560 results found

1. Why would you be dumb enough to include this card in this event?????

   Card text:
   You and your opponent exile cards from the top of their library until they hit a nonland card at the beginning of your upkeep...

   The event's deck is all lands...
   Your upkeep happens... you exile your deck, then as the effect fizzles out as you can't cast anything, you then go to draw a card and are defeated as you now have no cards you're able to draw...

   Why in the **** would you include stuff with effects like this... right now I'm basically waiting for my opponents to hopefully concede three times without actually playing this stupid event. Yay 30-second timers.

   Card text:
   You and your opponent exile cards from the top of their library until they hit a nonland card at the beginning of your upkeep...

   The event's deck is all lands...
   Your upkeep happens... you exile your deck, then as the effect fizzles out as you can't cast anything, you then go to draw a card and are defeated as you now have no cards you're able to draw...

   Why in the **** would you include stuff with effects like this... right now I'm basically waiting for my opponents to hopefully concede three times without actually playing this… more

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Gameplay  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

2. The Masamune Bug

   I just played a game of sealed in which I had the Masamune attached to a Gaelicat, also with the Monk’s fist equipped, making it a 4/3 flyer with vigilance, and first strike on my turn. The card text also reads “As long as creature is attacking, it must be blocked if able. The opponent had a PuPu UFO untapped in defense. I declared attacks and they were not forced to block. On the next turn, the PuPu was able to attack and did damage, when it should have already been dead. I am unclear why the opponent’s creature did not have to defend.

   I just played a game of sealed in which I had the Masamune attached to a Gaelicat, also with the Monk’s fist equipped, making it a 4/3 flyer with vigilance, and first strike on my turn. The card text also reads “As long as creature is attacking, it must be blocked if able. The opponent had a PuPu UFO untapped in defense. I declared attacks and they were not forced to block. On the next turn, the PuPu was able to attack and did damage, when it should have already been dead. I am unclear why the opponent’s creature did… more

   2 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   1 comment  ·  Gameplay  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

3. quina, qu gourmet + retrieve the esper possible bug

   If one flashbacks "retrieve the esper" while Quina is on the board, they get an 1/1 frog with two +1/+1 counter on it, which I think is an incorrect ruling.

   2 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   1 comment  ·  Gameplay  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

4. Bulwark Ox Hexproof Failure Against Stasis Snare

   I had four creatures in play, but only two are relevant to explain this bug. I had Bulwark Ox and Caradora, Heart of Alacria out on the board in a standard best of one match. Caradora had two +1/+1 counters on it. My opponent played stasis snare, targeting Caradora. In response, I sacrificed Bulwark Ox to give all my creatures with counters Indestructible and Hexproof. Despite the sacrifice trigger resolving, Caradora was still exiled under the Stasis Snare. My opponent controlled no effect that would have negated Hexproof such as Nowhere To Run so, from my understanding of the rules, the temporary Hexproof given to Caradora should have protected her. Sadly, I took no pictures.

   I had four creatures in play, but only two are relevant to explain this bug. I had Bulwark Ox and Caradora, Heart of Alacria out on the board in a standard best of one match. Caradora had two +1/+1 counters on it. My opponent played stasis snare, targeting Caradora. In response, I sacrificed Bulwark Ox to give all my creatures with counters Indestructible and Hexproof. Despite the sacrifice trigger resolving, Caradora was still exiled under the Stasis Snare. My opponent controlled no effect that would have negated Hexproof such as Nowhere To Run so, from my understanding of the rules… more

   • 

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Gameplay  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

5. Make Your Move

   The white card Make Your Move is programmed incorrectly in Arena. The card text (in both Arena and in real life) says "destroy target creature with POWER 4 or greater." However, in the last few days since I added the Fire Navy Trebuchet card from the new Avatar expansion to my deck, I've repeatedly had people use Make Your Move to destroy it. This creature is 0/4. That's 0 power, 4 TOUGHNESS. For some reason Arena is accepting it as a valid target even though it isn't. The point of the card is to be able to kill strong creatures, something White favors and bashing my poor little defender creature with it is making me sad.

   The white card Make Your Move is programmed incorrectly in Arena. The card text (in both Arena and in real life) says "destroy target creature with POWER 4 or greater." However, in the last few days since I added the Fire Navy Trebuchet card from the new Avatar expansion to my deck, I've repeatedly had people use Make Your Move to destroy it. This creature is 0/4. That's 0 power, 4 TOUGHNESS. For some reason Arena is accepting it as a valid target even though it isn't. The point of the card is to be able to kill strong creatures,… more

   •  

   •  

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   1 comment  ·  Gameplay  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

6. No window to response with an instant

   Hello,

   I encountered what I believe to be a bug involving the card Traveling Chocobo. In my match, my opponent cast Traveling Chocobo, and I intended to destroy it immediately after it entered the battlefield—before its ability could be used—by playing another Chocobo along with a land.

   However, the game did not provide me with a priority window to act at that point. Instead, it skipped directly to the moment when my opponent was able to play a land to trigger the ability. At that stage, even if I destroyed the Traveling Chocobo, the effect had already been triggered, and it was too late to stop it.

   This effectively makes it impossible to respond with any instant-speed removal unless you have a counterspell, which means that if you are not playing blue, you cannot prevent the ability from resolving. This feels extremely unfair and inconsistent with the expected rules interaction, where instant-speed removal should be allowed before such a trigger occurs.

   Could you please review this interaction? I believe the game is incorrectly skipping a priority pass between the Traveling Chocobo entering the battlefield and its controller playing a land.

   Thank you for your attention.

   Hello,

   I encountered what I believe to be a bug involving the card Traveling Chocobo. In my match, my opponent cast Traveling Chocobo, and I intended to destroy it immediately after it entered the battlefield—before its ability could be used—by playing another Chocobo along with a land.

   However, the game did not provide me with a priority window to act at that point. Instead, it skipped directly to the moment when my opponent was able to play a land to trigger the ability. At that stage, even if I destroyed the Traveling Chocobo, the effect had already been triggered, and… more

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   2 comments  ·  Gameplay  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

7. Toxic

   I have a creature with toxic 1. I equip and artifact that gives it toxic 1. With the new ruling the toxics stack and it should give the opponent 2 poision not one. Each toxic 1 should hit.

   4 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Gameplay  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

8. Option to Toggle Opponent Mouse Highlights Off

   Dear Wizards of the Coast MTG Arena Development Team,
   I am writing to respectfully request the implementation of an option to toggle off the visual highlighting of cards when an opponent hovers their mouse over them. As a dedicated player who frequently engages with MTG Arena, particularly for ranked play and as a free-to-play participant striving to progress, I find this particular visual cue significantly detracts from my gameplay experience.
   My primary reasons for this request are:

   • Distraction and Focus: During intense matches, especially when reading complex card text, calculating board states, or strategizing intricate lines of play, the constant flashing and highlighting of cards by an opponent's mouse can be highly distracting. It disrupts my concentration and requires additional mental effort to filter out this visual noise, which can be particularly taxing during extended play sessions.

   • Unintended Meta-Gaming/Annoyance: While I understand the intent may be to show activity, this feature is sometimes used in ways that are not conducive to a positive player experience. I've observed instances where players seem to deliberately hover over cards to annoy or mislead, such as repeatedly highlighting a creature I would be forced to sacrifice, even though the choice is ultimately mine. While this doesn't alter the game's outcome, it does introduce an element of unnecessary interruption and frustration.
     A simple "toggle on/off" option in the game settings for opponent mouse highlights would greatly enhance the quality of life for many players who share this sentiment. It would allow players to customize their visual experience to better suit their individual preferences and focus needs, without impacting those who find the feature useful.
     Thank you for considering this feedback. I believe that providing players with more control over their UI experience will contribute to an even more enjoyable and competitive MTG Arena environment.
     Sincerely,
     Chubeelius (Hun)

   Dear Wizards of the Coast MTG Arena Development Team,
   I am writing to respectfully request the implementation of an option to toggle off the visual highlighting of cards when an opponent hovers their mouse over them. As a dedicated player who frequently engages with MTG Arena, particularly for ranked play and as a free-to-play participant striving to progress, I find this particular visual cue significantly detracts from my gameplay experience.
   My primary reasons for this request are:

   • Distraction and Focus: During intense matches, especially when reading complex card text, calculating board states, or strategizing intricate lines of play, the… more

   2 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   1 comment  ·  Gameplay  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

9. Review/Insight on Spells/Effects/Abilities

   Can we get some reviews as to whether or not some spells actually work in game? Newer member to the Magic community but when it comes to spells, abilities, and effects the rules seem very straight forward as to just follow what the card says. So please correct me if I'm wrong and please provide some insight as to why so I have a better understanding.

   My example of this as it happened to me last night playing Brawl in Arena. I was using my commander to attack, my opponent had a creature with Deathtouch. Knowing this, I played the instant spell Not Dead After All, and applied it to my commander which would allow my commander to die but then return to the battlefield tapped. This was not the case. My commander died and was sent back to the command zone and the mana cost to cast was increased, it never went back to the battlefield as the Not Dead After All card described it would. As a side note, my opponent had no cards in his hand to perform a counter spell.

   When doing a google search, google says Deathtouch does not negate spells so I'm just a bit confused as to why my spell didn't work on my commander. The only thing I can think of is maybe because my commander has Ward the spell didn't activate, but I thought Ward was for enemy spells and not my own. Double checking the rule book, it states Ward is for enemy spells/abilities

   Can we get some reviews as to whether or not some spells actually work in game? Newer member to the Magic community but when it comes to spells, abilities, and effects the rules seem very straight forward as to just follow what the card says. So please correct me if I'm wrong and please provide some insight as to why so I have a better understanding.

   My example of this as it happened to me last night playing Brawl in Arena. I was using my commander to attack, my opponent had a creature with Deathtouch. Knowing this, I played the… more

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   2 comments  ·  Gameplay  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

10. Fatal Push Not Triggering

    Playing on mobile (android), during opponents first main phase, my opponent has me at 6 life and has a Phlage Fire of Titans Fury on the battlefield. Opponent escapes a second copy of Phlage and deals me 3 damage. He has to sacrifice one copy to legend rule. Second copy goes to graveyard. Before moving to combat, I cast Fatal Push targeting Phlage but it fizzles with no effect. Phlage is 3 CMC but the legend rule sacrifice apparently did not trigger Push's kill up to 4 CMC effect. Opponent moves to combat and kills me with Phlage's triggered ability. This sucks.

    Playing on mobile (android), during opponents first main phase, my opponent has me at 6 life and has a Phlage Fire of Titans Fury on the battlefield. Opponent escapes a second copy of Phlage and deals me 3 damage. He has to sacrifice one copy to legend rule. Second copy goes to graveyard. Before moving to combat, I cast Fatal Push targeting Phlage but it fizzles with no effect. Phlage is 3 CMC but the legend rule sacrifice apparently did not trigger Push's kill up to 4 CMC effect. Opponent moves to combat and kills me with Phlage's triggered ability.… more

    •  

    2 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Gameplay  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

11. Drakuseth, Maw of Flames card issue

    the text states that it deals 4 damage to any target, then 3 damage to up to two targets. If I don’t select exactly three targets he doesn’t do ANY of these damages.

    2 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Gameplay  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

12. All Will Be One not functioning correctly.

    I am on PC, though my platform is kind of irrelevant to the issue at hand. The Enchantment All Will Be One has the following ability: "Whenever you put one or more counters on a permanent or player, this enchantment deals that much damage to target opponent, creature an opponent controls, or planeswalker opponent controls." However, in game, the 'or' in that ability is treated as an 'and', meaning whenever, say, a Vivi Ornitier player puts a +1/+1 counter on Vivi, instead of dealing 1 damage to their opponent, OR a creature they control, OR a planeswalker they control, they are instead allowed to do all three. This is blatantly contrary to the text of the card, and is clearly a bug.

    I am on PC, though my platform is kind of irrelevant to the issue at hand. The Enchantment All Will Be One has the following ability: "Whenever you put one or more counters on a permanent or player, this enchantment deals that much damage to target opponent, creature an opponent controls, or planeswalker opponent controls." However, in game, the 'or' in that ability is treated as an 'and', meaning whenever, say, a Vivi Ornitier player puts a +1/+1 counter on Vivi, instead of dealing 1 damage to their opponent, OR a creature they control, OR a planeswalker they control, they… more

    •  

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Gameplay  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

13. metropolis

    When I have "Metropolis Reformer" in play, I'm still targeted by spells and effects from my opponent and his creatures. May be I'm misinterpreting the rule?

    May be you could make a simple test to verify it. Just make a player play Metropolis Reformer and his opponent cast a spell targeting the first one.

    I'm using PC

    Thanks

    2 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Gameplay  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

14. Loot,Exuberant Explorer giving haste to summons with Vigilance?

    PC client, Windows 10, Steam.

    Apothecary Stompers were able to attack on the round they entered.

    They were all summoned by Loot, Exuberant Explorer's mana activated ability.

    The Apothecary Stompers did display the summoning sickness dark swirl animation when they came into play, then the new summon stacked on the previous Stomper, the swirl animation disappeared, and they were able to attack.

    Didn't observe any buff in effect style Haste text on the Apothecary Stomper cards.

    The board was pretty sparse when this happened so I don't think this was just an overlooked effect on my part. I was on the receiving end, and rather surprised the first time, but by the third summon I was looking pretty hard for what was going on, and couldn't see any card effect on the board that would explain the behavior.

    PC client, Windows 10, Steam.

    Apothecary Stompers were able to attack on the round they entered.

    They were all summoned by Loot, Exuberant Explorer's mana activated ability.

    The Apothecary Stompers did display the summoning sickness dark swirl animation when they came into play, then the new summon stacked on the previous Stomper, the swirl animation disappeared, and they were able to attack.

    Didn't observe any buff in effect style Haste text on the Apothecary Stomper cards.

    The board was pretty sparse when this happened so I don't think this was just an overlooked effect on my part. I was on… more

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Gameplay  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

15. No hexproof

    I had 4 creatures on the board and the enemy played Split Up. I proceeded to use Snakeskin Veil on my Mossborn Hydra so give it hexproof to protect it from dying. So Snakeskin Veil landed then when Split Up landed it destroyed my Mossborn Hydra. How can a creature with hexproof die from a opponent's spell. This cost me the game and I was going to hit for 600+ damage the next turn

    •  

    2 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Gameplay  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

16. Avatar Destiny

    When the card Avatar Destiny was attached to an animated land (enchanting a creature-land), the land was subsequently put into the graveyard. Under normal rules, the triggered ability of Avatar Destiny should have resolved—allowing me to mill cards, return a card from my graveyard to hand, and return Avatar Destiny itself to my hand.

    However, due to the earthbend ability triggering as the land died, the land was returned directly to the battlefield. This appears to have interfered with the game's ability resolution, causing Avatar Destiny’s triggered ability to fail to resolve entirely.

    3 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Gameplay  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

17. No hexproof

    I had 4 creatures on the board and the enemy played Split Up. I proceeded to use Snakeskin Veil on my Mossborn Hydra so give it hexproof to protect it from dying. So Snakeskin Veil landed then when Split Up landed it destroyed my Mossborn Hydra. How can a creature with hexproof die from a opponent's spell. This cost me the game and I was going to hit for 600+ damage the next turn

    2 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Gameplay  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

18. MTG game Timeless - Emrakul The Aeons Torn card not correct working wth Static Prison

    I played a Game in timeless and i have just played Ghalta the Stampede tyrant and got Emrakul The Aeons Torn out my opponent played Static Prison and coult Target Emrakul The Aeons Torn with it bu on the card it clearly says Protections from spells with 1 or more colors. this is a very clear Error and bug and should not even work. i would suggest fix this emediatly because this makes the card complete broken towards one of the most popular cards in the game

    Fix Emrakul please

    •  

    •  

    •  

    2 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Gameplay  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

19. Incorrect interaction between Valki, God of Lies and Plargg, Dean of Chaos / Augusta, Dean of Order

    Valki, God of Lies has a bug with double-faced cards. I specifically encountered this with Plargg, Dean of Chaos//Augusta, Dean of Order:

    Step 1: Valki enters, exiles Plargg//Augusta
    Step 2: Activate Valki, X >= 2, select Plargg//Augusta

    Expected result: Valki copies Plargg (front face), and only the text/abilities on the front face are available/active.

    Actual Result: Valki copies Plargg (front face), but also copies Augusta's (back face) static abilities, and then also incorrectly applies them to itself.

    Unknown: I do not know if this also copies Augusta's triggered ability, as I did not attack while it was on the battlefield. I do not know if this bug is also in play with double-faced cards other than Plargg//Augusta, but some good candidate cards to check for the interaction would likely be Enduring Angel, Nicol Bolas the Ravager, and Valki itself.

    Log at about a turn after Valki copied Plargg attached.

    Valki, God of Lies has a bug with double-faced cards. I specifically encountered this with Plargg, Dean of Chaos//Augusta, Dean of Order:

    Step 1: Valki enters, exiles Plargg//Augusta
    Step 2: Activate Valki, X >= 2, select Plargg//Augusta

    Expected result: Valki copies Plargg (front face), and only the text/abilities on the front face are available/active.

    Actual Result: Valki copies Plargg (front face), but also copies Augusta's (back face) static abilities, and then also incorrectly applies them to itself.

    Unknown: I do not know if this also copies Augusta's triggered ability, as I did not attack while it was on the… more

    • 

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Gameplay  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

20. Inconsistent rulings with The Darkness Crystal

    I believe [The Darkness Crystal] is coded wrong or the rulings around it are wrong. This applies to if a dying creature would gain you enough life to survive after being put to 0 life. An example would be an opponent's nontoken creature dying in combat but another creature hitting you down to 0 or -1. The question is would you survive at 1 or 2 life in this senario?

    (In this situation, for ease, all creatures are vanilla 2/2s) Currently Arena says the opponent's creature would be exiled due to having 0 toughness from combat damage, you would have 0 life from being hit by the creature, but would never gain life thus losing you the game. However, the creature was already exiled, but the lifegain was part of the replacement effect. So why does Arena not take into account the 2 life gained from the creature dying?

    Other people have explained this as you would lose the game, but be at 2 life from the lifegain. I believe this is also inaccurate because state-based actions such as “losing from 0 or less life” wouldn't apply, as the next time you regain priority, at the end of combat after damage is applied, you should still have 2 life, thus voiding that state-based action and continuing the game as normal.

    I believe [The Darkness Crystal] is coded wrong or the rulings around it are wrong. This applies to if a dying creature would gain you enough life to survive after being put to 0 life. An example would be an opponent's nontoken creature dying in combat but another creature hitting you down to 0 or -1. The question is would you survive at 1 or 2 life in this senario?

    (In this situation, for ease, all creatures are vanilla 2/2s) Currently Arena says the opponent's creature would be exiled due to having 0 toughness from combat damage, you would have… more

    2 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Gameplay  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating