my library. Attacking triggered the Drone to seek an Urza land in the library, but Borborygmos and Fblthp was no longer visually shown in my library.

    I don't believe the library was shuffled because I drew Borborygmos and Fblthp and several other cards on my next turn when I used the card draw ability on Loot, the Pathfinder.

    Hi Wizards,

    I was playing in Brawl yesterday with my Borborygmos and Fblthp deck. On a previous turn had chosen to put Borborygmos and Fblthp into my library. On the next turn, I decided to attack with the Urza's Construction Drone I had on the board. I made sure to check that Borborygmos and Fblthp was still two cards down in my library. Attacking triggered the Drone to seek an Urza land in the library, but Borborygmos and Fblthp was no longer visually shown in my library.

    I don't believe the library was shuffled because I drew Borborygmos and Fblthp… more

    2 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Gameplay  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

17. Get rid of Alchemy

    Get rid of Alchemy. It sucks. It's no fun playing against people who use Alchemy cards when I'm just trying to replicate the experience of playing with real cards. It's impossible to keep track of everything Alchemy cards do and I really just hate seeing them in Brawl games.

    4 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

18. Got mana flooded at a key moment, this needs to be fixed please!

    Got mana flooded in draft at a key moment, while my opponent continued to draw gas. I drew multiple lands in a row with no cards in hand, where my opponent continued to draw value every turn. Either he was hacking or your shuffler is broken. Please fix!!

    2 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Gameplay  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

19. Wish

    When playing a Wish deck with Lier, Disciple of the Drowned, cards in my graveyard can be cast with flashback. This causes my whole graveyard to appear next to my hand and takes up the entire bottom of the screen. The issue is, with all the cards near the bottom of the screen, I cannot scroll to activate my Wish and cast a card from my sideboard. I've lost many games from this issue.

    3 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Gameplay  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

20. Make Alchemy "Standard plus" again

    First, I'm a big fan of the whole concept of Alchemy. Using the unique design space that a digital version of the game allows for is a lot of fun.

    That being said, I was a big fan of the Alchemy format until a year or two ago when Standard switched to a three-year rotation but Alchemy did not. One of the great aspects of Alchemy was its easy overhead: you could add a few Alchemy cards (or not!) to your existing favorite Standard deck and have at it. Of course the Alchemy-specific builds are fun too, it's just that (at least for me) Alchemy's connection to Standard was part of what made it such a fun format. "Standard plus".

    I really just don't see value in having split the formats apart like this. Please consider updating Alchemy to have the same rotation schedule as Standard.

    First, I'm a big fan of the whole concept of Alchemy. Using the unique design space that a digital version of the game allows for is a lot of fun.

    That being said, I was a big fan of the Alchemy format until a year or two ago when Standard switched to a three-year rotation but Alchemy did not. One of the great aspects of Alchemy was its easy overhead: you could add a few Alchemy cards (or not!) to your existing favorite Standard deck and have at it. Of course the Alchemy-specific builds are fun too, it's just that… more

    2 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating