560 results found

1. Multiple Triggered abilities stack order is not chose by player

   Wherever I play any ability which triggers in "Whenever you attach" and/or "Whenever this creature attacks" I can't chose the order I want to put them on the stack and so I can't use the correct combination of effects.

   It should be possibile to decide triggered abilities order as written in the rule book by APNAP:

   1.   Give us the steps to reproduce the bug:
       1.1 - play anything with mobilize and something that triggers whenevber a creature attacks         or a player attacks
       1.2 - attack
      

   2.   Note which platform you’re using (PC, Steam, Mac, Android, or iOS):
      - PC -> Steam  Ramo Steam beta:  Client stabile
      

      Version Steam: 1751405894
      Date build client Steam: sab 28 giu 4:07 UTC -08:00
      Date build Web Steam: mar 1 lug 23:19 UTC -08:00
      Version API Steam: SteamClient022->Windows 11 10.0.26100 buld 26100

   3.   Enter the actual results you’re experiencing:
      I lose games because of it. My mechacs and combinations would be much stronger. It results in hitting 2/3 damages and not gaining 2/3 life points per time so for any type of deck, especially aggro decks.
      

      I could be mythic right know with a non meta constructed deck. TY

   4.   Enter the expected results of the feature:
      

      To be FINALLY able to chose the order of multiple triggered abilities with APNAP rule

   5.   Add any relevant screenshots/videos
      

   6.   If you found a workaround, please add workaround steps:
      

   not to activate triggered abilities using a stack data structure constructed as permanents are put into the field (which I found is not the case), or do not push items in the stack using the cards coordinate (it seems to be the case - at least possible but not verified). Instead you should keep a stack data structured empty only for triggerd abilities - for each opponent - and when activating multiple triggered abilities, make the player choose the order with they want to push them into the stack.

   Wherever I play any ability which triggers in "Whenever you attach" and/or "Whenever this creature attacks" I can't chose the order I want to put them on the stack and so I can't use the correct combination of effects.

   It should be possibile to decide triggered abilities order as written in the rule book by APNAP:

   1.   Give us the steps to reproduce the bug:
       1.1 - play anything with mobilize and something that triggers whenevber a creature attacks         or a player attacks
       1.2 - attack
      

   2.   Note which platform you’re using (PC, Steam, Mac, Android, or iOS):
      - PC -> Steam

      … more
   2 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   1 comment  ·  Gameplay  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

2. Ashes of the Abhorrent did not stop Muldrotha's permanent spells ability

   I was playing a game where I had Ashes of the Abhorrent on the field and my opponent was playing a Brawl deck with Muldrotha, the Gravetide (as the alternate version "Orphan, Cocoon Fal'cie") as their commander. Ashes of the Abhorrent should have prevented my opponent from casting permanent spells from their graveyard using Muldrotha's ability, but once they played Muldrotha, their turn showed that they could cast the full range of permanents from their graveyard, and they used that to cast an enchantment from their graveyard that destroyed Ashes of the Abhorrent. No other effects on the field allowed them to pull that enchantment out of their graveyard. They were also playing lands from their graveyard, which Ashes of the Abhorrent would have had no effect on, so it could be possible that something got mixed up in the game's rulings that allowed both parts of the graveyard ability instead of just the one.

   I was playing a game where I had Ashes of the Abhorrent on the field and my opponent was playing a Brawl deck with Muldrotha, the Gravetide (as the alternate version "Orphan, Cocoon Fal'cie") as their commander. Ashes of the Abhorrent should have prevented my opponent from casting permanent spells from their graveyard using Muldrotha's ability, but once they played Muldrotha, their turn showed that they could cast the full range of permanents from their graveyard, and they used that to cast an enchantment from their graveyard that destroyed Ashes of the Abhorrent. No other effects on the field allowed… more

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Gameplay  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

3. Wrong Tarrian’s Soulcleaver interactions

   Hello, I’d like to report a bug with the “Tarrian’s Soulcleaver” card I keep running into in brawl. Anytime a token is sacrificed on my end the opponent is gaining the benefits of the card despite those tokens not going to graveyard. I’m not sure if there has been a rule change for tokens in the last year or so, so correct me if I’m wrong, but I’m pretty sure from what I remember tokens dying or being sacrificed do not enter the graveyard just like how “luminous broodmoth” doesn’t bring back token creatures when they die. I’ve been running into so many players abusing this card and the bug it’s having with game interactions when it comes to tokens. My last opponent was able to gain 16 +1/+1 counters from me sacrificing 16 treasure tokens despite those tokens not entering graveyard.

   Hello, I’d like to report a bug with the “Tarrian’s Soulcleaver” card I keep running into in brawl. Anytime a token is sacrificed on my end the opponent is gaining the benefits of the card despite those tokens not going to graveyard. I’m not sure if there has been a rule change for tokens in the last year or so, so correct me if I’m wrong, but I’m pretty sure from what I remember tokens dying or being sacrificed do not enter the graveyard just like how “luminous broodmoth” doesn’t bring back token creatures when they die. I’ve been running… more

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   1 comment  ·  Gameplay  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

4. Mauvaise Traduction de la Carte "Ange de l'heure sinitre"

   Bonjour, la traduction en français pour la carte "Ange de l'heure sinistre" indique "Quand cette créature arrive, si vous l'avez lancée depuis votre main, exilez tous les artéfacts." .

   Or, la bonne traduction est : "Quand cette créature arrive, si vous l'avez lancé depuis votre main, exilez toutes les créatures attaquantes." .

   Ce qui est un effet totalement différent et porte à confusion.

   La version anglaise de la carte affiche le bon texte et la bonne capacité.

   Merci d'avance pour la correction de cette erreur de traduction.

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

5. Spells with Spree Not Resolving When Part of the Spell Becomes Invalid

   This is a bug with the way spells with 'Spree' are being resolved. When multiple additional modes are selected, and at least one of the selected modes become invalid (target is dead, for example) while the spell is on the stack, ALL selected modes fail to resolve. This is not intended as the ruling for 'Spree' states that: If at least one target is still legal, the spell will resolve but will have no effect on any illegal targets.

   Steps to reproduce:
   - Cast 'Getaway Glamer', selecting both modes.
   - For the mode to exile a target non-token creature, target a creature
   - For the mode to destroy a target creature with the highest power, target any other creature with the highest power
   - Have the opponent kill the creature selected by the first mode with an instant spell, such as 'Shoot the Sheriff', while 'Getaway Glamer' is on the stack
   - The second mode of 'Getaway Glamer' does not take effect i.e., the creature selected with the highest power targeted does not get destroyed

   This is a bug with the way spells with 'Spree' are being resolved. When multiple additional modes are selected, and at least one of the selected modes become invalid (target is dead, for example) while the spell is on the stack, ALL selected modes fail to resolve. This is not intended as the ruling for 'Spree' states that: If at least one target is still legal, the spell will resolve but will have no effect on any illegal targets.

   Steps to reproduce:
   - Cast 'Getaway Glamer', selecting both modes.
   - For the mode to exile a target non-token creature, target… more

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Gameplay  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

6. Counter spell plus Card Milling is Stupid... It's a toxic form of play and Your stupid for Facilitating it....

   Counter spell plus Card Milling is Stupid... It's a toxic form of play and Your stupid for Facilitating it.... Same with Pure removal Decks... It's a style of play that exploits those who build combos with your cards and rewards those you gain pleasure from denying the opponent the ability to play the game.... You have FAR too many ways to remove cards than you do to protect them.... It's Garbage.... I only play the game cus its online... and I can quit whenever I want... I could NEVER sit across the table from an *** that plays this way without SLugging them before I left... Your a toxic bunch of FUckWits and I suggest you lend more power to Builders rather than people who get enjoyment out of denying the other person from even playing Your stupid game... Plus WHERE The **** are My Warhammer Cards!!!! Your so ******* Dumb You can't even coordinate your deck release.... How are we supposed to Believe this is connected to the physical game at all..... You Suck.... I hope Matt Mercer or someone creates a game that replaces you...

   Counter spell plus Card Milling is Stupid... It's a toxic form of play and Your stupid for Facilitating it.... Same with Pure removal Decks... It's a style of play that exploits those who build combos with your cards and rewards those you gain pleasure from denying the opponent the ability to play the game.... You have FAR too many ways to remove cards than you do to protect them.... It's Garbage.... I only play the game cus its online... and I can quit whenever I want... I could NEVER sit across the table from an *** that plays this way… more

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   1 comment  ·  Gameplay  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

7. Valkmira, Protector's Shield not responding correctly on cavalcade of calamity & torbran thane of red fel

   I ran into a game where my oponent had Valkmira, Protector's Shield on the board and I had a cavalcade of calamity on the board alongside: 1 grim initiate, 1 scorch spitter, 1 legion warboss and 1 torbran thane of red fell.
   So with 5 basic mountains untapped I declared my attack, that spawned a goblin token of the legion warboss his ability.
   Then I attacked with: grim initiate, scorch spitter and the goblin token. Doing so triggered the cavalcade of calamity's triggered ability and should bolt my oponent for 3 damage due to Torbran being on the board. Now the Valkima shield will protect 1 damage of that and then should ask me to pay 1 per source that's trageting him. Instead the Valkmira shield acts as damage absorber and soaks all damage from the cavalcade and doesn't even prompt me for paying the extra cost. On top of that he blocks my creatures and treats them as regular 1 damage sources as well. So as far as I can tell the interaction between these 3 cards isn't working as it would in real life. (Valkmira, Protector's Shield,cavalcade of calamity & torbran thane of red fel)

   I ran into a game where my oponent had Valkmira, Protector's Shield on the board and I had a cavalcade of calamity on the board alongside: 1 grim initiate, 1 scorch spitter, 1 legion warboss and 1 torbran thane of red fell.
   So with 5 basic mountains untapped I declared my attack, that spawned a goblin token of the legion warboss his ability.
   Then I attacked with: grim initiate, scorch spitter and the goblin token. Doing so triggered the cavalcade of calamity's triggered ability and should bolt my oponent for 3 damage due to Torbran being on the board. Now… more

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   1 comment  ·  Gameplay  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

8. Redirecting target of spells using "Return the Favor" didn't update the list of valid targets

   An opponent cast a spell (I don't remember the spell's name) to "Destroy target creature with power 4 or greater" targeting one of my Scorpion Dragon Tokens (made with Magda). I go to cast "Return the Favor" to redirect that spell into destroying one of my opponent's own fliers and protecting my scorpion at the same time (They have a 4/3 Flying Unicorn creature at least, I'm almost certain he had another creature of power 4 or greater as well). I pay for both effects, but I was unable to target my opponent's creatures with their own spell and timed out my decision, forcing the spell to kill both my Scorpion Dragons (instead of the original one token, or as I intended- two of their own creatures) losing me the game immediately after.

   What I think is happening is that under normal circumstances, spells of this nature don't consider the owners cards as valid targets out of the owner's best interest, so when a spell by the opponent (in this case: Me) is allowed to redirect it, the spell's list of 'Valid' targets does not update for the Opponent's best interest (including target's the spell's owner controls (Though really, true valid targets should be ownership agnostic. ALL Creatures with power greater than 4 are technically valid targets no matter whose side of the field they are on)).

   I sincerely hope this is fixed soon as this bug makes redirection spells into useless dead weight, or worse: a False Hope that backfires. PLEASE look into this.

   An opponent cast a spell (I don't remember the spell's name) to "Destroy target creature with power 4 or greater" targeting one of my Scorpion Dragon Tokens (made with Magda). I go to cast "Return the Favor" to redirect that spell into destroying one of my opponent's own fliers and protecting my scorpion at the same time (They have a 4/3 Flying Unicorn creature at least, I'm almost certain he had another creature of power 4 or greater as well). I pay for both effects, but I was unable to target my opponent's creatures with their own spell and timed… more

   •  

   2 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   2 comments  ·  Gameplay  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

9. "Show and Tell"

   Ok, the card "Show and Tell" and the ability to put a card into play with NO COST, is broken. I don't usually complain. Just play through it. But, in ALL of Magic's past, Any card that does something for free... much less InTo Play.. oh come on. Broken and abusable. Who came up with that card? Let me guess they came up with another 10 over powered "cool" cards. They don't "get it', the true game of Magic. If I am correct with my guess. sadly change their ways, or fired. Not the right fit for the job. NO COST to play an artifact or enchantment INTO PLAY, are you crazy... WHAT DID YOU THINK WAS GOING TO HAPPEN? bad sarcasm. No limiting casting cost? under or even to 3 mana, or Some sort of "restriction" on that card. Just off the top of my head stuff. Changing Waystone Guidance to One token instead of two.. Yes. I agree. Heartfire hero, was 0/1, now a 1/1.. I agree. Basic rule of Magic... like Fullmetal Alchemist... Law of equivalent exchange. The card played for free.. you should at least take the damage for the casting cost of the card coming into play. See, something off the top of my head.. not perfect.. but NOT FREE INTO PLAY.

   Ok, the card "Show and Tell" and the ability to put a card into play with NO COST, is broken. I don't usually complain. Just play through it. But, in ALL of Magic's past, Any card that does something for free... much less InTo Play.. oh come on. Broken and abusable. Who came up with that card? Let me guess they came up with another 10 over powered "cool" cards. They don't "get it', the true game of Magic. If I am correct with my guess. sadly change their ways, or fired. Not the right fit for the job. NO… more

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   1 comment  ·  Deck Building / Collection  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

10. Chat System Suggestion

    I love the game but really wish there was an option to chat with other players while in game. There is only the option to use one word at a time to talk to players. Wouldn't it be great if players had the option to chat with their opponents and not just their friends?

    I'm sure that there may have been a reason that this hasn't already been implemented. That said, I think a chat system would be a great addition that many people would enjoy. Additionally, there could be safeguards in place to protect users' information, prevent chatting while offline/not in a match (unless friends) and other potential issues.

    Players could have the option to toggle the chat on or off. If off, this could mean that the opponent would not have the ability to chat with the player. This would ensure that any players choosing not to participate in the chat function have no recourse for any potential legal pursuit.

    You could possibly create a poll within Arena, sent out by email, etc., asking players if they would like such a chat system implemented within Arena. This way, your player base could give feedback on what they want regarding the option to chat with other players while in a match.

    I'm sure you could even include the option to earn/buy emojis or backgrounds for the chat box, etc. There are so many possibilities!

    This was the only way I knew how to reach out to WotC, so I hope this reaches the right people!

    I love the game but really wish there was an option to chat with other players while in game. There is only the option to use one word at a time to talk to players. Wouldn't it be great if players had the option to chat with their opponents and not just their friends?

    I'm sure that there may have been a reason that this hasn't already been implemented. That said, I think a chat system would be a great addition that many people would enjoy. Additionally, there could be safeguards in place to protect users' information, prevent chatting while… more

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

11. Farewell to Farewell

    Can we do something about Farewell. It is gamebreaking. I can't tell you how many times I have lost a match to that single card. With people using mods and hacks to pull cards from their library it has become a problem. It is always some player that has 250 cards, and they always draw Farewell just in time to clear my board and start me from scratch. This is particularly terrible if you are using artifact or enchantment lands. There are only really niche ways to protect from this and most involve building a deck specific to that threat, which will do poorly for normal play. It doesn't target, so hexproof doesn't work, it exiles so indestructible doesn't work. You have to phase your board, exile/return at instant speed, or counterspell. Counterspell is the easiest but that means you are stuck playing blue of some sort. My point being is that it really seems to tip the game in favor of white and just having Farewell in your deck. It's bad enough on its own, but ALL the people who use cheats run this card. The Great Aurora is mythic and costs 9 mana to cast. Farewell is rare and costs 6, you get to choose what to exile, and it can affect creatures, artifacts, enchantments, graveyards, and any land that is any of those types. All other cards in Arena have some mana cap modifier, only effect one or two of those groups, cost much more, and/or require some prerequisite action to trigger. Urza's Ruinous Blast is the closest and it only affects nonlegendary, and nonlands, and doesn't exile your graveyard. It just feels bad to build up a board and have it wiped by a single 6 cost instant. Farewell isn't even multicolored like Ruinous Ultimatum. Which only destroys permanents instead of exiling them. Anyways that's my 2 cents. It's too strong, too easy to get out, and possess a problem for the enjoyability of the game in my opinion. Thanks, have a good day.

    Can we do something about Farewell. It is gamebreaking. I can't tell you how many times I have lost a match to that single card. With people using mods and hacks to pull cards from their library it has become a problem. It is always some player that has 250 cards, and they always draw Farewell just in time to clear my board and start me from scratch. This is particularly terrible if you are using artifact or enchantment lands. There are only really niche ways to protect from this and most involve building a deck specific to that threat,… more

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

12. Bug: Eriette's Tempting Apple removing copied enchantments

    Last game I think the enchantments on my creature got incorrectly removed, this happened when:

    On my side of the field I had:
    Yenna, Redtooth Regent (Enchanted with "Sheltered by Ghosts", Copy of "Lightwheel Enhancements")
    Predator Ooze (Enchanted with copy of "Sheltered by Ghosts", "Lightwheel Enhancements")

    Both sheltered by ghosts cards had an enemy creature exiled with it.

    When the enemy used "Eriette's Tempting Apple" on the Predator Ooze, at the same time as gaining control over my creature, it also decided to delete the copy of "Sheltered by Ghosts" that was attached to it.

    I don't see anywhere in the description of any of the cards involved that this is the interaction that should happen. The original card for "Lightwheel Enhancements" did not get discarded.

    As far as I can gather from the text in "Yenna, Redtooth Regent"'s ability description, the copy should not disappear if I lose control over the creature it's attached to.

    Last game I think the enchantments on my creature got incorrectly removed, this happened when:

    On my side of the field I had:
    Yenna, Redtooth Regent (Enchanted with "Sheltered by Ghosts", Copy of "Lightwheel Enhancements")
    Predator Ooze (Enchanted with copy of "Sheltered by Ghosts", "Lightwheel Enhancements")

    Both sheltered by ghosts cards had an enemy creature exiled with it.

    When the enemy used "Eriette's Tempting Apple" on the Predator Ooze, at the same time as gaining control over my creature, it also decided to delete the copy of "Sheltered by Ghosts" that was attached to it.

    I don't see anywhere in… more

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Gameplay  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

13. Nia, Skysail Storyteller

    In my game of Powered Cube, my opponent played a Nia, Skysail Storyteller. I bounced her with my Teferi, Time Raveler. In a later turn, when he cast it from his hand, it entered the battlefield as Nia, Fabled Skyclimber, when there was absolutely no reason for that to happen and I went on to lose the game

    2 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Gameplay  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

14. two factor authentication

    the simplest way to protect your account and also maintain it is to allow the option of two factor authentication

    would be helpful to add a second email or phone number for authentication for safety but also so i don't have to have a two week conversation with customer service to alter my email.

    as an option you could allow us to add our phone number or another email so we don't end up loosing the account if we delete associated or other issues related to emails.

    customer service seems to not have the ability to deal with this issue very well without me having to pay money in order for me to save my 7 year old account to prove its my account which i would consider extortion, that's actually extortion not something i consider that's actually extortion.

    i spent two weeks stressed out, angry having trouble sleeping knowing i might not be able to deal with this issue and today there was an expected update where i had to confirm my age and so i just bought product so i wouldnt end up loosing my account which is insane and should never be allowed, if i ever felt your company isnt willing to do anything for a dollar, but i always felt that way but this isnt gabling this is extortion i either pay money and show a receipt of payment or i don't get to use my account after September 2nd.

    7 years 4+ hours a day, just add it up what do you think my times worth, do you think there are people who would be willing to cause the kind of problem that is impossible to take back over the kind of investment you make people put in then take it away from them. i had a friend who did 8 years in prison for vehicular manslughter cause he flipped out over some dude yelling at him on the sidewalk and had his girl send him sheets of magic cards printed off on paper and they glued them to playing cards so they could play this game. some people are suicidal, some have personality disorders, some are delusional or drug addicts, you should not be putting people in this kind of situation, what if they went snapped and did something terrible to someone close to them, or a stranger, or themselves, not everyone has money to spend on this game, but that shouldnt mean they cant keep there account.

    bellow is a file that shows the copy paste response to every message i sent that proved over and over that the account was mine including video footage showing me in the game with my steam account and personal info, until i bought a product to prove that it was my account.

    you should 100% discuss the option for people to add 2 factor authentication and take it extremely seriously and do it as quickly as possible since your actually going to start the process of not allowing people to sign in who cant access there wizards account to prove they are of age.

    the simplest way to protect your account and also maintain it is to allow the option of two factor authentication

    would be helpful to add a second email or phone number for authentication for safety but also so i don't have to have a two week conversation with customer service to alter my email.

    as an option you could allow us to add our phone number or another email so we don't end up loosing the account if we delete associated or other issues related to emails.

    customer service seems to not have the ability to deal with this issue… more

    •  

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

15. Summoner's Grimoire bug

    My second lost of my last premier draft occured because the game wouldn't let me summon Summoner's Grimoire.

    I had the mana availabe and was in my main phase. I was trying to drag it as usual into play but it kept just showing me the text, wouldn't let me play it. It was letting me play other cards in my hand but not that one. I tried moving it to a different position in my hand and it would let me do that but not summon it. Eventually I ran out of time so the game moved to combat phase. In my second main I magaed to play it by double clicking on it but it was too late. Hopefully you will see the issue in the Log I captured as soon as the game finished. I also made of video if you need to see it. I checked the playfield after the game (which only lasted one more turn) to make sure I wasn't missing anything, I'm 99% sure it was a bug.

    My second lost of my last premier draft occured because the game wouldn't let me summon Summoner's Grimoire.

    I had the mana availabe and was in my main phase. I was trying to drag it as usual into play but it kept just showing me the text, wouldn't let me play it. It was letting me play other cards in my hand but not that one. I tried moving it to a different position in my hand and it would let me do that but not summon it. Eventually I ran out of time so the game moved to… more

    2 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Gameplay  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

16. Thunder Salvo Bug

    In the match I just left to create this ticket, I tried to kill a cat token with Thunder Salvo, but nothing happened. There were zero protections on the token, and the visual effect was lightning, not a fireball (I think a fireball is the normal effect).

    2 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Gameplay  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

17. Orim's Chant Bug

    Was just playing Arena, I played a Battle of Bywater against an opponent, they played Orim's Chant and it meant that Battle of Bywater didn't resolve even though in the rulings of Orim's Chant it specifically says “Orim's Chant won't affect spells that your opponents cast before you cast Orim's Chant, including any spells that are still on the stack. Orim's Chant also won't stop your opponents from casting spells after you cast Orim's Chant but before Orim's Chant resolves.”

    2 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Gameplay  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

18. Cast Reanimate on my Grist in the graveyard, it returned my opponent's Questing Beast to the battlefield

    I cast Reanimate, it pulls up the Your Graveyard/Opponent's Graveyard options, with the default view to my graveyard. The only option in my graveyard is Grist, which I select, as it's a creature while it's in my graveyard. The spell resolves, and returns my opponent's Questing Beast to the battlefield.

    This was especially bad because I had earlier in the turn just Unburial Rites to return my own Questing Beast to the battlefield, forcing me to sacrifice one to the legend rule, and lose 4 life instead of 3, and was no longer able to answer my opponent's Elder Gargaroth token by using Grist, as I should have had a round of priority to activate Grist to sacrifice my Questing Beast using the -2 ability. Instead, when my opponent received priority after I sac'd my second Questing Beast to the legend rule and proceeded to end the turn, he removed it with Parallax Wave, ending the game for me.

    I can't say I wouldn't have still lost if it played out correctly, but I certainly had no chance when it played out as it did.

    I cast Reanimate, it pulls up the Your Graveyard/Opponent's Graveyard options, with the default view to my graveyard. The only option in my graveyard is Grist, which I select, as it's a creature while it's in my graveyard. The spell resolves, and returns my opponent's Questing Beast to the battlefield.

    This was especially bad because I had earlier in the turn just Unburial Rites to return my own Questing Beast to the battlefield, forcing me to sacrifice one to the legend rule, and lose 4 life instead of 3, and was no longer able to answer my opponent's Elder Gargaroth… more

    2 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Gameplay  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

19. Bug when copying Legendary creature

    I copied my opponent's Legendary creature with Naga Flescrafter in order to destroy my opponent's Legendary creature. However nothing happened? There can only be one unique Legendary in play right? And if not, then why, as it is a Legendary creature and should allow only one unique instance of that card. OK, I now read the legendary rule and it allows for two same Legendary creatures to exist on both players, which is very strange and should be changed in my opinion. A legendary is a legendary, and by copying it it allows the strategy to remove opponent's legendaries, which makes the game more interesting. Cheers 🙏

    I copied my opponent's Legendary creature with Naga Flescrafter in order to destroy my opponent's Legendary creature. However nothing happened? There can only be one unique Legendary in play right? And if not, then why, as it is a Legendary creature and should allow only one unique instance of that card. OK, I now read the legendary rule and it allows for two same Legendary creatures to exist on both players, which is very strange and should be changed in my opinion. A legendary is a legendary, and by copying it it allows the strategy to remove opponent's legendaries, which… more

    •  

    •  

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Gameplay  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

20. Overwhelming Splendor - Not Stopping Creature ETB's

    I dont have a screenshot and its difficult reproduce in the wild, but, I just had a game where I had Overwhelming Splendor on the battlefield and the opponet cast Craterhoof Behemoth and the enter the battlefield trigger still went on the stack and resolved. This should not be the case. Per the ruling on Overwhelming Splendor:

    (9/29/2017)
    If a creature enters the battlefield under enchanted player's control, any "when [this creature] enters the battlefield" abilities of that creature won't trigger. Any "as [this creature] enters the battlefield" or "[this creature] enters the battlefield with" abilities won't be applied.

    To recreate, just have a game where Overwhelming Splendor is in play and see that the client is not preventing enter the battlefield effects from triggering. Thank you!

    I dont have a screenshot and its difficult reproduce in the wild, but, I just had a game where I had Overwhelming Splendor on the battlefield and the opponet cast Craterhoof Behemoth and the enter the battlefield trigger still went on the stack and resolved. This should not be the case. Per the ruling on Overwhelming Splendor:

    (9/29/2017)
    If a creature enters the battlefield under enchanted player's control, any "when [this creature] enters the battlefield" abilities of that creature won't trigger. Any "as [this creature] enters the battlefield" or "[this creature] enters the battlefield with" abilities won't be applied.

    To… more

    0 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Gameplay  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating