MTG Arena Bugs & Product Suggestions
This page is for reporting bugs and submitting product suggestions. If you are experiencing issues with your account, with an order, or otherwise need customer support, please click here.
How to report a bug
1. Give us the steps to reproduce the bug
2. Note which platform you’re using (PC, Steam, Mac, Android, or iOS)
3. Enter the actual results you’re experiencing
4. Enter the expected results of the feature
5. Add any relevant screenshots/videos
6. If you found a workaround, please add workaround steps.
Examples of bugs: Incorrect rules interactions, wrong event rewards, issues with client functions like creating decks
How to submit product suggestions
- Select “Product Suggestion” as the Category for your suggestion
- Enter your feedback
- Add any relevant screenshots/videos
Examples of product suggestions: Feedback on visual effects, recommendations for user interface improvements, new feature requests
--------------
If you receive an error message that your attachment did not upload, please check to make sure it is smaller than 50 MB.
16825 results found
-
historic alchemy
please split historic into a second format with no digital rebalancing whatsoever. digital cards are ok.
49 votes -
Please don't have rebalances done for Alchemy affect Historic
Changes to ban/suspend/rebalance cards in Alchemy should have no impact on the cards in Historic.
If a card is problematic in historic and you want to re-balance it specifically with that format in mind rather then ban it then I'm fine with that (though not everyone is).
As a historic player I get excited for the most powerful cards that come out with each standard set since they are the most likely to be playable in historic. But them being powerful also means they are now the most likely cards to be nerfed based on Alchemy power level which dampens…
60 votes -
Alchemy
Terrible idea to have rebalanced cards affect historic. Leave our beloved format alone, this is nothing but a blatant money grab which will alienate a giant part of your playerbase. Ridiculous that someone even came up with this idea let alone that it was approved, all in the name of lining your pockets even more. Don't you think you make enough money with arena already??!!
45 votes -
Alchemy historic
Wotc the changes to historic cards in addition to alchemy makes me think your abusing ***** or common thrives. There is no reason whatsoever for this change you even have to code in the original first so it’s not about card copies and if it is then fix it. No one cares if you wanna make alchemy go for it but please don’t nuke historic. But on the brute side we are not whores cause whores get money when you *********, you won’t even give us back wild cards….if this happens I’m done
111 votes -
Alchemy makes me quit Arena
I'm a long time magic player and have spent several thousands of dollars on this game but after yesterday's Alchemy announcement I am sorry to say that I am done playing constructed on Arena. You're losing me as a customer.
I don't like the idea of digital cards changing so that they don't match the real world physical cards. This is a cognitive load that is unnecessary. Change the card name to something else if you're planning on rebalancing cards. Paper and the original digital version of the card should be in sync. I'm done with constructed on Arena. I'm…
52 votes -
Nerfs need compensation
Nerfed cards need to be compensated through wildcards, getting your entire deck invalidated by the Davriel nerf without receiving any compensation is absolutely terrible and will only get worse with the incoming monthly balance changes.
20 votes -
alchemy is a bad idea
alchemy is a bad idea
75 votes -
Alchemy appears to threaten paper Magic
If Alchemy does become the primary format for Magic Arena in terms of design, support, and player-base then it will eventually ruin the paper formats as many of their cards and metas will no longer by insync. They'll practically be two different games.
This also sets a precedence to allow Wizards to change ANY card which could invalidate older paper collections. That said, what incentive is there to continue puchasing paper magic anymore?
27 votes -
Keep historic cards unchanged with alchemy
Dont change Historic with Alchemy updates. This destroys the only eternal format available on Arena, which is important. It will kill interest in Arena.
83 votes -
Do not destroy historic
Do not destroy historic.
Alchemy is a fine idea. Putting the rebalanced cards into historic is not. You are ruining a game mode that people have spent thousands on.
Keep alchemy balances on standard legal paper cards in alchemy.
It's so simple that it blows my mind you have ended up where you are right now.
It's even more stupid than the 2 wildcards for historic **** you tried to pull.66 votes -
Provide an eternal format for MTGA
I am not opposed to Alchemy or Historic being a unique digital only format, but an eternal format where cards are unchanged needs to be implemented on Arena. Pioneer and/or Modern being the most logical. It could even be another unique format (Pioneer plus fetch lands because shuffling isn’t an issue in digital) like Historic was prior to the digital only cards. But consistency with paper cards and allowing cards to live on post-standard rotation is something that a significant portion of the player base wants, and I believe is necessary for the long-term health of MTGA.
47 votes -
Infinite loop
Player controls Heliod, Sun crowned and Soul warden, Constantly targeting Scurry Oak to make dudes, gain life, make dudes, gain life etc, and cannot be stopped by opponent only play the other player, which can go on for days, weeks, months, years.....
9 votes -
Alchemy
Alchemy makes me not want to play MTGA at all I see this issue that you are trying to address but this not the right way to do so. I want to play magic not hearthstone, this just feels bad it feels like a betrayal of magic at its core and it make me concern about investing in arena at all if this is the direction your going in.
Standard get stale fast its a real issue. Instead of corrupting the integrity of the game with digital only mechanics and buffs and nerfs truing the game into magic light may…
89 votes -
#leavehistoricalone
i dont care about standard or alchemy - do what you want with this formats. but leave historic alone. dont make it a life format, no rebalancing of cards, do not shove digital only cards down our throat. nobody asked for this. we want quality of life features, we want a better economy and we want pioneer. stop messing around. give us a non rotatind place to play with our cards, and most important STOP IT with this digital only cards nonsense!
61 votes -
Please don't mix Alchemy with Historic
If those changes happen I will uninstall the game, I love mtg and have played for more than 15 years now, I have my Arena account since the closed beta and have convinced multiple of my friends to ditch other tcg's for Arena. I play exclusively historic, as I prefer non rotating formats, a long time ago you promised to implement Pioneer onto the client, but you lied about it, now you plan to terminate the only eternal format available without ant consideration to your player-base. If Alchemy affect historic without any news about pioneer, in the 8th I will…
111 votes -
Alchemy
Alchemy as an "alternate Standard" is a fun idea that I don't mind -- while I like Standard, being able to switch back and forth between Standard and Alchemy without too much hassle (and getting to play a new format with most of the same cards if Standard is stale) is great. But I am super unhappy about the rebalanced cards being the versions legal in Historic and Historic Brawl. This deeply harms the point of a non-rotating format and from a consumer perspective feels like a way to give out fewer wildcards from bans. I don't see any good…
227 votes -
Reconsider Alchemy
Wizards, we all know you love a cash grab and do the bare minimum for players. Could probably write a book full of examples.
But we play anyway, cuz the game is good.
Are ye not going a wee bit too f**king far now though? I don't even gaf about Historic and can see this as a terrible idea, awfully implemented, woefully announced.
Please wise up
82 votes -
Fix/Update Existing Problems First before Alchemy
Seriously WOTC? Why on earth would you make a new format when your existing platform needs so much work. If you want to add new features, add the ones your player base has been begging for, not ones the game would be perfectly fine without. All you’re doing is creating more of a mess for yourselves in the long run and slowly but steadily eroding your player base
55 votes -
Keep Alchemy and Historic separated
Just let us have an eternal format on the client. This is magic, not some cheap digital only game, let us play Magic.
If we wanted to play any other clone we would by now.126 votes -
Alchemy and historic
Alchemy as a format isn’t an issue but the rebalanced cards is a huge issue for historic. You originally promised me that all my old standard cards would have a home in historic but now those same powerful cards might not even be playable in historic. I’m not asking you to remove this. Instead please add pioneer ASAP so my “paper” version from start date decks can still be played in an eternal format on arena
207 votes
- Don't see your idea?