2857 results found

1. Abnormal copy of "Echocasting Symposium"

   At my arena limited draft match-up my opponent casted Echocasting Symposium. For some reason, at turn 5 he got a double copy of a creature(?) this led to me losing the game.

   OP had 1 hp after I had attacked him.

   ??? Could I get redeemed from this loss lol

   • 

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   1 comment  ·  Gameplay  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

2. Ability triggering in Card without abilities

   A creature (Sephiroth, Fabled SOLDIER, as its own trasformation, Sephiroth, One-Winged Angel) transformed into a Land without any abilities by the enchantment of Imprisioned in the Moon, had it's abilities triggering normally.

   (this is the f**king 3rd time I had to rewrite and reupload all the files attached, this website experience is disgusting, even most if considering we are here voluntarily to help a profit company)

   •  

   •  

   •  

   •  

   • 

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   1 comment  ·  Gameplay  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

3. Blockers

   Couldnt choose blockers un quick draft today un strixhaven. Game was running ok, but i just couldnt click in My creatures to.assign them and i Lost due to this issue.

   2 votes

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Events  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

4. Day of Black Sun - Card didn't work as expected

   When playing this card and it says that the creatures lose all abilities, why don't they then lose "all abilities?"

   "Each creature with mana value X or less loses all abilities until end of turn. Destroy those creatures."

   I played this against an earthbend deck. They had 2 lands, that were also creatures with the ability to return if they died or were exiled. Because it's abilities were" lost "shouldn't killing those creatures negated the ability for them to return? If not, why not?

   •  

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   1 comment  ·  Gameplay  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

5. ジェスカイの啓示のバグ

   スタンダードでジェスカイの啓示を使用時、呪文を対象にしようとしたが対象に取れなかった。iOS版です。

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Gameplay  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

6. Did not get packs for lvl 24 mastery rewards with Marvel.

   I did not get my level 24 mastery rewards of 3 marvel packs (I have the mastery pass and the reward was 1 and 2 packs). I did see the screen that said I got them then when I hit claim and went to my packs section to open them the game says that I do not have any packs to open.

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Deck Building / Collection  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

7. MMR is overriding deck power too heavily in Brawl matchmaking

   I am also submitting feedback that MMR appears to be weighted too heavily compared to actual deck power in Brawl matchmaking.

   The current system seems to punish players for winning games with casual or fun decks. A deck may start out receiving appropriate matchups based on its actual power level, but after winning some games, the matchmaking appears to push that deck into queues against highly optimized lists, tutor-heavy decks, ramp shells, control shells, stax pieces, and combo engines that are far beyond the deck’s intended power level.

   This creates a frustrating experience because a casual deck that is capable of winning some games is not the same thing as an optimized high-power deck. Winning with a lower-powered or more casual deck should not cause the player to be repeatedly matched against decks with much higher consistency, stronger card quality, more tutors, more ramp, or more oppressive game plans.

   Brawl matchmaking should prioritize deck construction and actual deck power more heavily than player MMR. MMR may be useful as one factor, but it should not override deck-strength weighting to the point that a casual deck is effectively punished for performing well.

   Please review whether Brawl matchmaking is placing too much emphasis on MMR relative to deck power. The system should distinguish between a truly optimized deck and a casual deck that happens to win games through normal gameplay.

   I am also submitting feedback that MMR appears to be weighted too heavily compared to actual deck power in Brawl matchmaking.

   The current system seems to punish players for winning games with casual or fun decks. A deck may start out receiving appropriate matchups based on its actual power level, but after winning some games, the matchmaking appears to push that deck into queues against highly optimized lists, tutor-heavy decks, ramp shells, control shells, stax pieces, and combo engines that are far beyond the deck’s intended power level.

   This creates a frustrating experience because a casual deck that is capable… more

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

8. Winter Orb should be banned from Brawl

   I am also submitting feedback that Winter Orb should be banned from Brawl.

   Winter Orb creates an extremely unhealthy play pattern in a casual singleton format. The card does not create interesting gameplay or meaningful back-and-forth interaction. Instead, it prevents players from actually playing the game by locking down mana development and dragging matches into repetitive, frustrating board states.

   This is especially problematic in Brawl because players always have access to a commander, and certain decks can build around Winter Orb far more effectively than the opponent can reasonably prepare for in best-of-one matchmaking. Decks that abuse Winter Orb can use mana rocks, cheap commanders, untap effects, or asymmetrical board states to continue progressing while the opposing player is effectively locked out.

   Even when Winter Orb does not immediately win the game, it creates the kind of non-game experience that should not be encouraged in Brawl. A card that primarily functions to deny resources and prevent normal gameplay is a poor fit for the format, especially when matchmaking can pair it against casual or lower-powered decks that are not built to handle prison/stax strategies.

   Please review Winter Orb’s legality in Brawl. I believe it should be banned because it promotes unfun, non-interactive gameplay and creates matchups where one player is prevented from meaningfully participating.

   I am also submitting feedback that Winter Orb should be banned from Brawl.

   Winter Orb creates an extremely unhealthy play pattern in a casual singleton format. The card does not create interesting gameplay or meaningful back-and-forth interaction. Instead, it prevents players from actually playing the game by locking down mana development and dragging matches into repetitive, frustrating board states.

   This is especially problematic in Brawl because players always have access to a commander, and certain decks can build around Winter Orb far more effectively than the opponent can reasonably prepare for in best-of-one matchmaking. Decks that abuse Winter Orb can… more

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

9. Paradox Engine should be banned or heavily reweighted in Brawl matchmaking

   I am also submitting feedback that Paradox Engine should either be banned in Brawl or weighted much more heavily in matchmaking.

   Paradox Engine creates the exact type of gameplay that Brawl matchmaking should be trying to prevent: repetitive, non-interactive turns where one player chains mana rocks, spells, activated abilities, and commander synergies until the game effectively ends. Even when it does not win immediately, it often creates a board state where the opposing player is forced to sit through an extended sequence with little or no meaningful interaction.

   This card is especially problematic in Brawl because commander access and singleton deck construction make certain engines much easier to build around than they may appear from card weighting alone. In practice, Paradox Engine is not just a strong value card. It is a combo engine that can turn ordinary mana rocks and utility creatures into explosive, game-ending sequences.

   If Paradox Engine is going to remain legal, it should be treated as a major power-level indicator in matchmaking. Decks running Paradox Engine should be weighted significantly higher and matched primarily against other high-powered or combo-oriented decks. It should not be allowed to appear in matchups against casual, lower-consistency, or non-combo Brawl decks as if it were a normal artifact value card.

   Please review Paradox Engine’s legality and matchmaking weight in Brawl. I believe it is either ban-worthy or currently underweighted relative to its actual impact on games.

   I am also submitting feedback that Paradox Engine should either be banned in Brawl or weighted much more heavily in matchmaking.

   Paradox Engine creates the exact type of gameplay that Brawl matchmaking should be trying to prevent: repetitive, non-interactive turns where one player chains mana rocks, spells, activated abilities, and commander synergies until the game effectively ends. Even when it does not win immediately, it often creates a board state where the opposing player is forced to sit through an extended sequence with little or no meaningful interaction.

   This card is especially problematic in Brawl because commander access and singleton… more

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

10. Optimized control shells are underweighted in Brawl matchmaking, especially Azorius

    I believe this issue may apply to multiple color combinations, but Azorius control appears to be one of the worst offenders.

    Many players are able to build highly optimized control shells around seemingly random or less threatening blue-white commanders. In these cases, the commander itself may not appear especially powerful, but the actual deck is still a best-version control list built around efficient counterspells, board wipes, premium removal, card draw, planeswalkers, and inevitability.

    This creates a serious matchmaking issue because the deck may be underweighted based on the commander, while the actual 99-card construction is far stronger than the commander suggests. In practice, the commander is often secondary. The real power comes from the density of control tools and the ability to prevent the opposing deck from meaningfully playing the game.

    Brawl matchmaking should account more heavily for optimized archetype density, not just commander identity. Decks running a high concentration of premium counterspells, sweepers, removal, and card advantage should be treated as high-powered control decks regardless of whether the commander appears casual, unusual, or low-priority.

    Please review how optimized control shells are weighted in Brawl matchmaking, especially Azorius decks using less obvious commanders to access the strongest blue-white control packages.

    I believe this issue may apply to multiple color combinations, but Azorius control appears to be one of the worst offenders.

    Many players are able to build highly optimized control shells around seemingly random or less threatening blue-white commanders. In these cases, the commander itself may not appear especially powerful, but the actual deck is still a best-version control list built around efficient counterspells, board wipes, premium removal, card draw, planeswalkers, and inevitability.

    This creates a serious matchmaking issue because the deck may be underweighted based on the commander, while the actual 99-card construction is far stronger than the commander… more

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

11. Simic and green ramp decks appear underweighted in Brawl matchmaking

    Dear MTG Arena Support Team,

    I am writing to submit feedback regarding Brawl matchmaking and deck weighting, specifically concerning Simic and green-based ramp decks.

    In my experience, Simic and green ramp strategies appear to be significantly underweighted in Brawl matchmaking. These decks are often matched against much lower-powered or slower decks despite having access to explosive mana acceleration, consistent card advantage, oversized threats, and the ability to quickly outpace normal gameplay.

    Green ramp has an outsized impact in Brawl because the format is singleton and games often revolve around tempo, commander access, and resource development. A deck that can consistently accelerate ahead by multiple turns is not playing on the same axis as decks that are developing at a normal rate. This becomes especially problematic when those ramp decks also have access to blue interaction, card draw, bounce, counterspells, or value engines.

    Simic decks in particular can combine green’s mana acceleration with blue’s ability to protect threats, draw cards, and disrupt opponents. This creates matchups where the ramp deck is able to build an overwhelming board or cast high-impact spells far earlier than the opposing deck can reasonably respond.

    Please review how Brawl matchmaking weights green ramp decks, especially Simic commanders and decks running heavy mana acceleration. Ramp density, early-game mana production, land acceleration, and the ability to consistently jump ahead on mana should be weighted more heavily when determining deck strength.

    These decks should be matched more frequently against other high-powered Brawl decks rather than slower, casual, or lower-consistency decks that cannot realistically keep pace with repeated early ramp.

    Thank you for your time and consideration.

    Dear MTG Arena Support Team,

    I am writing to submit feedback regarding Brawl matchmaking and deck weighting, specifically concerning Simic and green-based ramp decks.

    In my experience, Simic and green ramp strategies appear to be significantly underweighted in Brawl matchmaking. These decks are often matched against much lower-powered or slower decks despite having access to explosive mana acceleration, consistent card advantage, oversized threats, and the ability to quickly outpace normal gameplay.

    Green ramp has an outsized impact in Brawl because the format is singleton and games often revolve around tempo, commander access, and resource development. A deck that can consistently… more

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

12. Tutor-heavy Brawl decks appear incorrectly weighted in matchmaking

    Dear MTG Arena Support Team,

    I am writing to submit feedback regarding Brawl matchmaking and deck weighting, specifically concerning decks that run multiple tutor effects.

    In my experience, Brawl decks with access to repeated or highly efficient tutors appear to be under-weighted by the matchmaking system. These decks are often able to consistently find their strongest cards, combo pieces, removal, or win conditions, which makes them significantly more powerful and reliable than decks without similar access to tutors.

    Because Brawl is a singleton format, tutors have an outsized impact on gameplay. They reduce the natural variance of the format and allow certain decks to play much more consistently than their apparent commander or card pool strength would suggest. When these decks are matched against lower-powered or more casual Brawl decks, the games often feel lopsided and unfair.

    I believe the matchmaking system should place greater weight on decks that include multiple tutor effects, especially low-cost or repeatable tutors, and decks where tutors directly enable combos or highly consistent win conditions. These decks should be matched more frequently against other high-powered Brawl decks rather than lower-powered commanders.

    Please review how tutor-heavy Brawl decks are currently weighted in matchmaking and consider adjusting their matchmaking value to better reflect their actual in-game power level.

    Thank you for your time and consideration.

    Dear MTG Arena Support Team,

    I am writing to submit feedback regarding Brawl matchmaking and deck weighting, specifically concerning decks that run multiple tutor effects.

    In my experience, Brawl decks with access to repeated or highly efficient tutors appear to be under-weighted by the matchmaking system. These decks are often able to consistently find their strongest cards, combo pieces, removal, or win conditions, which makes them significantly more powerful and reliable than decks without similar access to tutors.

    Because Brawl is a singleton format, tutors have an outsized impact on gameplay. They reduce the natural variance of the format and… more

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

13. Hei Bai appears incorrectly weighted in Brawl matchmaking

    Dear MTG Arena Support Team,

    I am writing to submit a formal complaint regarding the current matchmaking placement of Hei Bai in Brawl.

    Based on its power level, consistency, and impact on games, Hei Bai appears to be significantly stronger than the commanders it is currently being matched against. In my experience, it is frequently being paired into lower-powered Brawl queues where the matchup feels inappropriate and heavily unbalanced. This creates a frustrating play experience, as the deck’s strength seems much closer to commanders that are typically placed in the so-called “**** Queue.”

    I believe Hei Bai is currently being under-weighted by the matchmaking system and should be reviewed for placement into a higher matchmaking tier. At minimum, its matchmaking weight should be adjusted so that it is more consistently paired against commanders of comparable strength.

    Please review Hei Bai’s current Brawl matchmaking classification and consider whether it should be moved into **** Queue or otherwise weighted more heavily to prevent unfair matchups against lower-powered commanders.

    Thank you for your time and consideration.

    Dear MTG Arena Support Team,

    I am writing to submit a formal complaint regarding the current matchmaking placement of Hei Bai in Brawl.

    Based on its power level, consistency, and impact on games, Hei Bai appears to be significantly stronger than the commanders it is currently being matched against. In my experience, it is frequently being paired into lower-powered Brawl queues where the matchup feels inappropriate and heavily unbalanced. This creates a frustrating play experience, as the deck’s strength seems much closer to commanders that are typically placed in the so-called “**** Queue.”

    I believe Hei Bai is currently being… more

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

14. Search for Type:"Rat" brings up Pirates and Rats

    the Search for T:"rat" brings up pirates

    I do like me some rat pirates

    •  

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Deck Building / Collection  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

15. Jump Into Marvel Super Heroes Stole my Gold

    I started a Jump Into marvel Super Heroes event today (July 8) and selected two packets, Young Avengers then Boosted. After selecting the second pack, it pushed my bak to the event main screen with the optio nto "Choose Packets". I clicked on that. It took me to a screen that highlighted Young Avengers, but didn't show any other packs and the "Confirm Pick" button was grayed out.

    •  

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Events  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

16. Jump into marvel stuck

    On IPad, after selecting both packs I was sent back to Home Screen. Going back into the event, I see ‘Select Packs” but no packs to select

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Events  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

17. PC jump in marvel mtga

    MTGA Marvel Jump In cannot select 2nd pack bug and stuck

    •  

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  User Interface  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

18. Jump in marvel

    When you play the jump in for marvel superheros, if you select 2 of the same color for packs. I.e. Young avengers (red) and Thor (red) it will freeze and lock you out until you restart the game. Then you can reselect your pack but the second one MUST be a different color. This needs to be fixed.

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  User Interface  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

19. Mythic Champion Achievement Impossible for F2P Players

    The achievement "Mythic Champion" is basically impossible to get if you are a F2P player. You can get Mythic in Ranked relatively easily with enough grinding. Getting Mythic in Limited is basically impossible without spending an absurd amount of real money into the game due to the RNG of limited games. You have a couple streaks of bad drafts where you don't get good pulls and there goes your chances of getting Mythic. It's not like Ranked where, when the RNG hits you the wrong way, you can just keep playing to dig yourself out if the hole. I think that achievement needs to be reworked somehow with F2P players in mind.

    The achievement "Mythic Champion" is basically impossible to get if you are a F2P player. You can get Mythic in Ranked relatively easily with enough grinding. Getting Mythic in Limited is basically impossible without spending an absurd amount of real money into the game due to the RNG of limited games. You have a couple streaks of bad drafts where you don't get good pulls and there goes your chances of getting Mythic. It's not like Ranked where, when the RNG hits you the wrong way, you can just keep playing to dig yourself out if the hole. I think… more

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Gameplay  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

20. Why doesn´t display my bônus card creation?

    Why doesn´t display my bônus card creation?

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Deck Building / Collection  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating