174 results found

1. Invasion of Tarkir dealt more damage than it should have

   I was playing a match in Historic Ranked. On the previous turn, the opponent had played Invasion of Tarkir, revealed a dragon card, and destroyed my creature with 3 damage. Fine. On the next turn I played a 4/4 creature. Opponent then played another Invasion of Tarkir, revealed ONE dragon card, but my creature was dealt 4 damage instead of 3, killing it. ONLY ONE CARD WAS REVEALED. The value of X is the number of cards revealed during that spell resolution NOT THE TOTAL number of cards revealed on all turns. There is a bug in the way the damage is being calculated, due to the fact that another card was revealed by a spell with the same name on the previous turn. This player is obviously EXPLOITING this bug because why else would you play a card that dealt 3 damage to a 4 toughness creature? They should banned. I conceded and took a loss in ranked because I'm not going to play against a bugged mechanic when the player is knowingly exploiting it.

   I was playing a match in Historic Ranked. On the previous turn, the opponent had played Invasion of Tarkir, revealed a dragon card, and destroyed my creature with 3 damage. Fine. On the next turn I played a 4/4 creature. Opponent then played another Invasion of Tarkir, revealed ONE dragon card, but my creature was dealt 4 damage instead of 3, killing it. ONLY ONE CARD WAS REVEALED. The value of X is the number of cards revealed during that spell resolution NOT THE TOTAL number of cards revealed on all turns. There is a bug in the way the… more

   •  

   • 

   0 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   1 comment  ·  Gameplay  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

2. Dragon's Approach/Tybalts Trickery Interaction

   PC MTGA Bug.
   Midweek Magic Event Cascade Historic Brawl.

   The opponent player used one or both of these cards to play a 12/12 Eldrazi.

   Unless I misunderstood a rule interaction, I cannot see how they have been able to form this feat without abusing a bug.

   •  

   •  

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Gameplay  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

3. BUG: Eusocial engineering creates twice the amount of tokens

   Eusocial engineering creates twice the amount of tokens and I don't see why since my opponent didn't had any cards that made that possible.

   • 

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Gameplay  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

4. Sidisi, Regent of the Mire

   Sidisi from the new Dragons set is unfunctional. It cost me two games in the last round of a traditional draft, not only making me go negative EV when perfectly possible to win those games if the card functioned correctly. You are unable to sacrifice your creature to return anything at any mana cost. To be honest, I would like a refund of gems, when paying real world money for something, where there are prizes on the line and then only one side of a game is functional is very disappointing.

   •  

   •  

   5 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   3 comments  ·  Gameplay  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

5. Multiple copy cards not working on Brawl

   1.   Build a brawl deck with multiples of any of the "any number of cards" choices (hare apparent, dragon's approach) 
      

   2.   PC
      

   3.  Deck not considered usable by client
      

   4.   Deck should be usable by client
      

   Noted only after the last update to the client for EoE update

   •  

   •  

   4 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Deck Building / Collection  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

6. Koh, the Face Stealer - Card not acting as a Shapeshifter

   Koh, the Face Stealer - Card not acting as a Shapeshifter. The card is not putting an (ALL) next to its shapeshifter creature type when in game play. It should act like other Shapeshifters, being able to use Type Bonuses, but it currently is not.

   Example would be having Corroding Dragonstorm in play, and playing Koh, and the card triggering because a shapeshifter would count as a Dragon Type, and the card should return to players hand.

   0 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   1 comment  ·  Gameplay  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

7. speed sound effect not working

   The sound effect for increasing speed cuts out after the initial rev sound. There's no more "ding" sound. The Start Your Engines sound effect is the same, but the subsequent increases are cut short.

   5 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Gameplay  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

8. Issue with cards that have "A deck can have any number of cards named *blank*"

   This last update has broken all my brawl decks with Hare Apparent, Dragon's Approach, s l i m e(because its censored without the spaces for some reason) Against Humanity, and Rat Colony, stating that "This deck contains too many copies of a card" despite the fact that it is their entire gimmick.

   4 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Deck Building / Collection  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

9. Unexpected Draw with time still on the clock

   I play a vadrok combo deck, and some turns can take awhile with many spells cast. Sometimes this creates a large stack that needs to resolve after I play or re-play show of confidence. The problem is, the game will sometimes force a draw when I still have time on my rope.
   In this screenshot, all but one dragon was played in one turn. This was just the start of my second rope. I still probably had ~25 seconds to swing and end the turn. The game forced a draw in the middle of resolving the stack instead.

   The only workaround I've found is just to limit my turns significantly, which isn't a problem most of the time once I get the combo rolling, but in some games with large board states on both sides it's an issue while I try to unsummon or kill the board state so I can swing.

   I play a vadrok combo deck, and some turns can take awhile with many spells cast. Sometimes this creates a large stack that needs to resolve after I play or re-play show of confidence. The problem is, the game will sometimes force a draw when I still have time on my rope.
   In this screenshot, all but one dragon was played in one turn. This was just the start of my second rope. I still probably had ~25 seconds to swing and end the turn. The game forced a draw in the middle of resolving the stack instead.

   The only… more

   •  

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   2 comments  ·  Gameplay  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

10. Goblin Engineer appears to have some bugged use cases

    Goblin Engineer appears to have some bugged use cases.

    Situation: I had a Blossoming Tortoise (a Hangarback Walker with one +1/+1 counter on it, equipped with an Assimilation Aegis that was currently exiling a Blossoming Tortoise) and was in the beginning of combat step. My opponent activated the "destroy target artifact" ability of their Cankerbloom targeting the Assimilation Aegis. In response, I attempted to activate my Goblin Engineer to sacrifice the Aegis, targeting a Masterpiece Vault in my graveyard. When I got to the step where I could choose which artifact I wished to sacrifice, it brought me to that "these permanents are stacked on top of each other, so choose one" disambiguation screen. There it appeared the Assimilation Aegis was highlighted, but the only button showing was "Done," and I was unable to submit it as the artifact I wished to sacrifice. I clicked done and it brought me back to the "choose which artifact to sacrifice" step. I tried several times to perform the action, clicking on the Aegis, clicking on the Tortoise, but nothing changed, and the "Done" button always booted me back to the previous step in the process. I was unable to submit the Aegis as the artifact I wished to sacrifice.

    Expectation: I would expect to have been able to sacrifice the Aegis during this timing window. There were no other permanents or effects restricting my ability to do so. After the Aegis was destroyed I was able to activate my Goblin Engineer as normal and everything functioned correctly.

    I'm using a Mac.

    Goblin Engineer appears to have some bugged use cases.

    Situation: I had a Blossoming Tortoise (a Hangarback Walker with one +1/+1 counter on it, equipped with an Assimilation Aegis that was currently exiling a Blossoming Tortoise) and was in the beginning of combat step. My opponent activated the "destroy target artifact" ability of their Cankerbloom targeting the Assimilation Aegis. In response, I attempted to activate my Goblin Engineer to sacrifice the Aegis, targeting a Masterpiece Vault in my graveyard. When I got to the step where I could choose which artifact I wished to sacrifice, it brought me… more

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Gameplay  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

11. Ban Doc Aurlock in Standard (or at least BO1)

    This enablement with airbending leads to extremely lengthy turns with no win condition in sight as a player often times slowly assembles a stack of 1/1 tokens and eventually passes the turn or worse (exploit/glitch?) causes their opponent to timeout and lose the ability to react. The latter occurs if the opponent has a response that they must continuously acknowledge. The airbending player never seems to time out and can perform the loop as frequently as they wish while causing their opponent to timeout (certain circumstances). This playloop is reminiscent of copycat in Kaladesh Standard or in more recent times the Nexus of Fate loop from Dominaria/WAR. The nature of Arena makes these sorts of interactions very painful, especially in BO1 play where a player can't even sideboard against it. These decks are an increasing amount of the meta and lead to very long drawn out non games with the primary wincons being scoop to boredom, timeout exploit, or the opponent simply dying of old age. An emergency ban is needed, at least on Arena where the nature of the game engine itself makes it excruciating vs simply demonstrating a loop in paper.

    This enablement with airbending leads to extremely lengthy turns with no win condition in sight as a player often times slowly assembles a stack of 1/1 tokens and eventually passes the turn or worse (exploit/glitch?) causes their opponent to timeout and lose the ability to react. The latter occurs if the opponent has a response that they must continuously acknowledge. The airbending player never seems to time out and can perform the loop as frequently as they wish while causing their opponent to timeout (certain circumstances). This playloop is reminiscent of copycat in Kaladesh Standard or in more recent times… more

    2 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Gameplay  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

12. GreError with 249 tokens

    I had a game end in a GreError draw due to 249 Scute Swarm tokens, with Ashaya, Blossoming Tortoise, and some earthbent Forests.

    For some weird reason, it hung on the Blossoming Tortoise attack trigger, even though that has nothing to do with the tokens?
    (It's a mill/graveyard/return land action, which would have created more tokens, but never got the chance.)

    249 tokens seems like a reasonable number, so maybe it was the 6 +1/+1 counters on each of them?
    There's got to be a way to efficiently store that many tokens and counters, the game engine should be able to handle it.
    Also, when there's lots of triggers of the same kind, make them resolve faster, it's not like there's anything special about each one.

    I had a game end in a GreError draw due to 249 Scute Swarm tokens, with Ashaya, Blossoming Tortoise, and some earthbent Forests.

    For some weird reason, it hung on the Blossoming Tortoise attack trigger, even though that has nothing to do with the tokens?
    (It's a mill/graveyard/return land action, which would have created more tokens, but never got the chance.)

    249 tokens seems like a reasonable number, so maybe it was the 6 +1/+1 counters on each of them?
    There's got to be a way to efficiently store that many tokens and counters, the game engine should be able… more

    •  

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  Gameplay  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

13. Redirecting target of spells using "Return the Favor" didn't update the list of valid targets

    An opponent cast a spell (I don't remember the spell's name) to "Destroy target creature with power 4 or greater" targeting one of my Scorpion Dragon Tokens (made with Magda). I go to cast "Return the Favor" to redirect that spell into destroying one of my opponent's own fliers and protecting my scorpion at the same time (They have a 4/3 Flying Unicorn creature at least, I'm almost certain he had another creature of power 4 or greater as well). I pay for both effects, but I was unable to target my opponent's creatures with their own spell and timed out my decision, forcing the spell to kill both my Scorpion Dragons (instead of the original one token, or as I intended- two of their own creatures) losing me the game immediately after.

    What I think is happening is that under normal circumstances, spells of this nature don't consider the owners cards as valid targets out of the owner's best interest, so when a spell by the opponent (in this case: Me) is allowed to redirect it, the spell's list of 'Valid' targets does not update for the Opponent's best interest (including target's the spell's owner controls (Though really, true valid targets should be ownership agnostic. ALL Creatures with power greater than 4 are technically valid targets no matter whose side of the field they are on)).

    I sincerely hope this is fixed soon as this bug makes redirection spells into useless dead weight, or worse: a False Hope that backfires. PLEASE look into this.

    An opponent cast a spell (I don't remember the spell's name) to "Destroy target creature with power 4 or greater" targeting one of my Scorpion Dragon Tokens (made with Magda). I go to cast "Return the Favor" to redirect that spell into destroying one of my opponent's own fliers and protecting my scorpion at the same time (They have a 4/3 Flying Unicorn creature at least, I'm almost certain he had another creature of power 4 or greater as well). I pay for both effects, but I was unable to target my opponent's creatures with their own spell and timed… more

    •  

    2 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Gameplay  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

14. Leyline giving bonuses from lifelink before resolution of damages

    In game according to the rule if a creature gets damage equal or superior to its toughness, it die.
    The white leyline (current standard) allows to give bonuses if the controller have more than a certain number of hp.

    Right now I just witness an interaction where the leyline gave bonuses to creature that were 0 in toughness before they die. I understand that lifelink triggers in same time as the damages but the bonus from the leyline that is activated by the life gain from the damage should activate AFTER the resolution of the damage. Because if the damage are not resolved the player do not gain life from lifelink. Thus the creatures that reach 0 toughness during the damage step should die not get a +2/+2 instead of dying.

    This is a bug in the order of resolution in your engine. It might not seem like much but it is a huge issue rule wise.
    Please fix this ASAP.

    In game according to the rule if a creature gets damage equal or superior to its toughness, it die.
    The white leyline (current standard) allows to give bonuses if the controller have more than a certain number of hp.

    Right now I just witness an interaction where the leyline gave bonuses to creature that were 0 in toughness before they die. I understand that lifelink triggers in same time as the damages but the bonus from the leyline that is activated by the life gain from the damage should activate AFTER the resolution of the damage. Because if the damage… more

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Gameplay  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

15. Cards face down in hand

    On Steam / Linux I have never had any issues until today, card in my hand drawn face down. When I played it, the front doesn't load correctly and it gets stuck on the stack, even though the game engine played it correctly and I was able to get to the end of the game, the broken card stayed on the stack the whole time.

    This happened two games in a row, in the first game I just ignored the face down card in my hand but in the second game I tried to play it and it turned into a broken looking Cloud, Midgar Mercenary. The card stayed stuck on the stack but the game proceeded like it had come into play, i searched my library and played another equipment before the game ended. In the screenshot you can see another face down card in my hand, probably another Cloud but IDK.

    On Steam / Linux I have never had any issues until today, card in my hand drawn face down. When I played it, the front doesn't load correctly and it gets stuck on the stack, even though the game engine played it correctly and I was able to get to the end of the game, the broken card stayed on the stack the whole time.

    This happened two games in a row, in the first game I just ignored the face down card in my hand but in the second game I tried to play it and it turned into… more

    •  

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  User Interface  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

16. Loss of MTGA "Additional" Data

    I've been having to redownload the game multiple times for my Android Samsung 24 Ultra. It is also happened on my windows 10 PC. Approximately 13 GB in my windows 10 case and approximately 3.4 GB large on my phone.i re-downloaded it once on my pc, lots the data again, and I've had to download this five times on my phone as nearly every 2 to 3 days it loses the data and needs to re-download MTGA this started happening after the Edge of Eternities set, not sure if that makes a difference or if anything was changed internally in the game engine of mtga.

    Can we get away to more permanently keep the data on our phone or Windows pc? Redownloading this is using a lot of my data for the month and I do not want to exceed my limit. If it's not corrected I'll just stop buying Magic the Gathering stuff, paper and mtga.

    I've been having to redownload the game multiple times for my Android Samsung 24 Ultra. It is also happened on my windows 10 PC. Approximately 13 GB in my windows 10 case and approximately 3.4 GB large on my phone.i re-downloaded it once on my pc, lots the data again, and I've had to download this five times on my phone as nearly every 2 to 3 days it loses the data and needs to re-download MTGA this started happening after the Edge of Eternities set, not sure if that makes a difference or if anything was changed internally in… more

    •  

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Gameplay  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

17. Affordances for Infinite Mana production / Unlimited card draw engines

    I have been playing around with a pet deck in Arena Standard which can generate infinite mana and unlimited card draw, but the effectiveness of doing so has been stymied by games being forced to a draw or me being forced to cease drawing cards and generating mana by Arena's "stall protection". It seems to believe that no progress is being made in the game state, even though I am continuously drawing cards and developing my field, as well as generating enough mana to cast a way to close out the game.

    The specific cards I am using are Agatha's Soul Cauldron with a Sleep-Cursed Faerie exiled by it, two or more copies of Badgermole Cub in order to generate infinite mana -- all creatures that can tap for mana with +1/+1 counters on them, such as a land animated by Earthbending, will tap for [X] plus [G] for each instance of Badgermole Cub, and can then untap themselves for [2] using Sleep-Cursed Faerie's activated ability, adding one mana to the pool each time --

    And Stormchaser's Talent and Boomerang Basics to draw an unlimited number of cards -- [U] to cast Stormchaser's Talent, [3U] to return Boomerang Basics to hand from the graveyard, [U] to cast Boomerang Basics targeting Stormchaser's Talent, drawing a card in the process, which can be repeated indefinitely thanks to generating unlimited mana --

    Which can be then done until a finisher, usually Craterhoof Behemoth or an arbitrarily large Goldvein Hydra can be drawn and cast.

    I recognized that there are severe downsides to using this strategy on a digital client compared to playing in paper -- in paper play, I could simply demonstrate that the mana generation loop is indeed a loop, have my opponent acknowledge it, and say I repeat the process until I generate an arbitrarily large amount of mana, compared to having to click through the abilities manually for each iteration of the loop -- which cannot reasonably be solved due to the limitations of said digital format.

    However, I believe the game being forced to draw in the case of the mana generation loop is not a reasonable result. As long as additional mana is being added to a player's mana pool and has ways to spend it, the game state is progressing, not being stalled. I would appreciate if an affordance for situations like this was made in Arena.

    I have been playing around with a pet deck in Arena Standard which can generate infinite mana and unlimited card draw, but the effectiveness of doing so has been stymied by games being forced to a draw or me being forced to cease drawing cards and generating mana by Arena's "stall protection". It seems to believe that no progress is being made in the game state, even though I am continuously drawing cards and developing my field, as well as generating enough mana to cast a way to close out the game.

    The specific cards I am using are Agatha's… more

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Product Suggestion  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

18. Searching Cards

    Would be great if WotC made an effort to make it easy to find cards. And allow third party sites to see updated cards on MTGA. You see the s:"cube-52.60" is not an intuitive search for the latest cards added to MTGA that are impossible to find. Where s:TLA and s:TLE are easier and more logical searches…

    I get Cube April doesnt get paid nearly enough to operate Scryfall fully, yet the people who make an effort; they should have an easy enough time, running a better search engine than WotC can. (My understanding is that WotC is still a small indie company, not testing for bugs and releasing half updates, requiring follow up patches shortly thereafter)
    https://scryfall.com/search?as=grid&order=name&q=preordain+%28game%3Apaper%29

    We can see how WotC’s own database is not updated fully, in part cause of how poorly the announcement was made; without a logical set code:
    https://gatherer.wizards.com/TDC/en-us/161/preordain

    Would be great if WotC made an effort to make it easy to find cards. And allow third party sites to see updated cards on MTGA. You see the s:"cube-52.60" is not an intuitive search for the latest cards added to MTGA that are impossible to find. Where s:TLA and s:TLE are easier and more logical searches…

    I get Cube April doesnt get paid nearly enough to operate Scryfall fully, yet the people who make an effort; they should have an easy enough time, running a better search engine than WotC can. (My understanding is that WotC is still a… more

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Deck Building / Collection  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

19. [[Case of the Lost Witness]] + [[Ephemerate]] Incorrect rules interactions

    Hello Rules-engine team,

    I belive I encountered a gameplay bug (incorrect rules interaction) while playing arena cube when I attempted to [[Ephemerate]] a [[Fblthp, the Lost]] conjured by [[Case of the Lost Witness]]. Some more observations (log file too big to attach):

    • the spell was put on the stack, but seems to have not fully resolved since the Rebound reminder box didn't get created.
    • the conjured Fblthp did not get put in my hand
    • the ephemerate did go to my graveyard

    This was on PC client.

    Hope this helps spot an issue, and is not me wasting someones time because I missed some rules interatction on board!!
    Colby V

    Hello Rules-engine team,

    I belive I encountered a gameplay bug (incorrect rules interaction) while playing arena cube when I attempted to [[Ephemerate]] a [[Fblthp, the Lost]] conjured by [[Case of the Lost Witness]]. Some more observations (log file too big to attach):

    • the spell was put on the stack, but seems to have not fully resolved since the Rebound reminder box didn't get created.
    • the conjured Fblthp did not get put in my hand
    • the ephemerate did go to my graveyard

    This was on PC client.

    Hope this helps spot an issue, and is not me wasting someones time… more

    0 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Gameplay  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

20. Talion the kindly lord

    The interaction between Talion, the Kindly Lord and cloning effects, such as those produced by Clone, Spark Double, or Mirrorhall Mimic, does not consistently function as one might anticipate, due to the intricate interplay of replacement effects and copy mechanics in Magic: The Gathering.

    Talion, the Kindly Lord possesses a characteristic replacement effect: “As Talion enters the battlefield, choose a number between 1 and 10. Whenever an opponent casts a spell with mana value equal to the chosen number, that player loses 2 life and you draw a card.” Critically, the choice of number is made as the permanent enters the battlefield, not as a triggered ability. Consequently, this decision occurs outside the stack and is intrinsically linked to the entering event itself.

    When a clone effect creates a copy of Talion, the game first establishes the cloned permanent’s characteristics and then applies any relevant “as enters the battlefield” replacement effects. In principle, the clone should permit the controller to select a number independently of the original Talion, thereby enabling its associated life-loss and card-drawing triggers to function autonomously.

    In practice, however, some digital implementations fail to maintain the integrity of this linkage. While the interface may correctly prompt the player to choose a number, the subsequent triggered ability frequently does not resolve as intended: the visual cue appears, but the life-loss and card-drawing effects fail to occur. This discrepancy is not a matter of rules ambiguity but rather a technical oversight in the execution of the game engine.

    Under the official rules, a cloned Talion that enters the battlefield should fully replicate the original’s functionality, including independent selection of a number and proper resolution of triggered effects. Each instance operates autonomously, with triggers linked explicitly to the chosen number for that particular permanent.

    The interaction between Talion, the Kindly Lord and cloning effects, such as those produced by Clone, Spark Double, or Mirrorhall Mimic, does not consistently function as one might anticipate, due to the intricate interplay of replacement effects and copy mechanics in Magic: The Gathering.

    Talion, the Kindly Lord possesses a characteristic replacement effect: “As Talion enters the battlefield, choose a number between 1 and 10. Whenever an opponent casts a spell with mana value equal to the chosen number, that player loses 2 life and you draw a card.” Critically, the choice of number is made as the permanent enters… more

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Gameplay  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating