3024 results found

1. Large Stack Resolution

   I recently had an issue where I executed the engine I built around Trumpeting Carnosaur and Flickering Hound in a game but the stack became very large and ultimately, the Arena client punished me for it and I lost the game. In this scenario, I knew the timer would be an issue so I was clicking through the interactions as quickly as I could and had no time to calculate. My opponent was significantly ahead on life, so it was unclear when was 'enough'. Additionally, late Delney discoveries significantly increased the time to execute on the stack already played. I ran out of time while moving as quickly as I could and my own Terror of The Peaks effects defaulted to targeting me and nearly killed me. I've had similar issues with combo decks in the past.

   In this scenario, it was an instant win over the board but a loss on Arena, wherein, I was punished for executing my strategy. I propose there are several changes Wizards could make to improve how large stack resolutions are handled for both players.

   Firstly, I'd suggest an increment based timer, as is frequently used in speed chess. The player gets a little time added back onto the wick when they take a meaningful action, rewarding active play and keeping things moving. This should have an upper limit (total amount of additional time that can be allocated) still to prevent Players stalling out the game with infinite combos.

   When Players do still run out of time, with the increment timer active:
   - Where the max limit has been reached with the increments (active play), they should be unable to add any further actions onto the stack without interaction from their opponent. Any remaining interactions on the stack should be automatically handled as with the current system (with some logical improvements).
   - When the stack is still being executed by arena autonomously after the time has expired:
   - Damage dealing effects should default to targeting the opponents face first, then permanents they own, then no target, and only when none of those options are viable, the casting player.
   - When time expires with cards on the stack during active play (increment used) the client should end the phase of play, rather than the players turn. If time expires through inactive play (increments not expired eg. stalling) the turn should be skipped as normal.
   - Allowing players to batch interactions of a specific kind of interaction (e.g. Target Opponent for all Terror of The Peaks damage)) when the stack reaches a certain threshold could further save time.
   - Additionally, disabling animations once the stack reaches a certain threshold would improve performance and speed up execution time

   My argument is that the current timer creates a counterproductive incentive: players executing complex combinations are encouraged to rush through interactions rather than assess the board state and determine when they have achieved lethal. This can result in unnecessarily extending combinations, which further increases the time needed to resolve them. I think these changes would better reward skilled play, help players to more swiftly navigate complex interactions on the stack, and ultimately improve the gameplay experience for both players.

   I recently had an issue where I executed the engine I built around Trumpeting Carnosaur and Flickering Hound in a game but the stack became very large and ultimately, the Arena client punished me for it and I lost the game. In this scenario, I knew the timer would be an issue so I was clicking through the interactions as quickly as I could and had no time to calculate. My opponent was significantly ahead on life, so it was unclear when was 'enough'. Additionally, late Delney discoveries significantly increased the time to execute on the stack already played. I… more

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Gameplay  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

2. Couldnt cast wash away

   Wash Away - I couldn't cast it. I had 5 open mana. 2 of them were blue. Oponent cast spell, wash away is highlighted like I can cast it, but when I do both options are greyed out, so my only option is to cancel it
   was plying against mono red, so no teferi was around

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Gameplay  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

3. KingFuego ou quand tu paye pour acheter tes victoires en classement.

   Bonjour à tous,

   alors voilà ce que fait cette entreprise avec les payeurs, ce joueur a dù donner des sommes considérable à cette entreprise tellement son tirage de carte est improbable et suspect.

   Cela fait plusieurs fois que je l'affronte sur le mode classement et premier conseil, CONCEDER direct, son deck n'a rien d'extraordinaire sauf si l'on a une pioche de carte dans un ordre bien précis or c'est à chaque fois le cas pour lui en plus d'avoir une pioche désatreuse pour vous.

   Et en plus vous allez avoir le droit au fameux sondage qui vous demande si vous avez apprécié ce match alors que cette partie ne reléve pas de la chance ou de la malchance mais belle et bien du truquage flagrant de la pioche.

   Donc ne perdez plus du précieux temps de votre vie avec ce genre d'adversaire qui payent pour gagner en jouant des decks copier/coller, ils n'en valent pas la peine, autant les laisser se persuader tous seuls qu'ils savent jouer car c'est la seule chose qui permet de donner un sens à leurs pathétique petite existence de névrosé frustré complétement inutile pour l'humanité.

   Je suis tous autant navré de sa médiocrité de joueur, qu'énervé de perdre lorsque qu'une entreprise arnaque ces clients en faussant honteusement son jeux pour un mercdantilisme chronique.

   Cordialement.

   Bonjour à tous,

   alors voilà ce que fait cette entreprise avec les payeurs, ce joueur a dù donner des sommes considérable à cette entreprise tellement son tirage de carte est improbable et suspect.

   Cela fait plusieurs fois que je l'affronte sur le mode classement et premier conseil, CONCEDER direct, son deck n'a rien d'extraordinaire sauf si l'on a une pioche de carte dans un ordre bien précis or c'est à chaque fois le cas pour lui en plus d'avoir une pioche désatreuse pour vous.

   Et en plus vous allez avoir le droit au fameux sondage qui vous demande si vous… more

   •  

   •  

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Store  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

4. KingFuego ou quand tu paye pour acheter ton classement

   Bonjour à tous,

   alors voilà ce que fait cette entreprise avec les payeurs, ce joueur a dù donner des sommes considérable à cette entreprise tellement son tirage de carte est improbable et suspect.

   Cela fait plusieurs fois que je l'affronte sur le mode classement et premier conseil, CONCEDER direct, son deck n'a rien d'extraordinaire sauf si l'on a une pioche de carte dans un ordre bien précis or c'est à chaque fois le cas pour lui en plus d'avoir une pioche désatreuse pour vous.

   Et en plus vous allez avoir le droit au fameux sondage qui vous demande si vous avez apprécié ce match alors que cette partie ne reléve pas de la chance ou de la malchance mais belle et bien du truquage flagrant de la pioche.

   Donc ne perdez plus du précieux temps de votre vie avec ce genre d'adversaire qui payent pour gagner en jouant des decks copier/coller, ils n'en valent pas la peine, autant les laisser se persuader tous seuls qu'ils savent jouer car c'est la seule chose qui permet de donner un sens à leurs pathétique petite existence de névrosé frustré complétement inutile pour l'humanité.

   Je suis tous autant navré de sa médiocrité de joueur, qu'énervé de perdre lorsque qu'une entreprise arnaque ces clients en faussant honteusement son jeux pour un mercdantilisme chronique.

   Bonjour à tous,

   alors voilà ce que fait cette entreprise avec les payeurs, ce joueur a dù donner des sommes considérable à cette entreprise tellement son tirage de carte est improbable et suspect.

   Cela fait plusieurs fois que je l'affronte sur le mode classement et premier conseil, CONCEDER direct, son deck n'a rien d'extraordinaire sauf si l'on a une pioche de carte dans un ordre bien précis or c'est à chaque fois le cas pour lui en plus d'avoir une pioche désatreuse pour vous.

   Et en plus vous allez avoir le droit au fameux sondage qui vous demande si vous… more

   •  

   •  

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Gameplay  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

5. Survery link broken

   Survey link for my account is broken. At least clicking on the link does something from android. On mac it just doesn't open...

   •  

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  User Interface  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

6. Suggestion: Implement Transparent "Bracket Protection" for Brawl Queue

   The current deck-weight and MMR matchmaking system in Brawl is a complete failure. Players who intentionally build casual, low-weight decks are constantly being forced into matches against Tier-1 "**** Queue" engines.

   To fix this, MTG Arena needs to implement a transparent Bracket Protection system similar to how the community categorizes tabletop Commander tiers.

   Decks should be dynamically locked into strict brackets (e.g., Bracket 1 for jank, Bracket 2 for fair/mid-range, Bracket 3 for optimized casual, and Bracket 4 for high-power engines like Pantlaza and Ygra). A glaringly obvious "Bracket 2" deck should mathematically NEVER be paired against a "Bracket 4" monstrosity.

   Relying on hidden, volatile card weights has ruined format variance and forced casual players into constant Turn-Zero concessions. Implementing hard bracket boundaries is the only way to protect casual integrity and stop high-power queue bleed.

   The current deck-weight and MMR matchmaking system in Brawl is a complete failure. Players who intentionally build casual, low-weight decks are constantly being forced into matches against Tier-1 "**** Queue" engines.

   To fix this, MTG Arena needs to implement a transparent Bracket Protection system similar to how the community categorizes tabletop Commander tiers.

   Decks should be dynamically locked into strict brackets (e.g., Bracket 1 for jank, Bracket 2 for fair/mid-range, Bracket 3 for optimized casual, and Bracket 4 for high-power engines like Pantlaza and Ygra). A glaringly obvious "Bracket 2" deck should mathematically NEVER be paired against a "Bracket 4"… more

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Gameplay  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

7. MUTE TURNS OFF PLANESWALKER/CARD AUDIO

   PLEASE make an option to allow music but let the "mute" option eliminate the VOICES made by those godawful planeswalkers when they come in. If there is a selective button I have been missing PLEASE LET ME KNOW AND I APOLOGIZE FOR SHOUTING

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Gameplay  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

8. "Banned as Commander" has Destroyed Casual Brawl Matchmaking

   The implementation of the "Banned as Commander" system infrastructure has completely broken the casual Brawl queue.

   By rewriting the backend calculation to accommodate dual-banning tags, the hidden deck-weight algorithm has fundamentally collapsed. Meticulously engineered, low-weight, insulated casual decks are now suffering from massive queue bleed, constantly being paired against oppressive, top-tier engines like Pantlaza and Ygra.

   Furthermore, keeping these pushed, format-warping powerhouses entirely legal in the 99 completely defeats the purpose of tiered queues. High-power cards bleed straight into casual mid-range matchups, forcing the entire format into a hyper-efficient, Turn-3 sweat-fest that mimics competitive Standard.

   The "Banned as Commander" feature is an utter failure for queue health. It has ruined format variance and forced casual players into constant Turn-Zero concessions just to protect their sanity. Please fix the cumulative 100-card power calculation and isolate casual deck footprints.

   The implementation of the "Banned as Commander" system infrastructure has completely broken the casual Brawl queue.

   By rewriting the backend calculation to accommodate dual-banning tags, the hidden deck-weight algorithm has fundamentally collapsed. Meticulously engineered, low-weight, insulated casual decks are now suffering from massive queue bleed, constantly being paired against oppressive, top-tier engines like Pantlaza and Ygra.

   Furthermore, keeping these pushed, format-warping powerhouses entirely legal in the 99 completely defeats the purpose of tiered queues. High-power cards bleed straight into casual mid-range matchups, forcing the entire format into a hyper-efficient, Turn-3 sweat-fest that mimics competitive Standard.

   The "Banned as Commander" feature… more

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Gameplay  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

9. プレイ中に動かなくなり、個別の攻撃指定ができなくなった

   ランク戦のなかで、戦闘フェイズ中にゲームが動かなくなり、アリーナを再起動。
   再び戦闘フェイズの場面に戻り、相手が残骸の漂着を構えていたので数を減らして攻撃したかったが、攻撃指定が個別で出来なかった。
   すべて攻撃か攻撃しないかボタンのみ反応。
   フル攻撃で負け。
   フリープレイなら良いですが、高位争いの大事なランク中だったのでこのようなバグは直していただきたい。

   • 

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Gameplay  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

10. Game states warning message while actively casting spells
    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Gameplay  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

11. 日本語版「光り角の海賊」のMTGアリーナでの誤植について

    起動効果に関して、本来なら「このクリーチャーが攻撃していなければ起動できない」と記載されるべき所が「このクリチャーが起動していなければ起動できない」と誤植がある

    •  

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Text Translation  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

12. A different way to handle bans? Longshot?

    What about instead of banning a card the rule was you couldn't put certain cards in decks together. So if two cards make do an infinite combo you want out, you don't have to ban one or the other, you can just say you can't play them in the same deck.
    I am sure this has been thought of and spoken about already.

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Deck Building / Collection  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

13. Draft drop unable to reconnect

    Was in pack 2 of a Reality Fracture premier draft in the PC client and connection to server was lost at approximately 8:13pm est. Exited game and attempted to restart to join the draft again, but arena sat on "checking for updates" for a minute before giving me an error message. After this happened twice, I restarted my computer. As it restarted, I was able to connect into the draft on the android version of the client and make my last 3 picks

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Events  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

14. Survey not loading

    I got randomly selected and got an email to do a survey. It got me excited because I like surveys. But when I went to the site by clicking more info, it did not send me there or it said can't find survey. Please fix. Love surveys!

    •  

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Events  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

15. Mythic pack not so mythic

    Yesterday I opened a mythic pack and purchased it. I'm not sure if it's a bug,but it seems like it. I opened the mythic pack I purchased and it usually gave a mythic card previously. But on the last one I purchased it only gave a rare card instead of a mythic. Is that even in the probability? So the pack wasn't so mythic.

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Store  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

16. Opponent Blocked Creature with Menace with only one Creature

    I just finished a game where my opponent was able to block my creature with menace with only one creature. Why? Log files attached.

    • 

    2 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Gameplay  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

17. Ramaping baloths

    Rampaging Baloth was creating 2 per land instead of 1.

    • 

    2 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Gameplay  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

18. Opponent Stats panel won't open

    The stats panel for my opponent simply would not open at all, so I had no way to see the information I needed.

    I cast Freeze, but because the stats were not working, I couldn’t see how many cards my opponent had left in their deck. I obviously ended up losing because they still had cards remaining.

    2 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Gameplay  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

19. parallax wave + containment priest vs command zone

    opponent's cmd is under pwave. i have containment priest on board. i let pwave go. but opponent was able to move his commander to command zone. this shouldn't happen since the commander doesn't move to another zone.

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Gameplay  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

20. Casting bug

    Walls of Ba Sing Say, 8 cost creature, was cast for two mana, with nothing allowing it to be cast or put onto the battlefield for lower cost or skipping it's cost. No option to upload game log from mobile either...

    2 votes

    Vote Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Gameplay  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating